Physician Practice Affiliation Drives Site of Care Cost Differentials: An Opportunity to Reduce Healthcare Expenditures.

Q2 Medicine
Journal of market access & health policy Pub Date : 2025-07-24 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.3390/jmahp13030036
Deepak A Kapoor, Mark Camel, David Eagle, Lauren C Makhoul, Justin Maroney, Zhou Yang, Paul Berggreen
{"title":"Physician Practice Affiliation Drives Site of Care Cost Differentials: An Opportunity to Reduce Healthcare Expenditures.","authors":"Deepak A Kapoor, Mark Camel, David Eagle, Lauren C Makhoul, Justin Maroney, Zhou Yang, Paul Berggreen","doi":"10.3390/jmahp13030036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The continued migration of physicians from independent practice to affiliation with larger entities has garnered significant scrutiny. These affiliation models include hospitals and health systems, payers and corporate entities, and management services organizations, which may or may not be private equity (PE)-backed. Data on the impact of different physician affiliation models on cost of care is limited. We examined the relationship between provider affiliation model, site of care (SOC), and cost of care for certain high-volume procedures in procedure-intensive specialties for both Medicare and commercial insurance. We found that hospital-affiliated physicians are least likely-and PE-affiliated physicians are most likely-to provide care in lower-cost settings. For both Medicare and commercial insurance, SOC contributes meaningfully to procedure unit price, which is consistently greater in hospital-based settings. These findings suggest that the physician affiliation model and associated SOC cost differentials contribute materially to healthcare expenditures. As the Medicare cost differentials are set by statute and regulations, strategies such as site-neutral payments are needed to mitigate the monetary impact of historical and future physician practice migration.</p>","PeriodicalId":73811,"journal":{"name":"Journal of market access & health policy","volume":"13 3","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12371938/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of market access & health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jmahp13030036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The continued migration of physicians from independent practice to affiliation with larger entities has garnered significant scrutiny. These affiliation models include hospitals and health systems, payers and corporate entities, and management services organizations, which may or may not be private equity (PE)-backed. Data on the impact of different physician affiliation models on cost of care is limited. We examined the relationship between provider affiliation model, site of care (SOC), and cost of care for certain high-volume procedures in procedure-intensive specialties for both Medicare and commercial insurance. We found that hospital-affiliated physicians are least likely-and PE-affiliated physicians are most likely-to provide care in lower-cost settings. For both Medicare and commercial insurance, SOC contributes meaningfully to procedure unit price, which is consistently greater in hospital-based settings. These findings suggest that the physician affiliation model and associated SOC cost differentials contribute materially to healthcare expenditures. As the Medicare cost differentials are set by statute and regulations, strategies such as site-neutral payments are needed to mitigate the monetary impact of historical and future physician practice migration.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

医师执业联盟驱动站点的护理成本差异:一个机会,以减少医疗保健支出。
医生从独立执业到隶属于更大的实体的持续迁移已经获得了重要的审查。这些关联模式包括医院和卫生系统、支付方和公司实体,以及管理服务组织,这些组织可能是私募股权(PE)支持的,也可能不是。不同医师加盟模式对医疗成本影响的数据是有限的。我们研究了医疗保险和商业保险中某些程序密集型专业的高容量程序的提供者合作模式、护理地点(SOC)和护理成本之间的关系。我们发现医院附属医生在低成本环境中提供护理的可能性最小,而pe附属医生最有可能。对于医疗保险和商业保险来说,SOC对手术单价的贡献都是有意义的,而在医院的情况下,SOC的贡献一直更大。这些发现提示医师隶属关系模式和相关的SOC成本差异对医疗保健支出有重要贡献。由于医疗保险费用差异是由法规和规章规定的,因此需要采取诸如地点中立支付等策略来减轻历史和未来医生执业迁移的货币影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信