Mapping Vaccine Sentiment by Analyzing Spanish-Language Social Media Posts and Survey-Based Public Opinion: Dual Methods Study.

IF 2.3 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JMIR infodemiology Pub Date : 2025-08-29 DOI:10.2196/63223
Agnes Huguet-Feixa, Wasim Ahmed, Eva Artigues-Barberà, Joaquim Sol, Xavier Gomez-Arbones, Pere Godoy, Marta Ortega Bravo
{"title":"Mapping Vaccine Sentiment by Analyzing Spanish-Language Social Media Posts and Survey-Based Public Opinion: Dual Methods Study.","authors":"Agnes Huguet-Feixa, Wasim Ahmed, Eva Artigues-Barberà, Joaquim Sol, Xavier Gomez-Arbones, Pere Godoy, Marta Ortega Bravo","doi":"10.2196/63223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The internet and social media have been considered useful platforms for obtaining health information. However, critical and erroneous content about vaccines on social media has been associated with vaccination delays and refusal.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to examine how social networks influence access to and perceptions of vaccine-related information. We sought to (1) quantify the proportion of individuals engaging with vaccine-related content on social media and to characterize their demographic and behavioral profiles through an internet-based population survey conducted in Spain and (2) to analyze vaccine-related sentiments and opinions in Spanish and Catalan posts on X (X Corp [formerly Twitter, Inc] and geolocate them using artificial intelligence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two complementary methodologies were applied. First, an observational study was conducted via a self-administered internet-based questionnaire among adults in Spain in 2021. Second, we analyzed Spanish- and Catalan-language posts from X, collected between March and December 2021. Sentiment analysis was performed using a workflow developed in Orange Data Mining (Bioinformatics Laboratory, Faculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana). Geolocation was based on user-defined locations and visualized using Microsoft Power Business Intelligence. Social network analysis was conducted with NodeXL Pro (Social Media Research Foundation) to identify and characterize the 5 largest user communities discussing vaccines. Although based on independent data sources, the 2 approaches provided complementary methodological insights.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 1312 respondents in the survey, 85.7% (1124/1312) stated that they were regular social network users, and 66% (850/1287) reported having encountered antivaccine information on social networks. Of these, 24.3% (205/845) experienced doubts about receiving recommended vaccines, and out of those with doubts, 13.3% (27/203) refused at least 1 vaccine proposed by a health care professional. A total of 479,734 Spanish and Catalan posts on X were analyzed, with 54.44% (n=261,183) posts classified as negative, 28.18% (n=135,194) as neutral, and 17.37% (n=83,357) as positive. Sentiment varied across regions, with more negative posts appearing to derive from South America, with a mix in Europe and more positive posts in North America. Analysis of the topic words and key themes allowed the grouping of the predominant themes of the 5 study groups, which were (1) vaccination efforts during the COVID-19 pandemic, (2) issues of vaccine theft and struggles in managing and securing the vaccine supply, (3) campaigns in the State of Mexico, (4) vaccination efforts for older adults, and (5) the vaccination campaign in Colombia to combat COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High proportions of exposure to antivaccine content were reported by the surveyed population. Sentiment analysis and geolocation of posts on the social network X suggested a notable presence of Spanish-language posts categorized as negative, predominantly from South America. The thematic analysis of conversations on X may provide valuable insights into the population's opinions about vaccines.</p>","PeriodicalId":73554,"journal":{"name":"JMIR infodemiology","volume":"5 ","pages":"e63223"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12400125/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR infodemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/63223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The internet and social media have been considered useful platforms for obtaining health information. However, critical and erroneous content about vaccines on social media has been associated with vaccination delays and refusal.

Objective: This study aimed to examine how social networks influence access to and perceptions of vaccine-related information. We sought to (1) quantify the proportion of individuals engaging with vaccine-related content on social media and to characterize their demographic and behavioral profiles through an internet-based population survey conducted in Spain and (2) to analyze vaccine-related sentiments and opinions in Spanish and Catalan posts on X (X Corp [formerly Twitter, Inc] and geolocate them using artificial intelligence.

Methods: Two complementary methodologies were applied. First, an observational study was conducted via a self-administered internet-based questionnaire among adults in Spain in 2021. Second, we analyzed Spanish- and Catalan-language posts from X, collected between March and December 2021. Sentiment analysis was performed using a workflow developed in Orange Data Mining (Bioinformatics Laboratory, Faculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana). Geolocation was based on user-defined locations and visualized using Microsoft Power Business Intelligence. Social network analysis was conducted with NodeXL Pro (Social Media Research Foundation) to identify and characterize the 5 largest user communities discussing vaccines. Although based on independent data sources, the 2 approaches provided complementary methodological insights.

Results: Among the 1312 respondents in the survey, 85.7% (1124/1312) stated that they were regular social network users, and 66% (850/1287) reported having encountered antivaccine information on social networks. Of these, 24.3% (205/845) experienced doubts about receiving recommended vaccines, and out of those with doubts, 13.3% (27/203) refused at least 1 vaccine proposed by a health care professional. A total of 479,734 Spanish and Catalan posts on X were analyzed, with 54.44% (n=261,183) posts classified as negative, 28.18% (n=135,194) as neutral, and 17.37% (n=83,357) as positive. Sentiment varied across regions, with more negative posts appearing to derive from South America, with a mix in Europe and more positive posts in North America. Analysis of the topic words and key themes allowed the grouping of the predominant themes of the 5 study groups, which were (1) vaccination efforts during the COVID-19 pandemic, (2) issues of vaccine theft and struggles in managing and securing the vaccine supply, (3) campaigns in the State of Mexico, (4) vaccination efforts for older adults, and (5) the vaccination campaign in Colombia to combat COVID-19.

Conclusions: High proportions of exposure to antivaccine content were reported by the surveyed population. Sentiment analysis and geolocation of posts on the social network X suggested a notable presence of Spanish-language posts categorized as negative, predominantly from South America. The thematic analysis of conversations on X may provide valuable insights into the population's opinions about vaccines.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

通过分析西班牙语社交媒体帖子和基于调查的民意来绘制疫苗情绪:双重方法研究。
背景:互联网和社会媒体被认为是获取健康信息的有用平台。然而,社交媒体上关于疫苗的批评和错误内容与疫苗接种延迟和拒绝有关。目的:本研究旨在研究社会网络如何影响疫苗相关信息的获取和认知。我们试图(1)量化在社交媒体上参与疫苗相关内容的个人比例,并通过在西班牙进行的基于互联网的人口调查来描述他们的人口统计和行为概况;(2)分析X (X Corp[以前的Twitter, Inc .]上西班牙语和加泰罗尼亚语帖子中与疫苗相关的情绪和观点,并使用人工智能对其进行地理定位。方法:采用两种互补的方法。首先,一项观察性研究于2021年在西班牙的成年人中通过自我管理的基于互联网的问卷进行。其次,我们分析了X在2021年3月至12月期间收集的西班牙语和加泰罗尼亚语帖子。情感分析使用Orange Data Mining(卢布尔雅那大学计算机与信息科学学院生物信息学实验室)开发的工作流程进行。地理定位基于用户定义的位置,并使用Microsoft Power Business Intelligence实现可视化。使用NodeXL Pro(社交媒体研究基金会)进行了社交网络分析,以确定和描述讨论疫苗的5个最大用户社区。虽然基于独立的数据源,但这两种方法提供了互补的方法见解。结果:在1312名调查对象中,85.7%(1124/1312)的人表示他们是社交网络的常规用户,66%(850/1287)的人表示他们在社交网络上遇到过反疫苗信息。其中,24.3%(205/845)对接受推荐的疫苗有疑虑,而在有疑虑的人中,13.3%(27/203)拒绝了卫生保健专业人员建议的至少一种疫苗。X上共有479,734篇西班牙语和加泰罗尼亚语帖子被分析,其中54.44% (n=261,183)的帖子被分类为负面,28.18% (n=135,194)的帖子被分类为中性,17.37% (n=83,357)的帖子被分类为正面。各地区的情绪各不相同,南美的负面情绪较多,欧洲的负面情绪较多,北美的正面情绪较多。通过对主题词和关键主题的分析,可以对5个研究小组的主要主题进行分组,即:(1)COVID-19大流行期间的疫苗接种工作,(2)疫苗盗窃问题以及在管理和确保疫苗供应方面的困难,(3)墨西哥州的疫苗接种运动,(4)老年人疫苗接种工作,以及(5)哥伦比亚为抗击COVID-19而开展的疫苗接种运动。结论:调查人群中抗疫苗暴露率较高。对社交网络X上的帖子进行情绪分析和地理定位后发现,被归类为负面的西班牙语帖子明显存在,主要来自南美洲。对关于X的对话进行专题分析,可以为了解民众对疫苗的看法提供有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信