Trauma-Informed Care as Structural Disruption: Social Work at the Frontlines of Systems Transformation.

IF 1.4
Quintenilla Merriweather
{"title":"Trauma-Informed Care as Structural Disruption: Social Work at the Frontlines of Systems Transformation.","authors":"Quintenilla Merriweather","doi":"10.1080/26408066.2025.2553838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trauma-Informed Care (TIC) is frequently conceptualized as a clinical intervention targeting individual psychological harm. While valuable in clinical contexts, this framing restricts TIC's broader capacity for systemic and structural transformation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This article reframes TIC as a structural disruption strategy-an equity-driven, systems-level intervention that redefines how health is understood, delivered, and governed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Drawing from social work's integrative approach across clinical, community, and policy domains, the article situates trauma as a predictable outcome of structural violence rather than an individual pathology. Analysis centers on health system fragmentation, particularly the entrenched separation of behavioral and physical health, as a form of systemic harm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The article highlights liberatory innovations that demonstrate TIC's transformative potential, including healing-centered schools, trauma-informed telehealth, and peer-based emergency response models. These examples illustrate pathways for addressing systemic inequities while fostering relational accountability and community-centered care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A paradigm shift is needed-from models of integrated care toward liberatory health systems rooted in justice, equity, and structural transformation. By reframing TIC as a disruption strategy, health and social work can move beyond symptom management to advance structural change.</p>","PeriodicalId":73742,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evidence-based social work (2019)","volume":" ","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evidence-based social work (2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2025.2553838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Trauma-Informed Care (TIC) is frequently conceptualized as a clinical intervention targeting individual psychological harm. While valuable in clinical contexts, this framing restricts TIC's broader capacity for systemic and structural transformation.

Objective: This article reframes TIC as a structural disruption strategy-an equity-driven, systems-level intervention that redefines how health is understood, delivered, and governed.

Methods: Drawing from social work's integrative approach across clinical, community, and policy domains, the article situates trauma as a predictable outcome of structural violence rather than an individual pathology. Analysis centers on health system fragmentation, particularly the entrenched separation of behavioral and physical health, as a form of systemic harm.

Results: The article highlights liberatory innovations that demonstrate TIC's transformative potential, including healing-centered schools, trauma-informed telehealth, and peer-based emergency response models. These examples illustrate pathways for addressing systemic inequities while fostering relational accountability and community-centered care.

Conclusion: A paradigm shift is needed-from models of integrated care toward liberatory health systems rooted in justice, equity, and structural transformation. By reframing TIC as a disruption strategy, health and social work can move beyond symptom management to advance structural change.

作为结构性破坏的创伤知情护理:系统转型前沿的社会工作。
背景:创伤知情护理(TIC)经常被定义为针对个体心理伤害的临床干预。虽然在临床环境中很有价值,但这种框架限制了TIC更广泛的系统和结构转化能力。目的:本文将TIC重新定义为一种结构性破坏策略——一种公平驱动的系统级干预,重新定义了如何理解、提供和管理健康。方法:借鉴社会工作在临床、社区和政策领域的综合方法,文章将创伤定位为结构性暴力的可预测结果,而不是个体病理。分析的重点是卫生系统的碎片化,特别是行为健康和身体健康根深蒂固的分离,这是一种系统性危害。结果:文章强调了展示TIC变革潜力的突破性创新,包括以治疗为中心的学校、创伤信息远程医疗和基于同伴的应急响应模型。这些例子说明了在促进关系问责制和以社区为中心的护理的同时解决系统性不平等的途径。结论:需要进行范式转变——从综合护理模式转向基于正义、公平和结构转型的自由卫生系统。通过将TIC重新定义为破坏策略,卫生和社会工作可以超越症状管理,推动结构变革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信