Youth Comorbidity Patterns and Research Domain Criteria (RDoC)-Informed Factors: A Scoping Review of Person-Centered Psychopathology Research.

IF 1.4
June-Yung Kim, Wenxing Wei, Liat R Johnson, Sarah Balser, Anne Marie Gruber
{"title":"Youth Comorbidity Patterns and Research Domain Criteria (RDoC)-Informed Factors: A Scoping Review of Person-Centered Psychopathology Research.","authors":"June-Yung Kim, Wenxing Wei, Liat R Johnson, Sarah Balser, Anne Marie Gruber","doi":"10.1080/26408066.2025.2544941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>High rates of comorbid psychopathology have driven a growing body of person-centered research to understand the grouping structure of youth comorbidity by identifying meaningful comorbidity patterns and validating them with neurobehavioral factors. The National Institute of Mental Health's Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) offers an etiological framework for systematically identifying constructs organized around major functioning domains. This scoping review study mapped person-centered comorbidity studies and synthesized the RDoC-informed factors of comorbidity patterns.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We followed Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework. Five databases (e.g. PubMed and CINAHL) were searched. Twenty-five peer-reviewed studies examining comorbidity patterns in youth up to age 17 were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One normative pattern was consistently identified, along with one general psychopathology pattern with a higher probability of all symptoms. Additionally, specific patterns, such as internalizing and externalizing patterns, reflecting unique covariances among assessed symptoms, were identified. Of the 43 extracted RDoC-informed factors, systems for social processes (33%) emerged as the most widely examined domains, followed by cognitive (26%), negative valence (19%), and arousal and regulatory (14%) systems. Most factors were differentially associated with comorbidity patterns.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The identified comorbidity patterns supported a conceptualization of psychopathology with broader factors, such as one general and other specific psychopathology factors, reflecting underlying liability for a range of symptoms. Definitive conclusions about the effects of RDoC-informed factors require further studies, given limited evidence of positive valence (5%) and sensorimotor (5%) systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More rigorous incorporation of novel RDoC-informed factors into comorbidity studies may inform evidence-based preventive strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":73742,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evidence-based social work (2019)","volume":" ","pages":"1-29"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evidence-based social work (2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2025.2544941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: High rates of comorbid psychopathology have driven a growing body of person-centered research to understand the grouping structure of youth comorbidity by identifying meaningful comorbidity patterns and validating them with neurobehavioral factors. The National Institute of Mental Health's Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) offers an etiological framework for systematically identifying constructs organized around major functioning domains. This scoping review study mapped person-centered comorbidity studies and synthesized the RDoC-informed factors of comorbidity patterns.

Materials and methods: We followed Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework. Five databases (e.g. PubMed and CINAHL) were searched. Twenty-five peer-reviewed studies examining comorbidity patterns in youth up to age 17 were included.

Results: One normative pattern was consistently identified, along with one general psychopathology pattern with a higher probability of all symptoms. Additionally, specific patterns, such as internalizing and externalizing patterns, reflecting unique covariances among assessed symptoms, were identified. Of the 43 extracted RDoC-informed factors, systems for social processes (33%) emerged as the most widely examined domains, followed by cognitive (26%), negative valence (19%), and arousal and regulatory (14%) systems. Most factors were differentially associated with comorbidity patterns.

Discussion: The identified comorbidity patterns supported a conceptualization of psychopathology with broader factors, such as one general and other specific psychopathology factors, reflecting underlying liability for a range of symptoms. Definitive conclusions about the effects of RDoC-informed factors require further studies, given limited evidence of positive valence (5%) and sensorimotor (5%) systems.

Conclusion: More rigorous incorporation of novel RDoC-informed factors into comorbidity studies may inform evidence-based preventive strategies.

青少年共病模式和研究领域标准(RDoC)-知情因素:以人为中心的精神病理学研究的范围综述。
目的:高比例的共病精神病理驱使越来越多的以人为中心的研究,通过识别有意义的共病模式并与神经行为因素进行验证,来了解青少年共病的分组结构。国家心理健康研究所的研究领域标准(RDoC)为系统地识别围绕主要功能领域组织的构念提供了一个病因学框架。这项范围综述研究绘制了以人为中心的合并症研究,并综合了rdoc告知合并症模式的因素。材料和方法:我们遵循Arksey和O'Malley的方法框架。检索了5个数据库(如PubMed和CINAHL)。包括25项同行评议的研究,检查17岁以下青少年的共病模式。结果:一种规范模式被一致地确定,以及一种具有所有症状较高概率的一般精神病理模式。此外,还确定了特定模式,如内化和外化模式,反映了评估症状之间独特的协方差。在提取的43个rdoc通知因素中,社会过程系统(33%)成为最广泛研究的领域,其次是认知系统(26%)、负价系统(19%)和唤醒和调节系统(14%)。大多数因素与共病模式有不同的相关性。讨论:已确定的共病模式支持精神病理学具有更广泛因素的概念化,例如一种一般和其他特定的精神病理学因素,反映了一系列症状的潜在责任。考虑到有限的正价(5%)和感觉运动(5%)系统的证据,关于rdoc相关因素影响的明确结论需要进一步的研究。结论:更严格地将新的rdoc相关因素纳入合并症研究,可能会为循证预防策略提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信