Arzina Jaffer, Kayleigh Yang, Alisha Ebrahim, Amy N Brown, Ryaan El-Andari, Aleksander Dokollari, Alex J Gregory, Corey Adams, William D T Kent, Ali Fatehi Hassanabad
{"title":"Optimizing Recovery in Cardiac Surgery: A Narrative Review of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols and Clinical Outcomes.","authors":"Arzina Jaffer, Kayleigh Yang, Alisha Ebrahim, Amy N Brown, Ryaan El-Andari, Aleksander Dokollari, Alex J Gregory, Corey Adams, William D T Kent, Ali Fatehi Hassanabad","doi":"10.3390/medsci13030128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is an evidence-based, holistic perioperative recovery protocol intended to improve patient outcomes and decrease postoperative complication rates. While ERAS protocols were first introduced in 1997, specific guidelines for cardiac surgery were not established until 2019. Although the core principles of ERAS remain constant across surgical disciplines, ERAS guidelines for cardiac surgery have remained relatively understudied, likely due to the unique complexities posed by cardiac procedures. Within this comprehensive narrative review, we aimed to explore the current guidelines and evidence for ERAS in both cardiac and non-cardiac surgeries. In non-cardiac surgeries, ERAS has been shown to improve various outcomes, including ICU length of stay, patient satisfaction, and pain management. ERAS for cardiac surgery has also shown encouraging results, including shorter ICU and hospital stays, reduced postoperative opioid use, and faster recovery times. However, there is limited consensus across studies, particularly regarding its impact on morbidity and mortality, with mixed results reported. Furthermore, the limited data on the efficacy of ERAS in minimally invasive cardiac surgeries makes it difficult to establish well-supported guidelines for these procedures. Despite its limitations, the overall outcomes of ERAS for cardiac surgery remain promising. As our understanding and application of ERAS in cardiac surgery continue to evolve, these protocols have the potential to redefine cardiac surgical care standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":74152,"journal":{"name":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12371997/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13030128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is an evidence-based, holistic perioperative recovery protocol intended to improve patient outcomes and decrease postoperative complication rates. While ERAS protocols were first introduced in 1997, specific guidelines for cardiac surgery were not established until 2019. Although the core principles of ERAS remain constant across surgical disciplines, ERAS guidelines for cardiac surgery have remained relatively understudied, likely due to the unique complexities posed by cardiac procedures. Within this comprehensive narrative review, we aimed to explore the current guidelines and evidence for ERAS in both cardiac and non-cardiac surgeries. In non-cardiac surgeries, ERAS has been shown to improve various outcomes, including ICU length of stay, patient satisfaction, and pain management. ERAS for cardiac surgery has also shown encouraging results, including shorter ICU and hospital stays, reduced postoperative opioid use, and faster recovery times. However, there is limited consensus across studies, particularly regarding its impact on morbidity and mortality, with mixed results reported. Furthermore, the limited data on the efficacy of ERAS in minimally invasive cardiac surgeries makes it difficult to establish well-supported guidelines for these procedures. Despite its limitations, the overall outcomes of ERAS for cardiac surgery remain promising. As our understanding and application of ERAS in cardiac surgery continue to evolve, these protocols have the potential to redefine cardiac surgical care standards.
ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery)是一种基于证据的整体围手术期恢复方案,旨在改善患者预后并降低术后并发症发生率。虽然ERAS方案于1997年首次引入,但直到2019年才建立了心脏手术的具体指南。尽管ERAS的核心原则在外科学科中保持不变,但心脏手术的ERAS指南仍然相对缺乏研究,这可能是由于心脏手术的独特复杂性。在这篇全面的叙述性综述中,我们旨在探讨心脏和非心脏手术中ERAS的现行指南和证据。在非心脏手术中,ERAS已被证明可以改善各种结果,包括ICU住院时间、患者满意度和疼痛管理。心脏手术的ERAS也显示出令人鼓舞的结果,包括缩短ICU和住院时间,减少术后阿片类药物使用,加快恢复时间。然而,研究之间的共识有限,特别是关于其对发病率和死亡率的影响,报告的结果不一。此外,关于ERAS在微创心脏手术中的疗效的有限数据使得很难建立这些手术的良好支持指南。尽管有其局限性,ERAS在心脏手术中的总体效果仍然是有希望的。随着我们对ERAS在心脏外科中的理解和应用的不断发展,这些协议有可能重新定义心脏外科护理标准。