Association of past-year mental and physical health conditions with intentional or unintentional drug overdoses

IF 1.9 0 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Veer Vekaria , Wenna Xi , Braja G. Patra , Sean M. Murphy , Jonathan Avery , Mark Olfson , Jyotishman Pathak
{"title":"Association of past-year mental and physical health conditions with intentional or unintentional drug overdoses","authors":"Veer Vekaria ,&nbsp;Wenna Xi ,&nbsp;Braja G. Patra ,&nbsp;Sean M. Murphy ,&nbsp;Jonathan Avery ,&nbsp;Mark Olfson ,&nbsp;Jyotishman Pathak","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2025.209792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Recent studies have explored the role of suicidal behavior in drug overdoses; however, differentiating intentional versus unintentional overdoses using large-scale, real-world electronic health records (EHRs) remains under-investigated. This study compared individuals with intentional or unintentional drug overdoses based on (1) demographic characteristics, (2) past-year diagnoses of mental and physical health conditions, and (3) the number and types of substances involved.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort analysis used EHRs derived from five health systems across New York City. The study identified patients with an incident overdose encounter between 2011 and 2019 based on ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes, then stratified them as ‘intentional’ or ‘unintentional’ according to the intent specified by the ICD code. ICD codes also extracted past-year substance use disorders (SUDs), suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs), psychiatric disorders, and chronic conditions. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, and race/ethnicity evaluated clinical predictors of an intentional overdose, and odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) estimated effect sizes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study identified 9622 patients, including 1737 (18.1 %) with an intentional overdose and 7885 (81.9 %) with an unintentional overdose. Intentional overdose patients (38.8 ± 19.8 years) were younger than unintentional overdose patients (53.3 ± 20.1 years). Women comprised the majority of intentional (67.6 %) and unintentional (52.4 %) overdose patients. An intentional overdose was more likely than an unintentional overdose in patients with past-year alcohol use disorder (OR: 1.94 [95 % CI: 1.54–2.44]), STBs (3.63 [2.90–4.54]), and psychiatric disorders (2.92 [2.51–3.39]), and less likely in those with past-year chronic conditions (0.50 [0.43–0.58]) (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Finally, intentional compared with unintentional overdoses were commonly observed during emergency department encounters (2.10 [1.87–2.35]) and involved multiple substances (19.8 %) such as non-opioid pain relievers (8.63 [7.30–10.21]), sedative-hypnotics (2.49 [2.04–3.04]), and benzodiazepines (3.42 [2.77–4.21]), whereas most unintentional overdoses involved a single substance (92.9 %) (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Younger patients, often with mental health and SUD problems, have a relatively higher risk of intentional overdose, while older patients with chronic health conditions are more prone to unintentional overdose. Understanding the distinct mechanisms driving overdose intent is vital for tailoring interventions, given the greater risk of suicide death following a nonfatal intentional overdose.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 209792"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875925001717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Recent studies have explored the role of suicidal behavior in drug overdoses; however, differentiating intentional versus unintentional overdoses using large-scale, real-world electronic health records (EHRs) remains under-investigated. This study compared individuals with intentional or unintentional drug overdoses based on (1) demographic characteristics, (2) past-year diagnoses of mental and physical health conditions, and (3) the number and types of substances involved.

Methods

This retrospective cohort analysis used EHRs derived from five health systems across New York City. The study identified patients with an incident overdose encounter between 2011 and 2019 based on ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes, then stratified them as ‘intentional’ or ‘unintentional’ according to the intent specified by the ICD code. ICD codes also extracted past-year substance use disorders (SUDs), suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs), psychiatric disorders, and chronic conditions. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, and race/ethnicity evaluated clinical predictors of an intentional overdose, and odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) estimated effect sizes.

Results

The study identified 9622 patients, including 1737 (18.1 %) with an intentional overdose and 7885 (81.9 %) with an unintentional overdose. Intentional overdose patients (38.8 ± 19.8 years) were younger than unintentional overdose patients (53.3 ± 20.1 years). Women comprised the majority of intentional (67.6 %) and unintentional (52.4 %) overdose patients. An intentional overdose was more likely than an unintentional overdose in patients with past-year alcohol use disorder (OR: 1.94 [95 % CI: 1.54–2.44]), STBs (3.63 [2.90–4.54]), and psychiatric disorders (2.92 [2.51–3.39]), and less likely in those with past-year chronic conditions (0.50 [0.43–0.58]) (p < 0.001). Finally, intentional compared with unintentional overdoses were commonly observed during emergency department encounters (2.10 [1.87–2.35]) and involved multiple substances (19.8 %) such as non-opioid pain relievers (8.63 [7.30–10.21]), sedative-hypnotics (2.49 [2.04–3.04]), and benzodiazepines (3.42 [2.77–4.21]), whereas most unintentional overdoses involved a single substance (92.9 %) (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Younger patients, often with mental health and SUD problems, have a relatively higher risk of intentional overdose, while older patients with chronic health conditions are more prone to unintentional overdose. Understanding the distinct mechanisms driving overdose intent is vital for tailoring interventions, given the greater risk of suicide death following a nonfatal intentional overdose.
过去一年的精神和身体健康状况与有意或无意药物过量的关系。
最近的研究探讨了自杀行为在药物过量中的作用;然而,使用大规模、真实世界的电子健康记录(EHRs)来区分有意和无意的过量用药仍有待研究。这项研究比较了有意或无意药物过量的个体,基于(1)人口统计学特征,(2)过去一年的精神和身体健康状况诊断,以及(3)所涉及物质的数量和类型。方法:本回顾性队列分析使用来自纽约市五个卫生系统的电子病历。该研究根据ICD-9和ICD-10代码确定了2011年至2019年期间发生意外服药过量的患者,然后根据ICD代码指定的意图将其分为“有意”或“无意”。ICD代码还提取了过去一年的物质使用障碍(SUDs)、自杀念头和行为(STBs)、精神障碍和慢性病。调整了年龄、性别和种族/民族的多变量logistic回归模型评估了故意过量用药的临床预测因素,优势比(ORs)和95% %置信区间(CIs)估计了效应大小。结果:该研究确定了9622例患者,其中1737例(18.1 %)为故意用药过量,7885例(81.9 %)为非故意用药过量。故意用药过量患者(38.8 ± 19.8 岁)比非故意用药过量患者(53.3 ± 20.1 岁)年轻。女性占故意(67.6% %)和无意(52.4 %)过量患者的大多数。在过去一年的酒精使用障碍(OR: 1.94[95 % CI: 1.54-2.44])、stb(3.63[2.90-4.54])和精神障碍(2.92[2.51-3.39])患者中,故意过量的可能性高于无意过量(p ),而在过去一年的慢性疾病患者中,故意过量的可能性较低(0.50[0.43-0.58])。年轻患者通常有心理健康和SUD问题,有意过量服用的风险相对较高,而患有慢性疾病的老年患者更容易意外过量服用。考虑到非致命性故意服药过量后自杀死亡的风险更大,了解导致服药过量意图的不同机制对于调整干预措施至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment Biological Psychiatry, Neuroscience (General), Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信