A Multicentric Analysis of a Pre-Ecographic Score in Pregnancy: Time for a Dedicated Classification System.

IF 2.2
Gianluca Campobasso, Fabio Castellana, Annalisa Tempesta, Alice Bottai, Annachiara Scatigno, Elisa Rizzo, Francesca Petrillo, Grazia Cappello, Prisco Piscitelli, Roberta Zupo
{"title":"A Multicentric Analysis of a Pre-Ecographic Score in Pregnancy: Time for a Dedicated Classification System.","authors":"Gianluca Campobasso, Fabio Castellana, Annalisa Tempesta, Alice Bottai, Annachiara Scatigno, Elisa Rizzo, Francesca Petrillo, Grazia Cappello, Prisco Piscitelli, Roberta Zupo","doi":"10.3390/epidemiologia6030039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives</b>: The objectives are to evaluate the influence of different maternal characteristics on ultrasound image quality and operator satisfaction, and to assess, preliminarily, a rating scale to stratify the difficulty level of ultrasound examination in early gestation. <b>Methods</b>: A multicentric observational study of ultrasound scans was carried out on singleton pregnant women undergoing routine gestational ultrasound at 11-14 weeks and 19-21 weeks of gestation at two Prenatal Care Centers in the Apulia region (Southern Italy). Inclusion criteria included the presence of one or more limiting features, i.e., obesity, retroverted uterus, myomas, previous abdominal surgery, and limited echo-absorption. Each woman was given an overall pre-echographic limiting score from 0 to 9. The outcome measure was the operator's satisfaction with the examination, scored on a Likert scale. Nested linear regression models (raw, semi- and fully adjusted) were built for each of the two trimesters on the pre-ecographic limiting score (0-9 points) as dependent variables, with the operator's satisfaction as the regressor. <b>Results</b>: The whole sample included 445 pregnant women. The two-center samples did not show statistically different baseline features. The operator's satisfaction with the sonographic examination was significantly (and inversely) related to the pre-echographic limiting score, regardless of the mother's age, the operator performing the ultrasound, the Hospital Center where the ultrasound examination was performed, and the duration of the sonographic examination. <b>Conclusions</b>: A number of maternal conditions need to be monitored for good ultrasound performance; using a specific rating scale to stratify the level of difficulty of the ultrasound examination at early gestation could represent a potentially useful tool, although it requires further validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":72944,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiolgia (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"6 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12371941/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiolgia (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/epidemiologia6030039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives are to evaluate the influence of different maternal characteristics on ultrasound image quality and operator satisfaction, and to assess, preliminarily, a rating scale to stratify the difficulty level of ultrasound examination in early gestation. Methods: A multicentric observational study of ultrasound scans was carried out on singleton pregnant women undergoing routine gestational ultrasound at 11-14 weeks and 19-21 weeks of gestation at two Prenatal Care Centers in the Apulia region (Southern Italy). Inclusion criteria included the presence of one or more limiting features, i.e., obesity, retroverted uterus, myomas, previous abdominal surgery, and limited echo-absorption. Each woman was given an overall pre-echographic limiting score from 0 to 9. The outcome measure was the operator's satisfaction with the examination, scored on a Likert scale. Nested linear regression models (raw, semi- and fully adjusted) were built for each of the two trimesters on the pre-ecographic limiting score (0-9 points) as dependent variables, with the operator's satisfaction as the regressor. Results: The whole sample included 445 pregnant women. The two-center samples did not show statistically different baseline features. The operator's satisfaction with the sonographic examination was significantly (and inversely) related to the pre-echographic limiting score, regardless of the mother's age, the operator performing the ultrasound, the Hospital Center where the ultrasound examination was performed, and the duration of the sonographic examination. Conclusions: A number of maternal conditions need to be monitored for good ultrasound performance; using a specific rating scale to stratify the level of difficulty of the ultrasound examination at early gestation could represent a potentially useful tool, although it requires further validation.

妊娠前地理评分的多中心分析:建立专用分类系统的时间。
目的:探讨不同产妇特征对超声图像质量及操作人员满意度的影响,并初步编制分级量表,对早期妊娠超声检查的难度进行分级。方法:在意大利南部普利亚地区的两个产前护理中心对妊娠11-14周和19-21周接受常规超声检查的单胎孕妇进行多中心超声扫描观察研究。纳入标准包括存在一个或多个限制性特征,即肥胖、子宫后倾、肌瘤、既往腹部手术和有限的回声吸收。每位妇女的超声前极限评分从0到9。结果测量是操作者对检查的满意度,以李克特量表评分。嵌套的线性回归模型(原始,半和完全调整)为每两个三个月建立的前地理限制评分(0-9分)作为因变量,以操作者的满意度为回归量。结果:共纳入孕妇445例。双中心样本没有显示统计学上不同的基线特征。无论母亲的年龄、进行超声检查的操作员、进行超声检查的医院中心以及超声检查的持续时间如何,操作人员对超声检查的满意度与超声前极限评分呈显著(负相关)相关。结论:产妇的多种情况需要监测,以获得良好的超声表现;使用特定的分级量表来分层早期妊娠超声检查的困难程度可能是一种潜在的有用工具,尽管它需要进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信