Precision medicine on a budget in Africa: using existing genetic data to mitigate adverse drug reactions to conventional cancer drugs.

IF 3.9 Q2 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Frontiers in bioinformatics Pub Date : 2025-08-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fbinf.2025.1555637
Alexandra Lindsey Djomkam Zune, Charles Ochieng' Olwal, Emmanuel Agbeli, Abdoulaye Baniré Diallo, Emmanuella Amoako, Yaw Bediako, Lily Paemka
{"title":"Precision medicine on a budget in Africa: using existing genetic data to mitigate adverse drug reactions to conventional cancer drugs.","authors":"Alexandra Lindsey Djomkam Zune, Charles Ochieng' Olwal, Emmanuel Agbeli, Abdoulaye Baniré Diallo, Emmanuella Amoako, Yaw Bediako, Lily Paemka","doi":"10.3389/fbinf.2025.1555637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Variations in drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters are associated with adverse drug reactions (ADRs). ADRs to cancer drugs can differ among populations owing to environmental and genetic differences. Due to limited resources and prohibitive costs associated with drug development, African countries rely on cancer drugs developed from non-African genetic backgrounds. Black Africans carry a high burden of ADRs partly because of the use of poorly optimized drugs. Black Africans are the least studied population despite being the most genetically diverse. There is a profound lack of pharmacogenetic studies in Black African populations, necessitating an urgent need for pharmacogenomic studies in Black African populations to optimize dosing and minimize ADRs. Using two common generic cancer drugs, capecitabine and cyclophosphamide, we leveraged the PharmGKB platform and several genomic databases to highlight the need for pharmacogenomic studies in Africa. Our computational approach identifies previously reported and unreported toxicity- and efficacy-associated variants that are overrepresented or underrepresented in Black Africans relative to other ethnicities. These findings suggest that capecitabine and cyclophosphamide may not work optimally and/or may predispose Black Africans to ADRs. This underscores the need for population-based drug screening and development to minimize ADRs and guarantee better treatment outcomes. Since Black Africans are currently underrepresented in genomic studies, African scientists could adopt our low-cost approach to evaluate the suitability of existing drugs for treating diseases. However, in the long term, African scientists must initiate large-scale genomic studies that will drive the discovery of African-tailored drugs and promote the implementation of precision medicine on the continent.</p>","PeriodicalId":73066,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in bioinformatics","volume":"5 ","pages":"1555637"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12390963/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fbinf.2025.1555637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Variations in drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters are associated with adverse drug reactions (ADRs). ADRs to cancer drugs can differ among populations owing to environmental and genetic differences. Due to limited resources and prohibitive costs associated with drug development, African countries rely on cancer drugs developed from non-African genetic backgrounds. Black Africans carry a high burden of ADRs partly because of the use of poorly optimized drugs. Black Africans are the least studied population despite being the most genetically diverse. There is a profound lack of pharmacogenetic studies in Black African populations, necessitating an urgent need for pharmacogenomic studies in Black African populations to optimize dosing and minimize ADRs. Using two common generic cancer drugs, capecitabine and cyclophosphamide, we leveraged the PharmGKB platform and several genomic databases to highlight the need for pharmacogenomic studies in Africa. Our computational approach identifies previously reported and unreported toxicity- and efficacy-associated variants that are overrepresented or underrepresented in Black Africans relative to other ethnicities. These findings suggest that capecitabine and cyclophosphamide may not work optimally and/or may predispose Black Africans to ADRs. This underscores the need for population-based drug screening and development to minimize ADRs and guarantee better treatment outcomes. Since Black Africans are currently underrepresented in genomic studies, African scientists could adopt our low-cost approach to evaluate the suitability of existing drugs for treating diseases. However, in the long term, African scientists must initiate large-scale genomic studies that will drive the discovery of African-tailored drugs and promote the implementation of precision medicine on the continent.

精准医疗在非洲的预算:利用现有的基因数据来减轻对传统癌症药物的不良反应。
药物代谢酶和转运体的变化与药物不良反应(adr)有关。由于环境和基因的差异,不同人群对抗癌药物的不良反应可能不同。由于资源有限和与药物开发相关的高昂费用,非洲国家依赖于从非非洲遗传背景中开发的癌症药物。非洲黑人的不良反应负担很高,部分原因是使用了优化不佳的药物。非洲黑人是研究最少的人群,尽管他们的基因最多样化。非洲黑人人群的药物遗传学研究严重缺乏,迫切需要在非洲黑人人群中进行药物基因组学研究,以优化剂量和减少不良反应。我们利用两种常见的非专利抗癌药物卡培他滨和环磷酰胺,利用PharmGKB平台和几个基因组数据库来强调非洲药物基因组学研究的必要性。我们的计算方法确定了先前报道的和未报道的毒性和有效性相关变异,这些变异在非洲黑人中相对于其他种族的代表性过高或不足。这些发现表明卡培他滨和环磷酰胺可能没有最佳效果和/或可能使非洲黑人容易发生不良反应。这强调了以人群为基础的药物筛选和开发的必要性,以尽量减少不良反应并保证更好的治疗结果。由于非洲黑人目前在基因组研究中的代表性不足,非洲科学家可以采用我们的低成本方法来评估现有药物治疗疾病的适用性。然而,从长远来看,非洲科学家必须启动大规模的基因组研究,这将推动发现适合非洲的药物,并促进精准医学在非洲大陆的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信