Fidelity Assessment of the Multiple Family Group Intervention for Disruptive Behavioral Disorders Among Children and Adolescents in Uganda.

Anita Kabarambi, Samuel Kizito, Joshua Kiyingi, Phionah Namatovu, Portia Nartey, Proscovia Nabunya, Fred M Ssewamala
{"title":"Fidelity Assessment of the Multiple Family Group Intervention for Disruptive Behavioral Disorders Among Children and Adolescents in Uganda.","authors":"Anita Kabarambi, Samuel Kizito, Joshua Kiyingi, Phionah Namatovu, Portia Nartey, Proscovia Nabunya, Fred M Ssewamala","doi":"10.1080/23794925.2025.2485082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Globally, one in seven 10-19-year-olds experiences a mental disorder, accounting for 13% of the global burden of disease in this age group. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), many children and adolescents face serious mental health disorders, including disruptive behavioral disorders (DBDs), which often begin in childhood and adolescence. Between 2016 and 2021, a large cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted in Uganda under the SMART Africa initiative to examine the impact and implementation of the Multiple Family Group (MFG) intervention for children with behavioral problems and their families. The intervention proved efficacious in reducing impaired functioning and had the potential to improve family dynamics, whether delivered by community members or parents. With limited mental health experts in Uganda, understanding the fidelity of this mental health intervention with task shifting will be critical.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study systematically assesses the fidelity of the MFG intervention, focusing on the dose dimension, which includes the frequency and duration of intervention sessions and adherence to the intervention manual.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The fidelity assessment was embedded within the SMART Africa trial and conducted after every MFG session for facilitators and caregivers and at 25% of the sessions (sessions 4, 8, 12, and 16) by research staff. Facilitators and participants completed a 5-minute fidelity assessment checklist at the end of each session, while independent fidelity observations were conducted for 25% of the sessions by trained research assistants. Data were analyzed to assess the relationship between planned and actual implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, the MFG intervention included 1,290 participants and caregivers, with children having an average age of 12 years and most caregivers being female with a primary education. Each session had an average attendance of over 70%, with 33% of participants attending all 15 sessions and 77.4% attending at least 11 sessions, indicating good adherence. Participants completed 16,470 fidelity assessment surveys, showing excellent coverage of intervention content (95%-100%), which improved over time. Research assistants reported high fidelity, with 567 assessments showing 93%-98% coverage. Facilitators filled out 2,189 surveys, with a mean session component coverage of 98.6%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The fidelity assessment indicates that the MFG intervention was well-delivered in Uganda. High adherence and positive feedback affirm the intervention's successful implementation and support for task shifting mental health interventions while maintaining high fidelity in countries with limited mental health experts.</p>","PeriodicalId":72992,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12393158/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23794925.2025.2485082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Globally, one in seven 10-19-year-olds experiences a mental disorder, accounting for 13% of the global burden of disease in this age group. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), many children and adolescents face serious mental health disorders, including disruptive behavioral disorders (DBDs), which often begin in childhood and adolescence. Between 2016 and 2021, a large cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted in Uganda under the SMART Africa initiative to examine the impact and implementation of the Multiple Family Group (MFG) intervention for children with behavioral problems and their families. The intervention proved efficacious in reducing impaired functioning and had the potential to improve family dynamics, whether delivered by community members or parents. With limited mental health experts in Uganda, understanding the fidelity of this mental health intervention with task shifting will be critical.

Objective: This study systematically assesses the fidelity of the MFG intervention, focusing on the dose dimension, which includes the frequency and duration of intervention sessions and adherence to the intervention manual.

Methods: The fidelity assessment was embedded within the SMART Africa trial and conducted after every MFG session for facilitators and caregivers and at 25% of the sessions (sessions 4, 8, 12, and 16) by research staff. Facilitators and participants completed a 5-minute fidelity assessment checklist at the end of each session, while independent fidelity observations were conducted for 25% of the sessions by trained research assistants. Data were analyzed to assess the relationship between planned and actual implementation.

Results: In this study, the MFG intervention included 1,290 participants and caregivers, with children having an average age of 12 years and most caregivers being female with a primary education. Each session had an average attendance of over 70%, with 33% of participants attending all 15 sessions and 77.4% attending at least 11 sessions, indicating good adherence. Participants completed 16,470 fidelity assessment surveys, showing excellent coverage of intervention content (95%-100%), which improved over time. Research assistants reported high fidelity, with 567 assessments showing 93%-98% coverage. Facilitators filled out 2,189 surveys, with a mean session component coverage of 98.6%.

Conclusion: The fidelity assessment indicates that the MFG intervention was well-delivered in Uganda. High adherence and positive feedback affirm the intervention's successful implementation and support for task shifting mental health interventions while maintaining high fidelity in countries with limited mental health experts.

乌干达儿童和青少年破坏性行为障碍多家庭团体干预的保真度评估。
背景:在全球范围内,每七名10-19岁的青少年中就有一人患有精神障碍,占该年龄组全球疾病负担的13%。在低收入和中等收入国家,许多儿童和青少年面临严重的精神健康障碍,包括破坏性行为障碍(DBDs),通常始于童年和青春期。2016年至2021年期间,在SMART非洲倡议下,在乌干达进行了一项大型集群随机对照试验,以检查多家庭小组(MFG)干预对有行为问题的儿童及其家庭的影响和实施情况。事实证明,无论是由社区成员还是父母提供的干预措施,在减少功能受损方面是有效的,并有可能改善家庭动态。由于乌干达的精神卫生专家有限,了解这种任务转移的精神卫生干预的保真度将是至关重要的。目的:本研究系统地评估了MFG干预的保真度,重点关注剂量维度,包括干预的频率和持续时间以及对干预手册的依从性。方法:保真度评估嵌入SMART非洲试验中,并在辅导员和护理人员的每次MFG会议之后以及25%的会议(第4、8、12和16次会议)由研究人员进行。主持人和参与者在每次会议结束时完成一份5分钟的保真度评估清单,而25%的会议由训练有素的研究助理进行独立的保真度观察。分析数据以评估计划与实际执行之间的关系。结果:在本研究中,MFG干预包括1,290名参与者和照顾者,儿童平均年龄为12岁,大多数照顾者为受过小学教育的女性。每个疗程的平均出勤率超过70%,33%的参与者参加了所有15次疗程,77.4%的参与者至少参加了11次疗程,表明依从性良好。参与者完成了16470份保真度评估问卷,显示出干预内容的良好覆盖率(95%-100%),并随着时间的推移而提高。研究助理报告了高保真度,567次评估显示93%-98%的覆盖率。主持人填写了2189份调查问卷,平均会议内容覆盖率为98.6%。结论:保真度评估表明,MFG干预在乌干达实施得很好。高依从性和积极反馈肯定了干预措施的成功实施和对任务转移精神卫生干预措施的支持,同时在精神卫生专家有限的国家保持高保真度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信