Navigating fragmented care: a qualitative study on multimorbidity management challenges in Beijing's tiered healthcare system.

IF 2.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Conglei You, Jingyi Zhao, Tengyang Fan, Lingling Wang, Lijuan Zhang, Guohao Zhao, Huan Tang, Na Wang, Xu Yang, Mi Yao
{"title":"Navigating fragmented care: a qualitative study on multimorbidity management challenges in Beijing's tiered healthcare system.","authors":"Conglei You, Jingyi Zhao, Tengyang Fan, Lingling Wang, Lijuan Zhang, Guohao Zhao, Huan Tang, Na Wang, Xu Yang, Mi Yao","doi":"10.1186/s12875-025-02967-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multimorbidity is a growing public health concern, especially in countries with aging populations. Although a tiered healthcare system has been implemented to improve primary care, managing patients with multimorbidity has been challenging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study conducted focus group discussions involving 21 patients with multimorbidity in Beijing via a flexible topic guide to explore their experiences. Participants were sampled from urban and rural areas, ensuring a diverse representation of demographics and health conditions. The data were analyzed using the framework method. The themes and subthemes were identified through iterative coding and discussion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four main themes emerged: (1) Living with multimorbidity, where patients view chronic conditions as an inevitable part of aging but struggle with self-management, particularly medication adherence and lifestyle modifications; (2) healthcare system challenges, driven by ineffective tiered policies and digital exclusion, especially among elderly patients; (3) financial burdens, with rural patients facing greater out-of-pocket costs due to insurance inequities and policy-induced strains; and (4) doctor-patient relationships, where communication gaps and a lack of continuity hinder patient-centered care. Patients emphasized the need for better care coordination, financial support, and empathetic communication.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study underscores systemic gaps in China's healthcare system for multimorbidity care. To address these issues, policymakers should prioritize (1) strengthening primary care coordination through multidisciplinary teams, (2) expanding financial protection for chronic disease management to reduce urban-rural disparities, and (3) training providers in patient-centered communication and shared decision-making. These actionable steps can serve as a blueprint for LMICs aiming to build integrated, patient-centered systems for multimorbidity management.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"26 1","pages":"270"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12392530/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02967-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multimorbidity is a growing public health concern, especially in countries with aging populations. Although a tiered healthcare system has been implemented to improve primary care, managing patients with multimorbidity has been challenging.

Methods: This study conducted focus group discussions involving 21 patients with multimorbidity in Beijing via a flexible topic guide to explore their experiences. Participants were sampled from urban and rural areas, ensuring a diverse representation of demographics and health conditions. The data were analyzed using the framework method. The themes and subthemes were identified through iterative coding and discussion.

Results: Four main themes emerged: (1) Living with multimorbidity, where patients view chronic conditions as an inevitable part of aging but struggle with self-management, particularly medication adherence and lifestyle modifications; (2) healthcare system challenges, driven by ineffective tiered policies and digital exclusion, especially among elderly patients; (3) financial burdens, with rural patients facing greater out-of-pocket costs due to insurance inequities and policy-induced strains; and (4) doctor-patient relationships, where communication gaps and a lack of continuity hinder patient-centered care. Patients emphasized the need for better care coordination, financial support, and empathetic communication.

Conclusion: This study underscores systemic gaps in China's healthcare system for multimorbidity care. To address these issues, policymakers should prioritize (1) strengthening primary care coordination through multidisciplinary teams, (2) expanding financial protection for chronic disease management to reduce urban-rural disparities, and (3) training providers in patient-centered communication and shared decision-making. These actionable steps can serve as a blueprint for LMICs aiming to build integrated, patient-centered systems for multimorbidity management.

导航碎片化医疗:北京分层医疗体系中多病管理挑战的定性研究。
背景:多病是一个日益严重的公共卫生问题,特别是在人口老龄化的国家。虽然已经实施了分层医疗保健系统,以改善初级保健,但管理多病患者一直具有挑战性。方法:本研究采用灵活的主题指南,对21例北京地区多病患者进行焦点小组讨论,探讨其经验。参与者从城市和农村地区抽样,以确保人口和健康状况的多样化代表性。采用框架法对数据进行分析。通过迭代编码和讨论确定了主题和副主题。结果:出现了四个主要主题:(1)多重疾病患者,他们将慢性病视为衰老不可避免的一部分,但却难以自我管理,特别是药物依从性和生活方式的改变;(2)由无效的分级政策和数字排斥驱动的医疗保健系统挑战,特别是在老年患者中;(3)经济负担,由于保险不公平和政策压力,农村患者面临更大的自付费用;(4)医患关系,沟通差距和缺乏连续性阻碍了以患者为中心的护理。患者强调需要更好的护理协调、财政支持和移情沟通。结论:本研究强调了中国医疗保健系统在多病护理方面的系统性差距。为了解决这些问题,决策者应优先考虑(1)通过多学科团队加强初级保健协调;(2)扩大慢性病管理的财政保障,以缩小城乡差距;(3)培训提供者以患者为中心的沟通和共同决策。这些可行的步骤可以作为旨在建立以患者为中心的综合多病管理系统的中低收入国家的蓝图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信