Ethical Reflections on Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Care Practices.

IF 1.8
Giulia Ricchezze, Luca Tomassini, Mauro Bacci
{"title":"Ethical Reflections on Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Care Practices.","authors":"Giulia Ricchezze, Luca Tomassini, Mauro Bacci","doi":"10.1177/2752535X251370928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics into disability care presents transformative opportunities while simultaneously raising pressing ethical concerns. Issues related to autonomy, human dignity, and equitable access require careful consideration, particularly as these technologies reshape the dynamics of care delivery and clinical relationships. PurposeDrawing on an interdisciplinary approach that synthesizes insights from bioethical literature, illustrative case studies, and expert perspectives from healthcare, law, and technology, this reflection examines the ethical landscape of AI-supported rehabilitation and assistance. Particular attention is given to risks such as algorithmic bias, over-reliance on automation, and the potential erosion of the human dimension in care. A biopsychosocial model serves as a guiding framework to analyze how technological systems intersect with the lived experiences of individuals with disabilities. Ethical tensions emerge around personalized care, transparency in decision-making, and the inclusivity of data and design processes.ConclusionsThe analysis emphasizes the need for governance models that embed ethical safeguards and promote fairness, while also encouraging participatory design involving patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals. By situating technological developments within broader socio-political and clinical contexts, this reflection identifies pathways toward a more equitable and human-centered integration of AI. Recommendations include investment in inclusive datasets, the development of fairness-aware algorithms, and the establishment of regulatory mechanisms that align innovation with fundamental rights and principles of social justice in healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":72648,"journal":{"name":"Community health equity research & policy","volume":" ","pages":"2752535X251370928"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community health equity research & policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2752535X251370928","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundThe integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics into disability care presents transformative opportunities while simultaneously raising pressing ethical concerns. Issues related to autonomy, human dignity, and equitable access require careful consideration, particularly as these technologies reshape the dynamics of care delivery and clinical relationships. PurposeDrawing on an interdisciplinary approach that synthesizes insights from bioethical literature, illustrative case studies, and expert perspectives from healthcare, law, and technology, this reflection examines the ethical landscape of AI-supported rehabilitation and assistance. Particular attention is given to risks such as algorithmic bias, over-reliance on automation, and the potential erosion of the human dimension in care. A biopsychosocial model serves as a guiding framework to analyze how technological systems intersect with the lived experiences of individuals with disabilities. Ethical tensions emerge around personalized care, transparency in decision-making, and the inclusivity of data and design processes.ConclusionsThe analysis emphasizes the need for governance models that embed ethical safeguards and promote fairness, while also encouraging participatory design involving patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals. By situating technological developments within broader socio-political and clinical contexts, this reflection identifies pathways toward a more equitable and human-centered integration of AI. Recommendations include investment in inclusive datasets, the development of fairness-aware algorithms, and the establishment of regulatory mechanisms that align innovation with fundamental rights and principles of social justice in healthcare.

人工智能在护理实践中的伦理思考
人工智能(AI)和机器人技术在残疾人护理中的整合带来了变革性的机遇,同时也引发了紧迫的伦理问题。自主性、人类尊严和公平获取等相关问题需要仔细考虑,特别是这些技术重塑了护理提供和临床关系的动态。利用跨学科方法,综合生物伦理文献、说明性案例研究以及来自医疗保健、法律和技术的专家观点,本反思研究了人工智能支持的康复和援助的伦理景观。特别要注意的风险包括算法偏差、过度依赖自动化以及护理中对人的维度的潜在侵蚀。一个生物心理社会模型作为一个指导框架来分析技术系统如何与残疾人的生活经验相交。在个性化护理、决策透明以及数据和设计过程的包容性方面,出现了伦理紧张关系。该分析强调需要建立包含道德保障和促进公平的治理模式,同时鼓励涉及患者、护理人员和医疗保健专业人员的参与式设计。通过将技术发展置于更广泛的社会政治和临床背景下,这种反思确定了通往更公平和以人为中心的人工智能整合的途径。建议包括投资于包容性数据集,开发公平意识算法,以及建立监管机制,使创新与卫生保健领域的基本权利和社会正义原则保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信