Modulating Treatment Outcomes of Patients with Solid Tumors in Immunotherapy Trials: A Drug Interaction Analysis from a Phase I Unit.

IF 3.3 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Camila Braganca Xavier, Clark R Andersen, JoAnn Lim, Julian H Slade, Stacie A Bean, Lei Kang, Hung Le, Apostolia M Tsimberidou, Aung Naing, David S Hong, Ecaterina E Dumbrava, Jordi Rodon Ahnert, Paula R Pohlmann, Sarina A Piha-Paul, Stephane Champiat, Timothy A Yap, Tin-Yun Tang, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Siqing Fu
{"title":"Modulating Treatment Outcomes of Patients with Solid Tumors in Immunotherapy Trials: A Drug Interaction Analysis from a Phase I Unit.","authors":"Camila Braganca Xavier, Clark R Andersen, JoAnn Lim, Julian H Slade, Stacie A Bean, Lei Kang, Hung Le, Apostolia M Tsimberidou, Aung Naing, David S Hong, Ecaterina E Dumbrava, Jordi Rodon Ahnert, Paula R Pohlmann, Sarina A Piha-Paul, Stephane Champiat, Timothy A Yap, Tin-Yun Tang, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Siqing Fu","doi":"10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-25-0033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Concurrent use of medications can modulate the effectiveness of immunotherapy. Although this interaction is well documented for immune checkpoint inhibitors, whether this occurs with new experimental compounds has not been evaluated.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A computerized data extraction tool was used to collect clinical data and identify the prescription of a predefined set of medications within 30 days of immunotherapy infusion in the Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. The primary endpoints were median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival. Tumor responses were assessed using RECIST.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 897 patients. The most prevalent tumor types were colorectal (24.5%), head and neck (10.5%), and pancreatic (9.4%). The immunotherapy administered consisted of monoclonal antibodies and fusion proteins (64.7%), immune modulators (IM; 20.8%), combinations of IMs and antibodies (9.2%), and oncolytic viruses and cancer vaccines (5.3%). The most frequently prescribed drugs were narcotics (70.5%), antiemetics (49.1%), antihistamines (34.6%), antibiotics (31.2%), and proton pump inhibitors (PPI; 28.7%). Patients receiving antihistamines exhibited increased rates of stable disease and partial response (χ2 8.48; P = 0.014) on the IMs and antibodies combination. The benefit of antihistamines was confirmed in a multivariate analysis of OS [HR, 0.752 (95% CI, 0.603-0.938); P = 0.012]. For patients with colorectal cancer, PPI use was associated with shortened survival, with a median OS of 5.2 months with PPI use and 8.6 months without it (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings highlight the need for strategies to guide concurrent medication choices for patients receiving immunotherapy in early-phase trials.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Concurrent administration of antihistamines correlates with enhanced survival in patients receiving experimental immunotherapy for cancer. Conversely, PPI use diminishes survival in patients with colorectal cancer. These findings highlight how tumor immunogenicity and drug interactions can modulate response and survival outcomes, offering new insights to optimize investigational immunotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":72516,"journal":{"name":"Cancer research communications","volume":" ","pages":"1631-1641"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12434680/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer research communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-25-0033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Concurrent use of medications can modulate the effectiveness of immunotherapy. Although this interaction is well documented for immune checkpoint inhibitors, whether this occurs with new experimental compounds has not been evaluated.

Patients and methods: A computerized data extraction tool was used to collect clinical data and identify the prescription of a predefined set of medications within 30 days of immunotherapy infusion in the Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. The primary endpoints were median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival. Tumor responses were assessed using RECIST.

Results: We identified 897 patients. The most prevalent tumor types were colorectal (24.5%), head and neck (10.5%), and pancreatic (9.4%). The immunotherapy administered consisted of monoclonal antibodies and fusion proteins (64.7%), immune modulators (IM; 20.8%), combinations of IMs and antibodies (9.2%), and oncolytic viruses and cancer vaccines (5.3%). The most frequently prescribed drugs were narcotics (70.5%), antiemetics (49.1%), antihistamines (34.6%), antibiotics (31.2%), and proton pump inhibitors (PPI; 28.7%). Patients receiving antihistamines exhibited increased rates of stable disease and partial response (χ2 8.48; P = 0.014) on the IMs and antibodies combination. The benefit of antihistamines was confirmed in a multivariate analysis of OS [HR, 0.752 (95% CI, 0.603-0.938); P = 0.012]. For patients with colorectal cancer, PPI use was associated with shortened survival, with a median OS of 5.2 months with PPI use and 8.6 months without it (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Our findings highlight the need for strategies to guide concurrent medication choices for patients receiving immunotherapy in early-phase trials.

Significance: Concurrent administration of antihistamines correlates with enhanced survival in patients receiving experimental immunotherapy for cancer. Conversely, PPI use diminishes survival in patients with colorectal cancer. These findings highlight how tumor immunogenicity and drug interactions can modulate response and survival outcomes, offering new insights to optimize investigational immunotherapy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在免疫治疗试验中调节实体瘤患者的治疗结果:来自1期单位的药物相互作用分析。
同时使用药物可以调节免疫治疗的有效性。尽管这种相互作用在免疫检查点抑制剂中有很好的文献记载,但这种相互作用是否发生在新的实验化合物中尚未得到评估。使用计算机数据提取工具收集临床数据,并在德克萨斯大学MD安德森癌症中心研究癌症治疗部门在免疫治疗输注30天内确定一组预定义药物的处方。主要终点是中位总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期。肿瘤反应用RECIST处理。我们确定了897例患者。最常见的肿瘤类型是结直肠(24.5%)、头颈部(10.5%)和胰腺(9.4%)。给予的免疫治疗包括单克隆抗体和融合蛋白(64.7%)、免疫调节剂(IMs; 20.8%)、IMs和抗体的组合(9.2%)以及溶瘤病毒和癌症疫苗(5.3%)。最常见的处方药是麻醉药品(70.5%)、止吐药(49.1%)、抗组胺药(34.6%)、抗生素(31.2%)和质子泵抑制剂(PPIs, 28.7%)。接受抗组胺药物治疗的患者在抗组胺药物和抗体联合治疗方面表现出更高的疾病稳定率和部分缓解率(卡方= 8.48;P = 0.014)。多变量OS分析证实了抗组胺药的益处(HR, 0.752 [95% CI, 0.603-0.938]; P = 0.012)。对于结直肠癌患者,使用PPI与缩短生存期相关,使用PPI的中位OS为5.2个月,未使用PPI的中位OS为8.6个月(P < 0.001)。我们的研究结果强调了在早期试验中指导接受免疫治疗的患者同时选择药物的策略的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信