Development and usability testing of an online platform for provider training and implementation of cognitive-behavioral therapy guided self-help for eating disorders.

BMC digital health Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1186/s44247-024-00140-6
Laura D'Adamo, Agatha A Laboe, Jake Goldberg, Carli P Howe, Molly Fennig Steinhoff, Bianca DePietro, Marie-Laure Firebaugh, Zafra Cooper, Denise E Wilfley, Ellen E Fitzsimmons-Craft
{"title":"Development and usability testing of an online platform for provider training and implementation of cognitive-behavioral therapy guided self-help for eating disorders.","authors":"Laura D'Adamo, Agatha A Laboe, Jake Goldberg, Carli P Howe, Molly Fennig Steinhoff, Bianca DePietro, Marie-Laure Firebaugh, Zafra Cooper, Denise E Wilfley, Ellen E Fitzsimmons-Craft","doi":"10.1186/s44247-024-00140-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most individuals with eating disorders (EDs) do not receive treatment, and those who do receive care typically do not receive evidence-based treatment, partly due to lack of accessible provider training. This study developed a novel \"all-in-one\" online platform for disseminating training for mental health providers in cognitive-behavioral therapy guided self-help (CBTgsh) for EDs and supporting its implementation. The aim of the study was to obtain usability data from the online platform prior to evaluating its effects on provider training outcomes and patient ED symptom outcomes in an open pilot trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine mental health provider participants (<i>n</i> = 4 in Cycle 1; <i>n</i> = 5 in Cycle 2) and 9 patient participants (<i>n</i> = 4 in Cycle 1; <i>n</i> = 5 in Cycle 2) were enrolled over two cycles of usability testing. In Cycle 1, we recruited providers and patients separately to complete brief platform testing sessions. In Cycle 2, we recruited provider-patient dyads; providers completed training using the platform and subsequently delivered CBTgsh to a patient for three weeks. Usability was assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS), the Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of Use Questionnaire (USE), and semi-structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interview feedback converged on two themes for providers (applicability of program for real-world use, platform structure and function) and two themes for patients (barriers and facilitators to engagement, perceived treatment effects). SUS and USE scores were in the \"average\" to \"good\" ranges across cycles.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings from this study demonstrate preliminary feasibility and acceptability of the online platform. Data collected in this study will inform further refinements to the online platform. The platform's effects on provider training outcomes and patient ED symptom outcomes will be evaluated in an open pilot trial. Given the wide treatment gap for EDs and barriers to dissemination and implementation of evidence-based treatments, the online platform represents a scalable solution that could improve access to evidence-based care for EDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":72426,"journal":{"name":"BMC digital health","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12395347/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44247-024-00140-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Most individuals with eating disorders (EDs) do not receive treatment, and those who do receive care typically do not receive evidence-based treatment, partly due to lack of accessible provider training. This study developed a novel "all-in-one" online platform for disseminating training for mental health providers in cognitive-behavioral therapy guided self-help (CBTgsh) for EDs and supporting its implementation. The aim of the study was to obtain usability data from the online platform prior to evaluating its effects on provider training outcomes and patient ED symptom outcomes in an open pilot trial.

Methods: Nine mental health provider participants (n = 4 in Cycle 1; n = 5 in Cycle 2) and 9 patient participants (n = 4 in Cycle 1; n = 5 in Cycle 2) were enrolled over two cycles of usability testing. In Cycle 1, we recruited providers and patients separately to complete brief platform testing sessions. In Cycle 2, we recruited provider-patient dyads; providers completed training using the platform and subsequently delivered CBTgsh to a patient for three weeks. Usability was assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS), the Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of Use Questionnaire (USE), and semi-structured interviews.

Results: Interview feedback converged on two themes for providers (applicability of program for real-world use, platform structure and function) and two themes for patients (barriers and facilitators to engagement, perceived treatment effects). SUS and USE scores were in the "average" to "good" ranges across cycles.

Conclusions: Findings from this study demonstrate preliminary feasibility and acceptability of the online platform. Data collected in this study will inform further refinements to the online platform. The platform's effects on provider training outcomes and patient ED symptom outcomes will be evaluated in an open pilot trial. Given the wide treatment gap for EDs and barriers to dissemination and implementation of evidence-based treatments, the online platform represents a scalable solution that could improve access to evidence-based care for EDs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

开发和可用性测试一个在线平台,用于提供者培训和实施认知行为疗法指导的饮食失调自助。
背景:大多数饮食失调(EDs)患者没有接受治疗,而那些接受治疗的患者通常没有接受循证治疗,部分原因是缺乏可获得的提供者培训。本研究开发了一种新颖的“一体化”在线平台,用于传播心理健康提供者在认知行为治疗引导自助(CBTgsh)方面的培训,并支持其实施。该研究的目的是在开放式试点试验中评估其对提供者培训结果和患者ED症状结果的影响之前,从在线平台获得可用性数据。方法:9名心理健康提供者参与者(第1周期n = 4人,第2周期n = 5人)和9名患者参与者(第1周期n = 4人,第2周期n = 5人)在两个周期内进行可用性测试。在周期1中,我们分别招募提供者和患者完成简短的平台测试。在第二阶段,我们招募了供方-患者二人组;提供者使用该平台完成了培训,随后向患者提供了三周的CBTgsh。可用性是用系统可用性量表(SUS)、有用性、满意度和易用性问卷(Use)以及半结构化访谈来评估的。结果:访谈反馈集中在两个主题上:提供者(程序对实际使用的适用性,平台结构和功能);患者(参与的障碍和促进因素,感知治疗效果)。SUS和USE评分在各个周期的“平均”到“良好”范围内。结论:本研究结果初步证明了在线平台的可行性和可接受性。本研究收集的数据将为进一步完善在线平台提供信息。该平台对提供者培训结果和患者ED症状结果的影响将在公开的试点试验中进行评估。鉴于急诊科的治疗差距很大,传播和实施循证治疗存在障碍,在线平台是一种可扩展的解决方案,可以改善急诊科获得循证护理的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信