{"title":"Development of Novel Symptom Score to Assist in Screening for Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency.","authors":"Dana M Lewis, Amanda Landers","doi":"10.3390/epidemiologia6030048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI or PEI) often goes undiagnosed or misdiagnosed due to nonspecific symptomatology. Clinicians may focus primarily on symptoms like diarrhea and steatorrhea, potentially overlooking more prevalent symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our research describes the development and evaluation of the Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency Symptom Score (EPI/PEI-SS), a novel patient-generated symptom score designed to capture a wide range of EPI-related symptoms and quantify symptoms based on frequency and severity (score ranges 0-225). This preliminary real-world study assessed the efficacy of the EPI/PEI-SS in differentiating between individuals with and without EPI. To examine disparities between participants with and without EPI, average symptom frequency, severity, and overall score relationships were assessed, as well as sub-analyses based on other health co-conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 324 participants (155 with EPI and 169 without) completed the EPI/PEI-SS online. Individuals with EPI reported significantly higher EPI/PEI-SS scores (98.11, range 1-213) indicating a greater symptom burden compared with those without EPI (38.86, range 0-163).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The EPI/PEI-SS appears to effectively differentiate between EPI and non-EPI participants, including non-EPI participants with other GI conditions. The EPI/PEI-SS demonstrates the potential to identify EPI and distinguish symptoms of EPI from other GI conditions, as evaluated with frequency and severity. Future research could replicate the study alongside fecal elastase testing, to determine whether it can be used additionally or alternatively for EPI diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":72944,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiolgia (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"6 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372056/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiolgia (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/epidemiologia6030048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI or PEI) often goes undiagnosed or misdiagnosed due to nonspecific symptomatology. Clinicians may focus primarily on symptoms like diarrhea and steatorrhea, potentially overlooking more prevalent symptoms.
Methods: Our research describes the development and evaluation of the Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency Symptom Score (EPI/PEI-SS), a novel patient-generated symptom score designed to capture a wide range of EPI-related symptoms and quantify symptoms based on frequency and severity (score ranges 0-225). This preliminary real-world study assessed the efficacy of the EPI/PEI-SS in differentiating between individuals with and without EPI. To examine disparities between participants with and without EPI, average symptom frequency, severity, and overall score relationships were assessed, as well as sub-analyses based on other health co-conditions.
Results: In total, 324 participants (155 with EPI and 169 without) completed the EPI/PEI-SS online. Individuals with EPI reported significantly higher EPI/PEI-SS scores (98.11, range 1-213) indicating a greater symptom burden compared with those without EPI (38.86, range 0-163).
Conclusions: The EPI/PEI-SS appears to effectively differentiate between EPI and non-EPI participants, including non-EPI participants with other GI conditions. The EPI/PEI-SS demonstrates the potential to identify EPI and distinguish symptoms of EPI from other GI conditions, as evaluated with frequency and severity. Future research could replicate the study alongside fecal elastase testing, to determine whether it can be used additionally or alternatively for EPI diagnosis.