Frequency Modulation Detection Thresholds are Unrelated to Individual Differences in Verbal Memory Capacity.

Auditory perception & cognition Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-13 DOI:10.1080/25742442.2025.2489912
A K Bosen, B C Kohlmeier, S E Harris, S T Neely, A M Kamerer
{"title":"Frequency Modulation Detection Thresholds are Unrelated to Individual Differences in Verbal Memory Capacity.","authors":"A K Bosen, B C Kohlmeier, S E Harris, S T Neely, A M Kamerer","doi":"10.1080/25742442.2025.2489912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Psychophysical measures of auditory sensitivity are often used to explain speech recognition outcomes. However, interpretation of performance on these tasks assumes that they are insensitive to other factors, such as cognitive ability. Recent studies have cast doubt on this assumption by observing relationships between cognition and performance on psychoacoustic tasks. Here, we examined the relationship between memory tasks and two tasks designed to measure frequency modulation (FM) detection to determine whether FM detection task performance reflects individual differences in memory capacity.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>To test for a relationship between FM thresholds and memory capacity, young adults with normal hearing (N = 31, ages 19 - 40 years) completed FM detection tasks using two different designs (three alternative forced choice and Yes/No) and memory tasks (auditory digit span and visual free recall).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Psychometric functions differed across the two FM detection task designs and individual differences in performance were reliable, but no significant correlations were found between memory capacity and FM thresholds.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In young adults with normal hearing encoding of temporal fine structure and memory capacity are distinct constructs. Thus, previously observed associations between psychophysical and cognitive measures may reflect the shared effects of age- or hearing-related declines.</p>","PeriodicalId":72332,"journal":{"name":"Auditory perception & cognition","volume":"8 2","pages":"113-131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12396839/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Auditory perception & cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25742442.2025.2489912","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Psychophysical measures of auditory sensitivity are often used to explain speech recognition outcomes. However, interpretation of performance on these tasks assumes that they are insensitive to other factors, such as cognitive ability. Recent studies have cast doubt on this assumption by observing relationships between cognition and performance on psychoacoustic tasks. Here, we examined the relationship between memory tasks and two tasks designed to measure frequency modulation (FM) detection to determine whether FM detection task performance reflects individual differences in memory capacity.

Method: To test for a relationship between FM thresholds and memory capacity, young adults with normal hearing (N = 31, ages 19 - 40 years) completed FM detection tasks using two different designs (three alternative forced choice and Yes/No) and memory tasks (auditory digit span and visual free recall).

Results: Psychometric functions differed across the two FM detection task designs and individual differences in performance were reliable, but no significant correlations were found between memory capacity and FM thresholds.

Conclusions: In young adults with normal hearing encoding of temporal fine structure and memory capacity are distinct constructs. Thus, previously observed associations between psychophysical and cognitive measures may reflect the shared effects of age- or hearing-related declines.

调频检测阈值与言语记忆容量的个体差异无关。
目的:听觉敏感性的心理物理测量常被用来解释语音识别的结果。然而,对这些任务的表现的解释假设他们对其他因素不敏感,比如认知能力。最近的研究通过观察认知和心理声学任务表现之间的关系,对这一假设提出了质疑。在这里,我们研究了记忆任务和两个调频检测任务之间的关系,以确定调频检测任务的表现是否反映了个体记忆容量的差异。方法:为了检验调频阈值与记忆容量的关系,听力正常的年轻成年人(N = 31,年龄19 - 40岁)使用两种不同的设计(三种强迫选择和是/否)完成调频检测任务和记忆任务(听觉数字广度和视觉自由回忆)。结果:两种调频检测任务设计的心理测量功能存在差异,个体表现差异是可靠的,但记忆容量与调频阈值之间没有显著相关性。结论:在听力正常的青壮年中,颞精细结构编码和记忆容量编码是不同的结构。因此,先前观察到的心理物理和认知测量之间的关联可能反映了与年龄或听力相关的衰退的共同影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信