Correct sepsis classification-A must for antimicrobial stewardship: A longitudinal observational study.

Jaideep Pilania, Prasan Kumar Panda, Udit Chauhan, Ravi Kant
{"title":"Correct sepsis classification-A must for antimicrobial stewardship: A longitudinal observational study.","authors":"Jaideep Pilania, Prasan Kumar Panda, Udit Chauhan, Ravi Kant","doi":"10.5492/wjccm.v14.i3.101864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis is a critical medical condition, and poses a substantial global health burden, with significant morbidity, mortality, and economic costs, particularly pronounced in low- and middle-income countries. Effective management of sepsis relies on early recognition and appropriate intervention, underscoring the importance of accurate classification to guide treatment decisions. The correct diagnosis will lead to effective antimicrobial stewardship practices.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the distribution of sepsis categories and the use of empirical antibiotics classified by the World Health Organization (WHO) Access, Watch, and Reserve (AWaRe) system in a tertiary care hospital in Northern India and to correlate antibiotic usage with sepsis classifications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This longitudinal observational study in the Department of General Medicine, in a tertiary care hospital in Northern India, from 2023 to 2024, aimed to assess the use of empirical antibiotics classified by the WHO AWaRe system. The study also aimed to correlate antibiotic usage. Patients were categorized into sepsis classes (Asepsis, Possible Sepsis, Probable Sepsis, Confirmed Sepsis) and followed until discharge or Day-28. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were employed to assess sepsis categories and empirical antibiotic usage classified by the WHO AWaRe system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1867 patients admitted with suspected sepsis were screened, with 230 meeting the inclusion criteria. Among the study cohort (mean age 40.70 ± 14.49 years, 50.9% female), initial sepsis classification predominantly included probable sepsis (51.3%) and possible sepsis (35.7%), evolving to asepsis (57.8%) upon final classification, but all received antibiotics. Empirical antibiotic use showed a predominance of Watch group antibiotics (72.2%), with ceftriaxone and piperacillin-tazobactam being the most commonly prescribed; however, no statistical association could be established among the different classes of sepsis with the AWaRe groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Accurate sepsis classification is pivotal for clinical decision-making, optimizing antibiotic use, and combating antimicrobial resistance. The majority of the asepsis category was labelled as probable or possible sepsis and given antibiotics at initial hospitalization. The high reliance on Watch group antibiotics in empirical therapy signals a need for enhanced diagnostic strategies to refine treatment initiation, potentially reducing unnecessary antibiotic exposure. Future efforts should focus on establishing sepsis classification checklists as in this study and promoting adherence to antimicrobial stewardship principles to mitigate the global threat of antimicrobial resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":66959,"journal":{"name":"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)","volume":"14 3","pages":"101864"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12304903/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v14.i3.101864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sepsis is a critical medical condition, and poses a substantial global health burden, with significant morbidity, mortality, and economic costs, particularly pronounced in low- and middle-income countries. Effective management of sepsis relies on early recognition and appropriate intervention, underscoring the importance of accurate classification to guide treatment decisions. The correct diagnosis will lead to effective antimicrobial stewardship practices.

Aim: To assess the distribution of sepsis categories and the use of empirical antibiotics classified by the World Health Organization (WHO) Access, Watch, and Reserve (AWaRe) system in a tertiary care hospital in Northern India and to correlate antibiotic usage with sepsis classifications.

Methods: This longitudinal observational study in the Department of General Medicine, in a tertiary care hospital in Northern India, from 2023 to 2024, aimed to assess the use of empirical antibiotics classified by the WHO AWaRe system. The study also aimed to correlate antibiotic usage. Patients were categorized into sepsis classes (Asepsis, Possible Sepsis, Probable Sepsis, Confirmed Sepsis) and followed until discharge or Day-28. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were employed to assess sepsis categories and empirical antibiotic usage classified by the WHO AWaRe system.

Results: A total of 1867 patients admitted with suspected sepsis were screened, with 230 meeting the inclusion criteria. Among the study cohort (mean age 40.70 ± 14.49 years, 50.9% female), initial sepsis classification predominantly included probable sepsis (51.3%) and possible sepsis (35.7%), evolving to asepsis (57.8%) upon final classification, but all received antibiotics. Empirical antibiotic use showed a predominance of Watch group antibiotics (72.2%), with ceftriaxone and piperacillin-tazobactam being the most commonly prescribed; however, no statistical association could be established among the different classes of sepsis with the AWaRe groups.

Conclusion: Accurate sepsis classification is pivotal for clinical decision-making, optimizing antibiotic use, and combating antimicrobial resistance. The majority of the asepsis category was labelled as probable or possible sepsis and given antibiotics at initial hospitalization. The high reliance on Watch group antibiotics in empirical therapy signals a need for enhanced diagnostic strategies to refine treatment initiation, potentially reducing unnecessary antibiotic exposure. Future efforts should focus on establishing sepsis classification checklists as in this study and promoting adherence to antimicrobial stewardship principles to mitigate the global threat of antimicrobial resistance.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

正确的败血症分类-抗菌药物管理的必须:一项纵向观察研究。
背景:脓毒症是一种严重的疾病,造成了巨大的全球健康负担,具有显著的发病率、死亡率和经济成本,在低收入和中等收入国家尤其明显。脓毒症的有效管理依赖于早期识别和适当的干预,这强调了准确分类对指导治疗决策的重要性。正确的诊断将导致有效的抗菌药物管理实践。目的:评估世界卫生组织(WHO)准入、观察和储备(AWaRe)系统在印度北部三级医院分类的败血症类别分布和经验抗生素的使用情况,并将抗生素使用与败血症分类联系起来。方法:这项纵向观察研究于2023年至2024年在印度北部一家三级医院的普通内科进行,旨在评估世卫组织AWaRe系统分类的经验性抗生素的使用情况。该研究还旨在找出抗生素使用的相关性。将患者分为脓毒症类别(无菌、可能脓毒症、可能脓毒症、确诊脓毒症),随访至出院或第28天。采用描述性和推断性统计分析来评估世卫组织AWaRe系统分类的败血症类别和经验性抗生素使用情况。结果:共筛查了1867例疑似脓毒症患者,其中230例符合纳入标准。在研究队列中(平均年龄40.70±14.49岁,50.9%为女性),初始脓毒症分类主要包括可能脓毒症(51.3%)和可能脓毒症(35.7%),最终分类为无菌(57.8%),但均接受抗生素治疗。经验抗生素使用显示Watch组抗生素占优势(72.2%),其中头孢曲松和哌拉西林-他唑巴坦是最常用的处方;然而,不同类型的脓毒症与AWaRe组之间没有统计学关联。结论:准确的脓毒症分类对临床决策、优化抗生素使用、对抗耐药性具有重要意义。大多数无菌类别被标记为可能或可能的败血症,并在首次住院时给予抗生素。在经验性治疗中对Watch组抗生素的高度依赖表明需要加强诊断策略,以改进治疗开始,潜在地减少不必要的抗生素暴露。未来的努力应集中在建立脓毒症分类清单,如本研究和促进遵守抗微生物药物管理原则,以减轻抗微生物药物耐药性的全球威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
216
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信