Outreach simulation for system improvement: a novel advocacy and reporting process.

IF 4.7 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
A St-Onge-St-Hilaire, B Lawton, L Dodson, J Acworth, D Hufton, B Symon
{"title":"Outreach simulation for system improvement: a novel advocacy and reporting process.","authors":"A St-Onge-St-Hilaire, B Lawton, L Dodson, J Acworth, D Hufton, B Symon","doi":"10.1186/s41077-025-00372-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Healthcare simulation programmes measuring their value risk wasting resources in attempts to prove they impact patient outcomes. Simulation is one of many strategies used to enhance healthcare systems, and proving specific correlation with simulation will prove impossible in many circumstances. To maintain accountability but ensure feasibility, we argue simulation services need measurement processes that are robust, achievable, and synergistic with their mission. In 2023, the STORK service in Queensland, Australia, began measuring the impact of simulation on systems rather than patients to define the extent to which their educational programmes could impact system improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Translational simulation methodologies and quality improvement measures were embedded in an established educational course. We used simulation activities to diagnose environmental and system-level problems in participants' workplaces throughout Queensland. Courses included dedicated time to discuss site-specific actionable solutions with participants and identified local champions to implement quality improvement changes. By designing a novel electronic reporting process (Optimus PRIME Course Summary), we documented issues and solutions identified in regional healthcare facilities and ensured they reached key stakeholders. We audited our ability to improve these systems through follow-up data collection via phone and emails with local educators across the state.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 40 courses delivered across 37 facilities, 242 issues were identified, primarily related to drug safety and equipment management. At follow-up, 45.5% of the issues were resolved, with 44.6% still being addressed. Recommended resources were successfully implemented in 64% of sites.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This process demonstrates that focusing on system-level changes can significantly enhance healthcare systems. The reporting framework provided a robust, achievable, and synergistic method to measure simulation impact and influence change. Additionally, we share key lessons learned from the process to guide other simulation services in improving their own measurement strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":72108,"journal":{"name":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","volume":"10 1","pages":"44"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12403477/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-025-00372-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Healthcare simulation programmes measuring their value risk wasting resources in attempts to prove they impact patient outcomes. Simulation is one of many strategies used to enhance healthcare systems, and proving specific correlation with simulation will prove impossible in many circumstances. To maintain accountability but ensure feasibility, we argue simulation services need measurement processes that are robust, achievable, and synergistic with their mission. In 2023, the STORK service in Queensland, Australia, began measuring the impact of simulation on systems rather than patients to define the extent to which their educational programmes could impact system improvement.

Methods: Translational simulation methodologies and quality improvement measures were embedded in an established educational course. We used simulation activities to diagnose environmental and system-level problems in participants' workplaces throughout Queensland. Courses included dedicated time to discuss site-specific actionable solutions with participants and identified local champions to implement quality improvement changes. By designing a novel electronic reporting process (Optimus PRIME Course Summary), we documented issues and solutions identified in regional healthcare facilities and ensured they reached key stakeholders. We audited our ability to improve these systems through follow-up data collection via phone and emails with local educators across the state.

Results: From 40 courses delivered across 37 facilities, 242 issues were identified, primarily related to drug safety and equipment management. At follow-up, 45.5% of the issues were resolved, with 44.6% still being addressed. Recommended resources were successfully implemented in 64% of sites.

Conclusion: This process demonstrates that focusing on system-level changes can significantly enhance healthcare systems. The reporting framework provided a robust, achievable, and synergistic method to measure simulation impact and influence change. Additionally, we share key lessons learned from the process to guide other simulation services in improving their own measurement strategies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

系统改进的外展模拟:一种新颖的倡导和报告过程。
简介:医疗保健模拟程序衡量其价值的风险浪费资源,试图证明他们影响患者的结果。模拟是用于增强医疗保健系统的众多策略之一,在许多情况下,证明与模拟的特定相关性是不可能的。为了维持问责制,同时确保可行性,我们认为模拟服务需要健壮的、可实现的、与其使命协同的度量过程。2023年,澳大利亚昆士兰州的STORK服务开始衡量模拟对系统的影响,而不是患者,以确定他们的教育计划对系统改进的影响程度。方法:将翻译模拟方法和质量改进措施融入已建立的教学课程中。我们使用模拟活动来诊断整个昆士兰参与者工作场所的环境和系统级问题。课程包括专门的时间与参与者讨论具体地点的可行解决方案,并确定当地的冠军来实施质量改进变革。通过设计一个新颖的电子报告流程(Optimus PRIME Course Summary),我们记录了在区域医疗保健机构中发现的问题和解决方案,并确保它们传达给关键利益相关者。我们通过电话和电子邮件与全州各地的当地教育工作者进行后续数据收集,审核了我们改进这些系统的能力。结果:在37家机构开设的40门课程中,发现了242个问题,主要与药品安全和设备管理有关。在随访中,45.5%的问题得到解决,44.6%的问题仍在处理中。推荐的资源在64%的站点成功实施。结论:这一过程表明,关注系统层面的变化可以显著提高医疗保健系统。报告框架提供了一种可靠的、可实现的和协同的方法来衡量模拟影响和影响变化。此外,我们还分享了从该过程中吸取的关键经验教训,以指导其他模拟服务改进自己的度量策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信