Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System: Overcoming Barriers to Global Implementation-AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Ailin Dehghanpour, Matthew S Davenport, Valdair F Muglia, Refky Nicola, Luyao Shen, Atul B Shinagare, Hebert A Vargas, Valeria Panebianco
{"title":"Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System: Overcoming Barriers to Global Implementation-<i>AJR</i> Expert Panel Narrative Review.","authors":"Ailin Dehghanpour, Matthew S Davenport, Valdair F Muglia, Refky Nicola, Luyao Shen, Atul B Shinagare, Hebert A Vargas, Valeria Panebianco","doi":"10.2214/AJR.25.33634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since its introduction in 2018, the Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) has emerged as a standardized and reproducible framework for multiparametric MRI assessment of bladder cancer, with validated diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing muscle-invasive from non-muscle-invasive disease. Despite growing international interest, expert consensus, and the system's inclusion in most major guidelines, real-world clinical adoption of VI-RADS remains limited. This AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review explores the key barriers that hinder the implementation of VI-RADS into everyday workflows across diverse healthcare settings, including skepticism among referring clinicians, an inability (unlike cystoscopy-based staging) to perform simultaneous tumor resection, suboptimal posttreatment performance, and variability in image quality and reader experience. Additional logistical and economic factors, including restricted access outside of specialized centers and limited cost-effectiveness data, further impair widespread uptake. The article outlines strategic recommendations to address these challenges, including standardizing bladder MRI quality, incorporating structured educational initiatives, refining VI-RADS protocols for posttreatment settings, and fostering multidisciplinary collaboration. VI-RADS has the potential to become a cornerstone of bladder cancer management, but the validation and implementation of a bladder-MRI pathway will depend on continued refinement, acceptance, and alignment across clinical, technical, and guideline domains.</p>","PeriodicalId":55529,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Roentgenology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Roentgenology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.25.33634","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since its introduction in 2018, the Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) has emerged as a standardized and reproducible framework for multiparametric MRI assessment of bladder cancer, with validated diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing muscle-invasive from non-muscle-invasive disease. Despite growing international interest, expert consensus, and the system's inclusion in most major guidelines, real-world clinical adoption of VI-RADS remains limited. This AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review explores the key barriers that hinder the implementation of VI-RADS into everyday workflows across diverse healthcare settings, including skepticism among referring clinicians, an inability (unlike cystoscopy-based staging) to perform simultaneous tumor resection, suboptimal posttreatment performance, and variability in image quality and reader experience. Additional logistical and economic factors, including restricted access outside of specialized centers and limited cost-effectiveness data, further impair widespread uptake. The article outlines strategic recommendations to address these challenges, including standardizing bladder MRI quality, incorporating structured educational initiatives, refining VI-RADS protocols for posttreatment settings, and fostering multidisciplinary collaboration. VI-RADS has the potential to become a cornerstone of bladder cancer management, but the validation and implementation of a bladder-MRI pathway will depend on continued refinement, acceptance, and alignment across clinical, technical, and guideline domains.

膀胱成像报告和数据系统:克服全球实施的障碍- ajr专家小组叙述审查。
自2018年推出以来,膀胱成像报告和数据系统(VI-RADS)已成为膀胱癌多参数MRI评估的标准化和可重复的框架,在区分肌肉侵袭性和非肌肉侵袭性疾病方面具有经过验证的诊断准确性。尽管国际上对VI-RADS越来越感兴趣,专家达成共识,并且该系统被纳入大多数主要指南,但实际临床中对VI-RADS的采用仍然有限。这篇AJR专家小组叙述性评论探讨了阻碍VI-RADS在不同医疗保健环境中日常工作流程中实施的主要障碍,包括转诊临床医生的怀疑,无法(与基于膀胱镜的分期不同)同时进行肿瘤切除,治疗后表现不佳,以及图像质量和读者体验的可变性。额外的后勤和经济因素,包括专业中心以外的准入限制和有限的成本效益数据,进一步阻碍了广泛采用。本文概述了应对这些挑战的战略建议,包括标准化膀胱MRI质量,纳入结构化教育计划,改进治疗后设置的VI-RADS协议,以及促进多学科合作。VI-RADS有可能成为膀胱癌治疗的基石,但膀胱- mri通路的验证和实施将取决于临床、技术和指南领域的不断完善、接受和协调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
920
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1907, the monthly American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR) is the world’s longest continuously published general radiology journal. AJR is recognized as among the specialty’s leading peer-reviewed journals and has a worldwide circulation of close to 25,000. The journal publishes clinically-oriented articles across all radiology subspecialties, seeking relevance to radiologists’ daily practice. The journal publishes hundreds of articles annually with a diverse range of formats, including original research, reviews, clinical perspectives, editorials, and other short reports. The journal engages its audience through a spectrum of social media and digital communication activities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信