Mandibular positioning using patient-specific guides and osteosynthesis implants in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with maxilla-first approach. A 3D-analysis.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Mario Scheurer, Johannes Schulze, Thomas Lins, Tobias Daut, Robin Kasper, Frank Wilde, Alexander Schramm, Marcel Ebeling, Andreas Sakkas
{"title":"Mandibular positioning using patient-specific guides and osteosynthesis implants in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with maxilla-first approach. A 3D-analysis.","authors":"Mario Scheurer, Johannes Schulze, Thomas Lins, Tobias Daut, Robin Kasper, Frank Wilde, Alexander Schramm, Marcel Ebeling, Andreas Sakkas","doi":"10.1016/j.jcms.2025.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a fully 3D planned digital workflow for bimaxillary osteotomies, utilizing patient-specific osteotomy and drill guides (PSDOG) and osteosynthesis implants (PSOI), within a maxilla-first approach. Emphasis was placed on the accuracy of guided mandibular positioning. This retrospective study included 30 patients undergoing bimaxillary orthognathic surgery [bimaxillary PSDOG/PSOI (Group 1; n = 11) versus maxillary PSDOG/PSOI (Group 2; n = 19)]. 3D CT datasets were used for accuracy assessment. Primary outcome parameter was the accuracy of the intraoperative mandibular transfer evaluated on cephalometric landmarks. Secondary outcome parameter was the 3D accuracy of mandibular positioning. Cephalometric analysis revealed significant vertical undercorrections and lateral deviations in the positioning of proximal mandibular segments (adj. p < 0.05). 3D analysis revealed a trend towards lower maximal deviations at the left ascending ramus in Group 1 (p = 0.058). Moderate positional accuracy was observed, with the largest vector deviations occurring in the latero-inferior-anterior direction. Iatrogenic injuries and bad splits were lower in Group 1 (p ≥ 0.52). Duration of surgery did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.21). Fully guided and patient-specific orthognathic procedures enable precise and reproducible mandibular repositioning and may contribute to a reduction in intraoperative complication rates. However, control of the proximal segments, particularly condylar positioning, remains limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":54851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2025.08.002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a fully 3D planned digital workflow for bimaxillary osteotomies, utilizing patient-specific osteotomy and drill guides (PSDOG) and osteosynthesis implants (PSOI), within a maxilla-first approach. Emphasis was placed on the accuracy of guided mandibular positioning. This retrospective study included 30 patients undergoing bimaxillary orthognathic surgery [bimaxillary PSDOG/PSOI (Group 1; n = 11) versus maxillary PSDOG/PSOI (Group 2; n = 19)]. 3D CT datasets were used for accuracy assessment. Primary outcome parameter was the accuracy of the intraoperative mandibular transfer evaluated on cephalometric landmarks. Secondary outcome parameter was the 3D accuracy of mandibular positioning. Cephalometric analysis revealed significant vertical undercorrections and lateral deviations in the positioning of proximal mandibular segments (adj. p < 0.05). 3D analysis revealed a trend towards lower maximal deviations at the left ascending ramus in Group 1 (p = 0.058). Moderate positional accuracy was observed, with the largest vector deviations occurring in the latero-inferior-anterior direction. Iatrogenic injuries and bad splits were lower in Group 1 (p ≥ 0.52). Duration of surgery did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.21). Fully guided and patient-specific orthognathic procedures enable precise and reproducible mandibular repositioning and may contribute to a reduction in intraoperative complication rates. However, control of the proximal segments, particularly condylar positioning, remains limited.

在上颌先入路的双颌正颌手术中,使用患者特异性导向器和骨合成种植体进行下颌定位。3 d-analysis。
本研究的目的是评估在上颌优先入路中,利用患者特异性截骨和钻孔导轨(PSDOG)和骨合成植入物(PSOI)进行双颌截骨术的全3D计划数字工作流程的准确性。重点放在引导下颌骨定位的准确性。本回顾性研究包括30例接受双颌正颌手术的患者[双颌PSDOG/PSOI(组1,n = 11)与上颌PSDOG/PSOI(组2,n = 19)]。使用三维CT数据集进行准确性评估。主要结局参数是术中下颌转移的准确性评估的头测量标志。次要结局参数为下颌定位的三维精度。头颅测量分析显示,下颌近段定位有明显的垂直矫正不足和侧向偏差
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
22.60%
发文量
117
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery publishes articles covering all aspects of surgery of the head, face and jaw. Specific topics covered recently have included: • Distraction osteogenesis • Synthetic bone substitutes • Fibroblast growth factors • Fetal wound healing • Skull base surgery • Computer-assisted surgery • Vascularized bone grafts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信