Implementation of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in stage III melanoma: a modified Delphi consensus study in a European-accredited cancer center in Ireland.
Christopher Cronin, Fiachra Martin, James D Martin-Smith, Nadeem Ajmal, Paul Sullivan, Aileen O'Shea, Muireann Roche, Christian Gulmann, Nazmy Elbeltagi, Barry O'Sullivan, Patrick G Morris, Oscar S Breathnach, Liam M Grogan, Bryan T Hennessy, Adrian Murphy, Megan Greally, Jarushka Naidoo
{"title":"Implementation of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in stage III melanoma: a modified Delphi consensus study in a European-accredited cancer center in Ireland.","authors":"Christopher Cronin, Fiachra Martin, James D Martin-Smith, Nadeem Ajmal, Paul Sullivan, Aileen O'Shea, Muireann Roche, Christian Gulmann, Nazmy Elbeltagi, Barry O'Sullivan, Patrick G Morris, Oscar S Breathnach, Liam M Grogan, Bryan T Hennessy, Adrian Murphy, Megan Greally, Jarushka Naidoo","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The landscape of perioperative immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for stage III melanoma is rapidly evolving. We conducted a modified Delphi consensus process to the define at an institutional level the optimal approach to implementation of a neoadjuvant ICI pathway for melanoma, addressing the themes of patient selection, perioperative therapy, response assessment and operative considerations, and follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed 28 consensus statements which were circulated to 24 senior members of an institutional melanoma multidisciplinary meeting (MDM) team at the OECI-accredited Beaumont RCSI Cancer Centre, Ireland. Members were invited to anonymously rate statements using a 5-point Likert score. Statements not reaching pre-determined consensus threshold from the initial round of Delphi process would be amended for subsequent rounds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two modified Delphi rounds were conducted between May and June 2024, with round 1 results presented locally and at national meeting. Response rates for rounds 1 and 2 were 60% and 46%, respectively. In total, 23 statements of the 28 included (82%) met pre-determined criteria for consensus. Areas where lack of consensus was identified included the use of ICIs to down-stage unresectable disease, response-adapted approaches to adjuvant therapy and the optimal extent of nodal resection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and revelance: </strong>Our process identified important knowledge gaps regarding the multidisciplinary care of stage III melanoma. The statements generated will be used to develop a local pathway for the implementation of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in melanoma, with plans to further expand the Delphi process to other Irish institutions incorporating up to date published data to refine recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12448481/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf265","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The landscape of perioperative immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for stage III melanoma is rapidly evolving. We conducted a modified Delphi consensus process to the define at an institutional level the optimal approach to implementation of a neoadjuvant ICI pathway for melanoma, addressing the themes of patient selection, perioperative therapy, response assessment and operative considerations, and follow-up.
Methods: We developed 28 consensus statements which were circulated to 24 senior members of an institutional melanoma multidisciplinary meeting (MDM) team at the OECI-accredited Beaumont RCSI Cancer Centre, Ireland. Members were invited to anonymously rate statements using a 5-point Likert score. Statements not reaching pre-determined consensus threshold from the initial round of Delphi process would be amended for subsequent rounds.
Results: Two modified Delphi rounds were conducted between May and June 2024, with round 1 results presented locally and at national meeting. Response rates for rounds 1 and 2 were 60% and 46%, respectively. In total, 23 statements of the 28 included (82%) met pre-determined criteria for consensus. Areas where lack of consensus was identified included the use of ICIs to down-stage unresectable disease, response-adapted approaches to adjuvant therapy and the optimal extent of nodal resection.
Conclusions and revelance: Our process identified important knowledge gaps regarding the multidisciplinary care of stage III melanoma. The statements generated will be used to develop a local pathway for the implementation of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in melanoma, with plans to further expand the Delphi process to other Irish institutions incorporating up to date published data to refine recommendations.
期刊介绍:
The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.