Implementation of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in stage III melanoma: a modified Delphi consensus study in a European-accredited cancer center in Ireland.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Oncologist Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1093/oncolo/oyaf265
Christopher Cronin, Fiachra Martin, James D Martin-Smith, Nadeem Ajmal, Paul Sullivan, Aileen O'Shea, Muireann Roche, Christian Gulmann, Nazmy Elbeltagi, Barry O'Sullivan, Patrick G Morris, Oscar S Breathnach, Liam M Grogan, Bryan T Hennessy, Adrian Murphy, Megan Greally, Jarushka Naidoo
{"title":"Implementation of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in stage III melanoma: a modified Delphi consensus study in a European-accredited cancer center in Ireland.","authors":"Christopher Cronin, Fiachra Martin, James D Martin-Smith, Nadeem Ajmal, Paul Sullivan, Aileen O'Shea, Muireann Roche, Christian Gulmann, Nazmy Elbeltagi, Barry O'Sullivan, Patrick G Morris, Oscar S Breathnach, Liam M Grogan, Bryan T Hennessy, Adrian Murphy, Megan Greally, Jarushka Naidoo","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The landscape of perioperative immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for stage III melanoma is rapidly evolving. We conducted a modified Delphi consensus process to the define at an institutional level the optimal approach to implementation of a neoadjuvant ICI pathway for melanoma, addressing the themes of patient selection, perioperative therapy, response assessment and operative considerations, and follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed 28 consensus statements which were circulated to 24 senior members of an institutional melanoma multidisciplinary meeting (MDM) team at the OECI-accredited Beaumont RCSI Cancer Centre, Ireland. Members were invited to anonymously rate statements using a 5-point Likert score. Statements not reaching pre-determined consensus threshold from the initial round of Delphi process would be amended for subsequent rounds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two modified Delphi rounds were conducted between May and June 2024, with round 1 results presented locally and at national meeting. Response rates for rounds 1 and 2 were 60% and 46%, respectively. In total, 23 statements of the 28 included (82%) met pre-determined criteria for consensus. Areas where lack of consensus was identified included the use of ICIs to down-stage unresectable disease, response-adapted approaches to adjuvant therapy and the optimal extent of nodal resection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and revelance: </strong>Our process identified important knowledge gaps regarding the multidisciplinary care of stage III melanoma. The statements generated will be used to develop a local pathway for the implementation of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in melanoma, with plans to further expand the Delphi process to other Irish institutions incorporating up to date published data to refine recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12448481/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf265","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The landscape of perioperative immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for stage III melanoma is rapidly evolving. We conducted a modified Delphi consensus process to the define at an institutional level the optimal approach to implementation of a neoadjuvant ICI pathway for melanoma, addressing the themes of patient selection, perioperative therapy, response assessment and operative considerations, and follow-up.

Methods: We developed 28 consensus statements which were circulated to 24 senior members of an institutional melanoma multidisciplinary meeting (MDM) team at the OECI-accredited Beaumont RCSI Cancer Centre, Ireland. Members were invited to anonymously rate statements using a 5-point Likert score. Statements not reaching pre-determined consensus threshold from the initial round of Delphi process would be amended for subsequent rounds.

Results: Two modified Delphi rounds were conducted between May and June 2024, with round 1 results presented locally and at national meeting. Response rates for rounds 1 and 2 were 60% and 46%, respectively. In total, 23 statements of the 28 included (82%) met pre-determined criteria for consensus. Areas where lack of consensus was identified included the use of ICIs to down-stage unresectable disease, response-adapted approaches to adjuvant therapy and the optimal extent of nodal resection.

Conclusions and revelance: Our process identified important knowledge gaps regarding the multidisciplinary care of stage III melanoma. The statements generated will be used to develop a local pathway for the implementation of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in melanoma, with plans to further expand the Delphi process to other Irish institutions incorporating up to date published data to refine recommendations.

新辅助免疫治疗在III期黑色素瘤中的实施:在爱尔兰欧洲认可的癌症中心进行的一项改进的德尔菲共识研究。
背景:III期黑色素瘤围手术期免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗的前景正在迅速发展。我们进行了一个改进的德尔福共识过程,以确定在机构层面实施黑色素瘤新辅助ICI途径的最佳方法,解决患者选择、围手术期治疗、反应评估和手术考虑以及随访等主题。方法:我们制定了28项共识声明,分发给oeci认可的爱尔兰Beaumont RCSI癌症中心机构黑色素瘤多学科会议(MDM)团队的24名高级成员。成员们被邀请用5分的李克特评分对陈述进行匿名评分。在第一轮德尔菲过程中未达到预先确定的共识门槛的陈述将在随后的几轮中进行修订。结果:在2024年5月至6月进行了两轮修正德尔菲,第一轮结果在地方和全国会议上公布。第一轮和第二轮的反应率分别为60%和46%。总共包括28个声明中的23个(82%)符合预先确定的共识标准。确定缺乏共识的领域包括使用ICIs来降低不可切除疾病的分期,适应反应的辅助治疗方法和淋巴结切除的最佳范围。结论:我们的研究过程确定了关于III期黑色素瘤多学科治疗的重要知识缺口。所产生的结论将用于开发实施黑色素瘤新辅助免疫治疗的本地途径,并计划进一步将德尔福过程扩展到其他爱尔兰机构,并结合最新公布的数据来完善建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oncologist
Oncologist 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
309
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信