Work related well-being in the UK physiotherapy workforce: Part 2. Documentary analyses of the qualitative data from the YOURvieWS cross-sectional e-survey.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
C J Minns Lowe, M Donovan, A Herbland, A Moulson
{"title":"Work related well-being in the UK physiotherapy workforce: Part 2. Documentary analyses of the qualitative data from the YOURvieWS cross-sectional e-survey.","authors":"C J Minns Lowe, M Donovan, A Herbland, A Moulson","doi":"10.1016/j.physio.2025.101805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore and understand the replies to the quantitative findings (Part 1) from the work related well-being e-survey, provide greater depth information about the topic and identify new issues/areas from respondents in Part 2 of this two part paper.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional, convenience, voluntary, open e-survey.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Online.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>UK physiotherapy workforce, including physiotherapists, students, support workers across all workplace settings and across the UK.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following development, pre-testing and ethics approval, the e-survey was widely advertised and ran from 08/03/2023 to 30/04/2023 via Bristol Online Survey. The open comments question in the e-survey was: 'We are keen to hear your views, please type up to three key factors that you think impact most upon work-related well-being within physiotherapy'.</p><p><strong>Analyses: </strong>Open comments analyses using content analysis to interpret meaning from the content of text data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>612 respondents provided 1649 overall comments to. One overarching theme and three subthemes incorporating seventeen factors were developed from 138 initial codes. The overarching theme was moral distress and moral injury reducing work related well-being (WRWB) within the physiotherapy workforce. Subthemes were 1. Impact on me. 2. 'You aren't able to do your job properly'. 3. Management and support. Subthemes and factors fitted within the overarching theme.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Moral distress and injury explained the quantitative findings (Part 1) regarding poor work-related well-being, burnout and stress within the physiotherapy workforce. Moral injury is the consequence of organisational processes and broken health care systems, strategies to improve WRWB across all UK physiotherapy settings are urgently required. CONTRIBUTION OF THE PAPER.</p>","PeriodicalId":54608,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"101805"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2025.101805","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To explore and understand the replies to the quantitative findings (Part 1) from the work related well-being e-survey, provide greater depth information about the topic and identify new issues/areas from respondents in Part 2 of this two part paper.

Design: Cross-sectional, convenience, voluntary, open e-survey.

Setting: Online.

Participants: UK physiotherapy workforce, including physiotherapists, students, support workers across all workplace settings and across the UK.

Methods: Following development, pre-testing and ethics approval, the e-survey was widely advertised and ran from 08/03/2023 to 30/04/2023 via Bristol Online Survey. The open comments question in the e-survey was: 'We are keen to hear your views, please type up to three key factors that you think impact most upon work-related well-being within physiotherapy'.

Analyses: Open comments analyses using content analysis to interpret meaning from the content of text data.

Results: 612 respondents provided 1649 overall comments to. One overarching theme and three subthemes incorporating seventeen factors were developed from 138 initial codes. The overarching theme was moral distress and moral injury reducing work related well-being (WRWB) within the physiotherapy workforce. Subthemes were 1. Impact on me. 2. 'You aren't able to do your job properly'. 3. Management and support. Subthemes and factors fitted within the overarching theme.

Conclusions: Moral distress and injury explained the quantitative findings (Part 1) regarding poor work-related well-being, burnout and stress within the physiotherapy workforce. Moral injury is the consequence of organisational processes and broken health care systems, strategies to improve WRWB across all UK physiotherapy settings are urgently required. CONTRIBUTION OF THE PAPER.

工作相关的福祉在英国物理治疗劳动力:第2部分。对来自YOURvieWS横断面电子调查的定性数据进行文献分析。
目的:探索和理解对与工作相关的幸福感电子调查的定量结果(第1部分)的回复,在这篇由两部分组成的论文的第2部分中,提供关于主题的更深入的信息,并从受访者那里确定新的问题/领域。设计:横断面、方便、自愿、公开的电子调查。设置:在线。参与者:英国物理治疗人员,包括物理治疗师、学生、全英国所有工作场所的支持人员。方法:经过开发、预测试和伦理审批,电子调查通过布里斯托尔在线调查广泛宣传,并于2023年3月8日至2023年4月30日通过布里斯托尔在线调查进行。电子调查中的公开评论问题是:“我们很想听听你的意见,请输入你认为在物理治疗中对工作幸福感影响最大的三个关键因素。”分析:开放评论分析使用内容分析,从文本数据的内容中解释含义。结果:612名受访者提供了1649条总体评论。从138个初始准则发展出一个总主题和包含17个因素的三个次级主题。总体主题是道德困扰和道德伤害减少工作相关的福祉(WRWB)在物理治疗的劳动力。副主题是1。对我的影响。2. “你不能很好地完成你的工作。”3. 管理和支持。次要主题和因素与总体主题相匹配。结论:道德困扰和伤害解释了定量研究结果(第1部分)关于工作幸福感差,倦怠和压力的物理治疗工作队伍。道德伤害是组织过程和破碎的卫生保健系统的后果,迫切需要在所有英国物理治疗环境中改善WRWB的策略。论文贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiotherapy
Physiotherapy 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
377
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Physiotherapy aims to publish original research and facilitate continuing professional development for physiotherapists and other health professions worldwide. Dedicated to the advancement of physiotherapy through publication of research and scholarly work concerned with, but not limited to, its scientific basis and clinical application, education of practitioners, management of services and policy. We are pleased to receive articles reporting original scientific research, systematic reviews or meta-analyses, theoretical or debate articles, brief reports and technical reports. All papers should demonstrate methodological rigour.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信