Efficacy of individual and group problem-solving therapy in treating psychiatric patients who attempted suicide: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
M Neslihan Turgut, Mehmet Eskin
{"title":"Efficacy of individual and group problem-solving therapy in treating psychiatric patients who attempted suicide: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"M Neslihan Turgut, Mehmet Eskin","doi":"10.1080/13548506.2025.2546590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study tested the comparative efficacy of individual and group problem-solving therapy (PST) in psychiatric outpatients who have attempted suicide in a randomized controlled trial. The sample consisted of 39 Turkish adults admitted to psychiatric units due to a suicide attempt who were randomly assigned to an individual (indPST) and a group (grPST) and a waiting-list control condition (13 participants in each group). Participants responded first to sociodemographic questions; then they filled in a Suicide Probability Scale, a Beck Depression Inventory, a Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, a Revised Social Problem Solving Inventory-Short Form, and a Cognitive Flexibility Inventory before and after the intervention or waiting period. Participants enrolled in the two PST conditions filled in the measures three months after the end of the intervention for follow-up. We employed a repeated measures analysis of variance procedure to analyze the data and calculated the effect sizes using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences 20.0 (SPSS). The findings showed that the efficacy of the indPST and grPST was comparable. While the suicide probability and depression scale scores of participants in the two PST conditions decreased, their cognitive flexibility and social problem-solving scores increased significantly after the intervention. The changes correspond to large effect sizes. However, the scale scores of participants within the waiting list control condition were unchanged. The improvements gained within the PST conditions were maintained at three three-month follow-ups. We conclude that the individual and group PST may equally be efficacious for treating suicidal psychiatric patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":54535,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Health & Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Health & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2025.2546590","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study tested the comparative efficacy of individual and group problem-solving therapy (PST) in psychiatric outpatients who have attempted suicide in a randomized controlled trial. The sample consisted of 39 Turkish adults admitted to psychiatric units due to a suicide attempt who were randomly assigned to an individual (indPST) and a group (grPST) and a waiting-list control condition (13 participants in each group). Participants responded first to sociodemographic questions; then they filled in a Suicide Probability Scale, a Beck Depression Inventory, a Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, a Revised Social Problem Solving Inventory-Short Form, and a Cognitive Flexibility Inventory before and after the intervention or waiting period. Participants enrolled in the two PST conditions filled in the measures three months after the end of the intervention for follow-up. We employed a repeated measures analysis of variance procedure to analyze the data and calculated the effect sizes using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences 20.0 (SPSS). The findings showed that the efficacy of the indPST and grPST was comparable. While the suicide probability and depression scale scores of participants in the two PST conditions decreased, their cognitive flexibility and social problem-solving scores increased significantly after the intervention. The changes correspond to large effect sizes. However, the scale scores of participants within the waiting list control condition were unchanged. The improvements gained within the PST conditions were maintained at three three-month follow-ups. We conclude that the individual and group PST may equally be efficacious for treating suicidal psychiatric patients.

个体和群体问题解决疗法治疗企图自杀的精神病患者的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
本研究通过一项随机对照试验,检验了个体与群体问题解决疗法(PST)对精神科门诊自杀未遂患者的比较疗效。样本由39名因自杀未遂而被送入精神病院的土耳其成年人组成,他们被随机分配到个体(indPST)和群体(grPST)和等待名单控制条件(每组13名参与者)。参与者首先回答社会人口学问题;然后,他们在干预前后或等待期分别填写自杀概率量表、贝克抑郁量表、汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表、修正后的社会问题解决短量表和认知灵活性量表。参加两种PST条件的参与者在干预结束三个月后填写了测量表,以进行随访。我们采用重复测量方差分析程序对数据进行分析,并使用社会科学统计软件包20.0 (SPSS)计算效应量。结果表明,indPST和grPST的疗效相当。干预后,两种PST条件下的自杀概率和抑郁量表得分均下降,认知灵活性和社会问题解决得分显著提高。这些变化对应于较大的效应量。然而,在等候名单控制条件下,参与者的量表得分没有变化。在PST条件下取得的改善在三个月的后续行动中保持不变。我们的结论是,个体和群体PST可能对治疗自杀精神病人同样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychology Health & Medicine
Psychology Health & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychology, Health & Medicine is a multidisciplinary journal highlighting human factors in health. The journal provides a peer reviewed forum to report on issues of psychology and health in practice. This key publication reaches an international audience, highlighting the variation and similarities within different settings and exploring multiple health and illness issues from theoretical, practical and management perspectives. It provides a critical forum to examine the wide range of applied health and illness issues and how they incorporate psychological knowledge, understanding, theory and intervention. The journal reflects the growing recognition of psychosocial issues as they affect health planning, medical care, disease reaction, intervention, quality of life, adjustment adaptation and management. For many years theoretical research was very distant from applied understanding. The emerging movement in health psychology, changes in medical care provision and training, and consumer awareness of health issues all contribute to a growing need for applied research. This journal focuses on practical applications of theory, research and experience and provides a bridge between academic knowledge, illness experience, wellbeing and health care practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信