Sternal interferential current stimulation after sternotomy: A randomized, sham-controlled trial on pain and wound healing.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Nils Schulz, Gian Vo, Pascal Van Wijnen, Tim Wilhelmi, Michael Coch, Uwe Lange, Philipp Klemm
{"title":"Sternal interferential current stimulation after sternotomy: A randomized, sham-controlled trial on pain and wound healing.","authors":"Nils Schulz, Gian Vo, Pascal Van Wijnen, Tim Wilhelmi, Michael Coch, Uwe Lange, Philipp Klemm","doi":"10.2340/jrm.v57.43941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effect and safety of serial interferential current stimulation on postoperative pain and wound healing after sternotomy in cardiac rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Subjects/patients: </strong>200 patients undergoing open-heart surgery via sternotomy were enrolled during inpatient cardiac rehabilitation, 8 to 12 days postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were randomized into an intervention group receiving interferential current stimulation over the sternum (six sessions across 21 days) or a control group receiving sham stimulation. All participants underwent the same standardized cardiac rehabilitation program. The primary outcome was pain reduction over 21 days. Secondary outcomes included analgesic use, inflammatory cytokine levels, pulmonary function, wound healing, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interferential current stimulation significantly reduced pain scores compared to sham treatment. Analgesic use decreased more in the intervention group. A greater reduction in tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin 6 levels was observed. Pulmonary function and quality of life improved in both groups without significant between-group differences. No adverse effects or wound infections occurred in the intervention group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Serial interferential current stimulation is a safe, effective non-pharmacological therapy for reducing post-sternotomy pain and analgesic use in cardiac rehabilitation. The effect may be mediated by modulation of inflammatory cytokines.</p>","PeriodicalId":54768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":"57 ","pages":"jrm43941"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12379721/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v57.43941","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect and safety of serial interferential current stimulation on postoperative pain and wound healing after sternotomy in cardiac rehabilitation.

Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled clinical trial.

Subjects/patients: 200 patients undergoing open-heart surgery via sternotomy were enrolled during inpatient cardiac rehabilitation, 8 to 12 days postoperatively.

Methods: Patients were randomized into an intervention group receiving interferential current stimulation over the sternum (six sessions across 21 days) or a control group receiving sham stimulation. All participants underwent the same standardized cardiac rehabilitation program. The primary outcome was pain reduction over 21 days. Secondary outcomes included analgesic use, inflammatory cytokine levels, pulmonary function, wound healing, and adverse events.

Results: Interferential current stimulation significantly reduced pain scores compared to sham treatment. Analgesic use decreased more in the intervention group. A greater reduction in tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin 6 levels was observed. Pulmonary function and quality of life improved in both groups without significant between-group differences. No adverse effects or wound infections occurred in the intervention group.

Conclusion: Serial interferential current stimulation is a safe, effective non-pharmacological therapy for reducing post-sternotomy pain and analgesic use in cardiac rehabilitation. The effect may be mediated by modulation of inflammatory cytokines.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

胸骨切开后的胸骨干扰电流刺激:一项关于疼痛和伤口愈合的随机、假对照试验。
目的:评价连续干扰电流刺激对心脏康复胸骨切开术后疼痛和伤口愈合的影响及安全性。设计:前瞻性、随机、双盲、假对照临床试验。受试者/患者:200例经胸骨切开心内直视手术的患者在术后8 ~ 12天的住院心脏康复期间入组。方法:将患者随机分为两组,一组接受胸骨上的干扰电流刺激(共21天6次),另一组接受假刺激。所有参与者都接受了相同的标准化心脏康复计划。主要结局是21天内疼痛减轻。次要结局包括止痛药使用、炎症细胞因子水平、肺功能、伤口愈合和不良事件。结果:与假治疗相比,干扰电流刺激显著降低疼痛评分。干预组镇痛药的使用减少更多。观察到肿瘤坏死因子α和白细胞介素6水平的更大降低。两组患者肺功能和生活质量均有改善,组间无显著差异。干预组无不良反应和伤口感染发生。结论:连续干扰电流刺激是一种安全有效的非药物治疗方法,可减少胸骨切开术后疼痛和心脏康复镇痛的使用。这种作用可能是通过调节炎症细胞因子介导的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
102
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine is an international peer-review journal published in English, with at least 10 issues published per year. Original articles, reviews, case reports, short communications, special reports and letters to the editor are published, as also are editorials and book reviews. The journal strives to provide its readers with a variety of topics, including: functional assessment and intervention studies, clinical studies in various patient groups, methodology in physical and rehabilitation medicine, epidemiological studies on disabling conditions and reports on vocational and sociomedical aspects of rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信