Real-world evaluation of CDK4/6 inhibitors in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: prognostic effect of proton pump inhibitor use.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Oncologist Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1093/oncolo/oyaf268
Bo-Fang Chen, Jiun-I Lai, Yi-Fang Tsai, Pei-Ju Lien, Yen-Shu Lin, Chin-Jung Feng, Yen-Jen Chen, Han-Fang Cheng, Ta-Chung Chao, Chun-Yu Liu, Ling-Ming Tseng, Chi-Cheng Huang
{"title":"Real-world evaluation of CDK4/6 inhibitors in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: prognostic effect of proton pump inhibitor use.","authors":"Bo-Fang Chen, Jiun-I Lai, Yi-Fang Tsai, Pei-Ju Lien, Yen-Shu Lin, Chin-Jung Feng, Yen-Jen Chen, Han-Fang Cheng, Ta-Chung Chao, Chun-Yu Liu, Ling-Ming Tseng, Chi-Cheng Huang","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>This study highlights the potential negative impact of the co-administration of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) on treatment outcomes in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic and recurrent breast cancer who were receiving CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) treatment, providing real-world evidence to guide treatment strategies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether the co-administration of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) affects treatment outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), in patients with HR+ metastatic and recurrent breast cancer receiving CDK4/6i treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 55.7% patients in the no-antacid group, 33.1% in the PPI group, and 11.1% in the H2-blocker only group. Patients receiving PPI in combination with CDK4/6i and endocrine therapy had significantly shorter PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.298, P < 0.001) and OS (HR = 3.03, P < 0.001). The H2 blocker group also showed a trend toward poorer PFS (HR = 1.987, P < 0.001) and OS compared with those without antacid use (HR = 3.380, P = 0.226). These trends were shown in both the overall cohort and first-line treatment, regardless of the specific CDK4/6i used. No significant differences were observed between types of PPIs. Additionally, increased PPI usage time proportion during CDK4/6i treatment was associated with a higher risk of disease progression and mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>The use of PPIs and H2 blockers, in combination with CDK4/6i, was associated with adverse effects on PFS and OS in patients with HR+ metastatic or recurrent breast cancer in a real-world setting. Clinicians should exercise caution when prescribing PPIs to patients undergoing CDK4/6i therapy.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>In this retrospective analysis of 359 patients, the co-administration of PPIs with CDK4/6i was associated with significantly shorter PFS and OS. Clinicians should be cautious when prescribing PPIs to patients receiving CDK4/6i therapy due to the potential for adverse effects on treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12505142/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf268","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: This study highlights the potential negative impact of the co-administration of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) on treatment outcomes in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic and recurrent breast cancer who were receiving CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) treatment, providing real-world evidence to guide treatment strategies.

Objective: To determine whether the co-administration of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) affects treatment outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), in patients with HR+ metastatic and recurrent breast cancer receiving CDK4/6i treatment.

Results: There were 55.7% patients in the no-antacid group, 33.1% in the PPI group, and 11.1% in the H2-blocker only group. Patients receiving PPI in combination with CDK4/6i and endocrine therapy had significantly shorter PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.298, P < 0.001) and OS (HR = 3.03, P < 0.001). The H2 blocker group also showed a trend toward poorer PFS (HR = 1.987, P < 0.001) and OS compared with those without antacid use (HR = 3.380, P = 0.226). These trends were shown in both the overall cohort and first-line treatment, regardless of the specific CDK4/6i used. No significant differences were observed between types of PPIs. Additionally, increased PPI usage time proportion during CDK4/6i treatment was associated with a higher risk of disease progression and mortality.

Conclusion and relevance: The use of PPIs and H2 blockers, in combination with CDK4/6i, was associated with adverse effects on PFS and OS in patients with HR+ metastatic or recurrent breast cancer in a real-world setting. Clinicians should exercise caution when prescribing PPIs to patients undergoing CDK4/6i therapy.

Key points: In this retrospective analysis of 359 patients, the co-administration of PPIs with CDK4/6i was associated with significantly shorter PFS and OS. Clinicians should be cautious when prescribing PPIs to patients receiving CDK4/6i therapy due to the potential for adverse effects on treatment outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

CDK4/6抑制剂在激素受体阳性转移性乳腺癌中的实际评估:质子泵抑制剂使用的预后影响
背景:本研究评估质子泵抑制剂(PPI)联合给药对激素受体阳性(HR+)转移性和复发性乳腺癌患者接受CDK4/6抑制剂(CDK4/6i)治疗的预后影响,为指导治疗策略提供现实证据。材料与方法:回顾性分析2018 - 2023年间接受治疗的359例HR+转移复发乳腺癌患者。比较接受CDK4/6i +内分泌治疗而不使用任何抗酸药物的患者和联合使用PPI或H2受体阻滞剂的患者的特征和结果。结果:无抗酸药组占55.7%,PPI组占33.1%,仅h2受体阻滞剂组占11.1%。PPI联合CDK4/6i和内分泌治疗的患者PFS显著缩短(HR = 2.298, p)。结论:在现实世界中,PPIs和H2阻滞剂联合CDK4/6i与HR+转移性或复发性乳腺癌患者PFS和OS的不良影响相关。临床医生在给接受CDK4/6抑制剂治疗的患者开质子泵抑制剂时应谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oncologist
Oncologist 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
309
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信