A bibliometric analysis of publications on delusions: revealing the current state of the field and future trends.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Xianhang Zhu, Jiayuan Liu, WenZhuo Wei, Lijun Ma, He Du, Anran Jin, Jingyi He, Xiaoming Li
{"title":"A bibliometric analysis of publications on delusions: revealing the current state of the field and future trends.","authors":"Xianhang Zhu, Jiayuan Liu, WenZhuo Wei, Lijun Ma, He Du, Anran Jin, Jingyi He, Xiaoming Li","doi":"10.1080/13548506.2025.2552964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Delusions are present in various mental disorders and psychological distress; the mechanisms underlying delusion formation are shared among these conditions to some extent. To elucidate the dynamic evolution of the delusion research field from its inception to the present, this study aims to delineate the current state of delusion research and identify future research frontiers. A comprehensive analysis of publications in the field of delusions using the bibliometric tool CiteSpace. The author collaboration network displays a radial layout centered on Freeman Daniel, surrounded by multiple collaborative clusters. The institutional collaboration network is relatively sparse but retains some structural organization, with institutions such as the University of London, University College London, Harvard University and Yale University holding significant influence in the field. The United States and the United Kingdom are the leading countries in academic output within the field, with two representative co-authored publications being highly cited. Keywords with guiding significance for future research include the following: 'mental health', 'anxiety', 'health', 'psychometric property', 'case report', 'paranoia', 'auditory verbal hallucinations' and 'validity'. Delusion research has evolved from sparse early 20th-century studies to a mature, diverse field, shifting from psychoanalysis to empirical, mechanistic approaches. In recent years, the research field has become more mature and specialized. Despite vibrant contributions, fragmented research networks and regional clustering highlight opportunities for interdisciplinary and international collaboration. Future directions include the rise of novel adjunctive intervention technologies, refined studies and interventions targeting cognitive mechanisms, integration of social and psychological factors, exploration of neural mechanisms, personalized and modular interventions, transdiagnostic research, integration of phenomenology and computational models, and rise of computational psychiatry.</p>","PeriodicalId":54535,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Health & Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Health & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2025.2552964","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Delusions are present in various mental disorders and psychological distress; the mechanisms underlying delusion formation are shared among these conditions to some extent. To elucidate the dynamic evolution of the delusion research field from its inception to the present, this study aims to delineate the current state of delusion research and identify future research frontiers. A comprehensive analysis of publications in the field of delusions using the bibliometric tool CiteSpace. The author collaboration network displays a radial layout centered on Freeman Daniel, surrounded by multiple collaborative clusters. The institutional collaboration network is relatively sparse but retains some structural organization, with institutions such as the University of London, University College London, Harvard University and Yale University holding significant influence in the field. The United States and the United Kingdom are the leading countries in academic output within the field, with two representative co-authored publications being highly cited. Keywords with guiding significance for future research include the following: 'mental health', 'anxiety', 'health', 'psychometric property', 'case report', 'paranoia', 'auditory verbal hallucinations' and 'validity'. Delusion research has evolved from sparse early 20th-century studies to a mature, diverse field, shifting from psychoanalysis to empirical, mechanistic approaches. In recent years, the research field has become more mature and specialized. Despite vibrant contributions, fragmented research networks and regional clustering highlight opportunities for interdisciplinary and international collaboration. Future directions include the rise of novel adjunctive intervention technologies, refined studies and interventions targeting cognitive mechanisms, integration of social and psychological factors, exploration of neural mechanisms, personalized and modular interventions, transdiagnostic research, integration of phenomenology and computational models, and rise of computational psychiatry.

妄想出版物的文献计量学分析:揭示该领域的现状和未来趋势。
妄想存在于各种精神障碍和心理困扰中;在某种程度上,错觉形成的机制在这些条件中是共同的。为了阐明妄想研究领域从诞生到现在的动态演变,本研究旨在描述妄想研究的现状并确定未来的研究前沿。使用文献计量工具CiteSpace对妄想领域的出版物进行全面分析。作者协作网络以Freeman Daniel为中心呈放射状布局,周围环绕着多个协作集群。机构合作网络相对稀疏,但保留了一些结构性组织,伦敦大学、伦敦大学学院、哈佛大学和耶鲁大学等机构在该领域具有重要影响。美国和英国在该领域的学术产出方面处于领先地位,两篇具有代表性的合著出版物被高度引用。对今后研究具有指导意义的关键词有:“心理健康”、“焦虑”、“健康”、“心理测量属性”、“病例报告”、“偏执”、“言语幻听”和“效度”。妄想研究已经从20世纪早期的稀疏研究发展成为一个成熟的、多样化的领域,从精神分析转向经验主义的、机械的方法。近年来,该领域的研究日趋成熟和专业化。尽管有活跃的贡献,但零散的研究网络和区域集群突出了跨学科和国际合作的机会。未来的发展方向包括新型辅助干预技术的兴起、针对认知机制的精细化研究和干预、社会和心理因素的整合、神经机制的探索、个性化和模块化干预、跨诊断研究、现象学和计算模型的整合以及计算精神病学的兴起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychology Health & Medicine
Psychology Health & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychology, Health & Medicine is a multidisciplinary journal highlighting human factors in health. The journal provides a peer reviewed forum to report on issues of psychology and health in practice. This key publication reaches an international audience, highlighting the variation and similarities within different settings and exploring multiple health and illness issues from theoretical, practical and management perspectives. It provides a critical forum to examine the wide range of applied health and illness issues and how they incorporate psychological knowledge, understanding, theory and intervention. The journal reflects the growing recognition of psychosocial issues as they affect health planning, medical care, disease reaction, intervention, quality of life, adjustment adaptation and management. For many years theoretical research was very distant from applied understanding. The emerging movement in health psychology, changes in medical care provision and training, and consumer awareness of health issues all contribute to a growing need for applied research. This journal focuses on practical applications of theory, research and experience and provides a bridge between academic knowledge, illness experience, wellbeing and health care practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信