Influence of traditionality and modernity on public breastfeeding behaviors: a theory of planned behavior approach.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Lin Cheng, Wen-Chi Wu, Yihjin Jin Hu, Chih Chien Cheng
{"title":"Influence of traditionality and modernity on public breastfeeding behaviors: a theory of planned behavior approach.","authors":"Lin Cheng, Wen-Chi Wu, Yihjin Jin Hu, Chih Chien Cheng","doi":"10.1186/s13006-025-00761-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast milk is widely recognized as the optimal source of infant nutrition, with the World Health Organization recommending exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months. However, breastfeeding rates remain suboptimal worldwide and in Taiwan. The six-month exclusive breastfeeding rate in Taiwan, defined as the percentage of infants aged six months who received only breast milk and no other foods or liquids in the previous 24 h, declined from 46.2% in 2018 to 37.9% in 2020. One barrier to continued breastfeeding is the discomfort or hesitation some mothers feel when breastfeeding in public. While qualitative research has indicated that conservative values may inhibit public breastfeeding, few quantitative studies have examined the simultaneous influence of traditionality and modernity. This study investigates how traditionality and modernity affect public breastfeeding behavior in Taiwan, using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) as a framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey was conducted from 4 to 15 March 2024, recruiting 358 Taiwanese mothers with prior breastfeeding experience via social media. Validated instruments measured traditionality, modernity, TPB constructs (attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, and intention), and frequency of public breastfeeding. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, bivariate correlations, and structural equation modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Traditionality was negatively associated with attitudes (β = -0.30), perceived control (β = -0.11), intention (β = -0.14), and public breastfeeding behavior (β = -0.14). Modernity indirectly promoted public breastfeeding through positive links with attitudes (β = 0.12), subjective norms (β = 0.23), and perceived control (β = 0.26). Intention strongly predicted behavior (β = 0.60). The model explained 42% of the variance (CFI = 0.99, SRMR = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study confirms that traditionality may hinder public breastfeeding, while modernity enhances it by shaping attitudes, norms, and control beliefs. These findings have important implications for public health policy and practice. Since traditionality and modernity influence behavior through distinct psychological pathways, interventions should be culturally tailored. For mothers with high traditionality, mobilizing family and community support may reinforce positive norms. For those with strong modern values, strategies should focus on autonomy, self-efficacy, and informed decision-making to support breastfeeding in public spaces.</p>","PeriodicalId":54266,"journal":{"name":"International Breastfeeding Journal","volume":"20 1","pages":"66"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12369124/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Breastfeeding Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-025-00761-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breast milk is widely recognized as the optimal source of infant nutrition, with the World Health Organization recommending exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months. However, breastfeeding rates remain suboptimal worldwide and in Taiwan. The six-month exclusive breastfeeding rate in Taiwan, defined as the percentage of infants aged six months who received only breast milk and no other foods or liquids in the previous 24 h, declined from 46.2% in 2018 to 37.9% in 2020. One barrier to continued breastfeeding is the discomfort or hesitation some mothers feel when breastfeeding in public. While qualitative research has indicated that conservative values may inhibit public breastfeeding, few quantitative studies have examined the simultaneous influence of traditionality and modernity. This study investigates how traditionality and modernity affect public breastfeeding behavior in Taiwan, using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) as a framework.

Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted from 4 to 15 March 2024, recruiting 358 Taiwanese mothers with prior breastfeeding experience via social media. Validated instruments measured traditionality, modernity, TPB constructs (attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, and intention), and frequency of public breastfeeding. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, bivariate correlations, and structural equation modeling.

Results: Traditionality was negatively associated with attitudes (β = -0.30), perceived control (β = -0.11), intention (β = -0.14), and public breastfeeding behavior (β = -0.14). Modernity indirectly promoted public breastfeeding through positive links with attitudes (β = 0.12), subjective norms (β = 0.23), and perceived control (β = 0.26). Intention strongly predicted behavior (β = 0.60). The model explained 42% of the variance (CFI = 0.99, SRMR = 0.05).

Conclusions: The study confirms that traditionality may hinder public breastfeeding, while modernity enhances it by shaping attitudes, norms, and control beliefs. These findings have important implications for public health policy and practice. Since traditionality and modernity influence behavior through distinct psychological pathways, interventions should be culturally tailored. For mothers with high traditionality, mobilizing family and community support may reinforce positive norms. For those with strong modern values, strategies should focus on autonomy, self-efficacy, and informed decision-making to support breastfeeding in public spaces.

Abstract Image

传统与现代对公共场合母乳喂养行为的影响:一个计划行为方法的理论。
背景:母乳被广泛认为是婴儿营养的最佳来源,世界卫生组织建议在头六个月纯母乳喂养。然而,母乳喂养率在全球和台湾仍不理想。台湾6个月纯母乳喂养率(定义为6个月大的婴儿在过去24小时内只接受母乳而不接受其他食物或液体的百分比)从2018年的46.2%下降到2020年的37.9%。继续母乳喂养的一个障碍是一些母亲在公共场合哺乳时感到不舒服或犹豫。虽然定性研究表明,保守的价值观可能会抑制公共场合母乳喂养,但很少有定量研究考察了传统和现代的同时影响。本研究以计划行为理论(TPB)为研究框架,探讨传统与现代对台湾公众母乳喂养行为的影响。方法:于2024年3月4日至15日进行横断面在线调查,通过社交媒体招募358名有过母乳喂养经历的台湾母亲。经过验证的工具测量了传统性、现代性、TPB结构(态度、主观规范、感知行为控制和意图)和公共母乳喂养的频率。使用描述性统计、双变量相关性和结构方程模型分析数据。结果:传统性与态度(β = -0.30)、感知控制(β = -0.11)、意图(β = -0.14)和公共场合母乳喂养行为(β = -0.14)呈负相关。现代性通过与态度(β = 0.12)、主观规范(β = 0.23)和感知控制(β = 0.26)的正相关间接促进了公共母乳喂养。意向强烈预测行为(β = 0.60)。该模型解释了42%的方差(CFI = 0.99, SRMR = 0.05)。结论:研究证实,传统可能会阻碍公共场所母乳喂养,而现代性通过塑造态度、规范和控制信念来加强母乳喂养。这些发现对公共卫生政策和实践具有重要意义。由于传统和现代通过不同的心理途径影响行为,干预措施应根据文化进行调整。对于传统观念较高的母亲,动员家庭和社区的支持可能会加强积极的规范。对于那些具有强烈现代价值观的人来说,策略应侧重于自主、自我效能和知情决策,以支持在公共场所进行母乳喂养。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Breastfeeding Journal
International Breastfeeding Journal Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
76
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊介绍: Breastfeeding is recognized as an important public health issue with enormous social and economic implications. Infants who do not receive breast milk are likely to experience poorer health outcomes than breastfed infants; mothers who do not breastfeed increase their own health risks. Publications on the topic of breastfeeding are wide ranging. Articles about breastfeeding are currently published journals focused on nursing, midwifery, paediatric, obstetric, family medicine, public health, immunology, physiology, sociology and many other topics. In addition, electronic publishing allows fast publication time for authors and Open Access ensures the journal is easily accessible to readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信