Impact of a deep learning image reconstruction algorithm on the robustness of abdominal computed tomography radiomics features using standard and low radiation doses.

Abstract

Background: Deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) can enhance image quality and lower image dose, yet its impact on radiomics features (RFs) remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the effects of DLIR and conventional adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASIR-V) algorithms on the robustness of RFs using standard and low-dose abdominal clinical computed tomography (CT) scans.

Methods: A total of 54 patients with hepatic masses who underwent abdominal contrast-enhanced CT scans were retrospectively analyzed. The raw data of standard dose in the venous phase and low dose in the delayed phase were reconstructed using five reconstruction settings, including ASIR-V at 30% (ASIR-V30%) and 70% (ASIR-V70%) levels, and DLIR at low (DLIR-L), medium (DLIR-M), and high (DLIR-H) levels. The PyRadiomics platform was used for the extraction of RFs in 18 regions of interest (ROIs) in different organs or tissues. The consistency of RFs among different algorithms and different strength levels was tested by coefficient of variation (CV) and quartile coefficient of dispersion (QCD). The consistency of RFs among different strength levels of the same algorithm and clinically comparable levels across algorithms was evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Robust features were identified by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U test.

Results: Among the five reconstruction methods, the mean CV and QCD in the standard-dose group were 0.364 and 0.213, respectively, and the corresponding values were 0.444 and 0.245 in the low-dose group. The mean ICC values between ASIR-V 30% and 70%, DLIR-L and M, DLIR-M and H, DLIR-L and H, ASIR-V30% and DLIR-M, and ASIR-V70% and DLIR-H were 0.672, 0.734, 0.756, 0.629, 0.724, and 0.651, respectively, in the standard-dose group, and the corresponding values were 0.500, 0.567, 0.700, 0.474, 0.499, and 0.650 in the low-dose group. The ICC values between DLIR-M and H under low-dose conditions were even higher than those of ASIR-V30% and -V70% under standard dose conditions. Among the five reconstruction settings, averages of 14.0% (117/837) and 10.3% (86/837) of RFs across 18 ROIs exhibited robustness under standard-dose and low-dose conditions, respectively. Some 23.1% (193/837) of RFs demonstrated robustness between the low-dose DLIR-M and H groups, which was higher than the 21.0% (176/837) observed in the standard-dose ASIR-V30% and -V70% groups.

Conclusions: Most of the RFs lacked reproducibility across algorithms and energy levels. However, DLIR at medium (M) and high (H) levels significantly improved RFs consistency and robustness, even at reduced doses.