Association of coronary artery calcium score with cardiovascular events: a retrospective study.

IF 2.3 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-12 DOI:10.21037/qims-2025-549
Xun Yu, Guifang Li, Wenbo Yin, Junni Hu
{"title":"Association of coronary artery calcium score with cardiovascular events: a retrospective study.","authors":"Xun Yu, Guifang Li, Wenbo Yin, Junni Hu","doi":"10.21037/qims-2025-549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The coronary artery calcium score (CACS) reflects coronary atherosclerosis burden, but its predictive value in different populations remains to be fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive value of CACS for cardiovascular events in different patient populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred patients (mean age 65.4±10.7 years; 63 males) who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) were retrospectively enrolled and classified into four CACS strata (0, 1-100, 101-399, ≥400). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) at 1 year. Survival curves and Cox regression were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with CACS ≥400 had the lowest 1-year survival probability (log-rank P=0.011), while CACS =0 group had the highest survival. Cox regression suggested CACS ≥400 was associated with a 4.76-fold higher risk of mortality or MACE compared to CACS =0 [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 4.76, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.82-12.45, P=0.012], after adjusting for age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia. Significant predictors included male sex (HR 3.72, P=0.047), smoking (HR 2.87, P=0.013), and hypertension (HR 4.76, P=0.009). In subgroup analysis, the predictive value of CACS was robust in males (P=0.0031) and hypertensive patients (P=0.021), but not significant in females or normotensives (P>0.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CACS is a significant independent predictor of mortality and MACE in symptomatic patients, with the strongest discriminative power in males and those with hypertension. These findings support the utility of CACS for risk stratification and early identification of high-risk individuals in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":54267,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","volume":"15 9","pages":"8230-8238"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12397672/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-2025-549","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The coronary artery calcium score (CACS) reflects coronary atherosclerosis burden, but its predictive value in different populations remains to be fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive value of CACS for cardiovascular events in different patient populations.

Methods: One hundred patients (mean age 65.4±10.7 years; 63 males) who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) were retrospectively enrolled and classified into four CACS strata (0, 1-100, 101-399, ≥400). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) at 1 year. Survival curves and Cox regression were performed.

Results: Patients with CACS ≥400 had the lowest 1-year survival probability (log-rank P=0.011), while CACS =0 group had the highest survival. Cox regression suggested CACS ≥400 was associated with a 4.76-fold higher risk of mortality or MACE compared to CACS =0 [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 4.76, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.82-12.45, P=0.012], after adjusting for age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia. Significant predictors included male sex (HR 3.72, P=0.047), smoking (HR 2.87, P=0.013), and hypertension (HR 4.76, P=0.009). In subgroup analysis, the predictive value of CACS was robust in males (P=0.0031) and hypertensive patients (P=0.021), but not significant in females or normotensives (P>0.5).

Conclusions: CACS is a significant independent predictor of mortality and MACE in symptomatic patients, with the strongest discriminative power in males and those with hypertension. These findings support the utility of CACS for risk stratification and early identification of high-risk individuals in clinical practice.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

冠状动脉钙评分与心血管事件的关联:一项回顾性研究。
背景:冠状动脉钙评分(CACS)反映了冠状动脉粥样硬化负担,但其在不同人群中的预测价值仍有待充分阐明。本研究的目的是探讨CACS对不同患者群体心血管事件的预测价值。方法:回顾性收集100例行冠状动脉ct血管造影(CCTA)的患者(平均年龄65.4±10.7岁,男性63例),将其分为4个CACS层(0、1 ~ 100、101 ~ 399、≥400)。主要终点是1年的全因死亡率和主要不良心血管事件(mace)。进行生存曲线和Cox回归分析。结果:CACS≥400组患者1年生存率最低(log-rank P=0.011), CACS =0组患者1年生存率最高。Cox回归显示,在校正了年龄、性别、高血压、糖尿病和血脂异常等因素后,与CACS =0相比,CACS≥400与死亡或MACE风险增加4.76倍相关[校正风险比(HR) 4.76, 95%可信区间(CI): 1.82-12.45, P=0.012]。显著的预测因素包括男性(HR 3.72, P=0.047)、吸烟(HR 2.87, P=0.013)和高血压(HR 4.76, P=0.009)。在亚组分析中,CACS对男性(P=0.0031)和高血压患者(P=0.021)的预测价值较强,而对女性和血压正常者的预测价值不显著(P < 0.05)。结论:CACS是有症状患者死亡率和MACE的重要独立预测因子,在男性和高血压患者中鉴别力最强。这些发现支持CACS在临床实践中用于风险分层和早期识别高风险个体的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
17.90%
发文量
252
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信