Mixed methods systematic review of consumer engagement in rural health practice, research, and education.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Talisker Broadhurst, Yu Jin Cha, Caitlin Bartlett, Johanna Van Heerden, Lauren Smith, Lucylynn Lizarondo, Matthew McGrail, Bushra Nasir, Adam Hulme, Srinivas Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan, Priya Martin
{"title":"Mixed methods systematic review of consumer engagement in rural health practice, research, and education.","authors":"Talisker Broadhurst, Yu Jin Cha, Caitlin Bartlett, Johanna Van Heerden, Lauren Smith, Lucylynn Lizarondo, Matthew McGrail, Bushra Nasir, Adam Hulme, Srinivas Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan, Priya Martin","doi":"10.1093/heapro/daaf140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review aimed to synthesize evidence on consumer engagement in rural health practice, research, and education. It was conducted using the JBI mixed methods methodology, specifically the convergent integrated approach. PubMed, PsychINFO, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, Web of Science, EMBASE, and CINAHL were searched, along with gray literature sources-Google, ProQuest Dissertation, and Theses Global. Primary research studies published globally in English, from 2011 to 2024 were included. Dual reviewer screening occurred in two stages, title and abstract, then followed by full text. Critical appraisals of included studies were undertaken using McMaster Critical Appraisal Tool for quantitative and qualitative studies, respectively, and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Extracted data was synthesized to develop themes for reporting per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. This review identified 25 studies that explored the top three levels of consumer involvement in rural healthcare settings, namely Partnership, Involving, and Consumer-led, adapted from the 2011 National Framework for Consumer Involvement in Cancer Control. Five key themes were developed from the data: positive impacts of co-design, importance of relationship building, sustainability of interventions, power issues in co-design, and the importance of context. Findings showed that interventions utilizing the top three partnership levels (consumer-led, partnership, and involving) consistently lead to positive impacts on health outcomes of rural communities with higher levels of sustained engagement. Enablers and barriers were identified and categorized into a macro, micro, and meso framework for direct comparison between studies. Rural healthcare initiatives involving consumer engagement appear to have several benefits including strengthening community-researcher relationships, enhanced sustainability, and enriching local contexts while addressing power imbalances to enhance healthcare outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":54256,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion International","volume":"40 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12394724/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaf140","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This systematic review aimed to synthesize evidence on consumer engagement in rural health practice, research, and education. It was conducted using the JBI mixed methods methodology, specifically the convergent integrated approach. PubMed, PsychINFO, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, Web of Science, EMBASE, and CINAHL were searched, along with gray literature sources-Google, ProQuest Dissertation, and Theses Global. Primary research studies published globally in English, from 2011 to 2024 were included. Dual reviewer screening occurred in two stages, title and abstract, then followed by full text. Critical appraisals of included studies were undertaken using McMaster Critical Appraisal Tool for quantitative and qualitative studies, respectively, and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Extracted data was synthesized to develop themes for reporting per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. This review identified 25 studies that explored the top three levels of consumer involvement in rural healthcare settings, namely Partnership, Involving, and Consumer-led, adapted from the 2011 National Framework for Consumer Involvement in Cancer Control. Five key themes were developed from the data: positive impacts of co-design, importance of relationship building, sustainability of interventions, power issues in co-design, and the importance of context. Findings showed that interventions utilizing the top three partnership levels (consumer-led, partnership, and involving) consistently lead to positive impacts on health outcomes of rural communities with higher levels of sustained engagement. Enablers and barriers were identified and categorized into a macro, micro, and meso framework for direct comparison between studies. Rural healthcare initiatives involving consumer engagement appear to have several benefits including strengthening community-researcher relationships, enhanced sustainability, and enriching local contexts while addressing power imbalances to enhance healthcare outcomes.

Abstract Image

农村卫生实践、研究和教育中消费者参与的混合方法系统综述。
本系统综述旨在综合消费者参与农村卫生实践、研究和教育的证据。它是使用JBI混合方法方法论进行的,特别是收敛集成方法。检索PubMed, PsychINFO, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, Web of Science, EMBASE和CINAHL,以及灰色文献来源- google, ProQuest Dissertation和Theses Global。纳入了2011年至2024年在全球范围内用英语发表的主要研究报告。双重审稿人筛选分为标题和摘要两个阶段,然后是全文。分别使用定量和定性研究的麦克马斯特关键评估工具和混合方法评估工具对纳入的研究进行了关键评估。根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目,对提取的数据进行综合,以制定报告主题。本综述确定了25项研究,这些研究探讨了消费者参与农村医疗保健机构的前三个层次,即伙伴关系、参与和消费者主导,改编自2011年《消费者参与癌症控制国家框架》。从数据中发展出五个关键主题:共同设计的积极影响、建立关系的重要性、干预措施的可持续性、共同设计中的权力问题以及环境的重要性。调查结果表明,利用前三个伙伴关系水平(消费者主导、伙伴关系和参与)的干预措施始终对持续参与水平较高的农村社区的健康结果产生积极影响。我们确定了促进因素和障碍因素,并将其分为宏观、微观和中观框架,以便在研究之间进行直接比较。涉及消费者参与的农村医疗保健倡议似乎有几个好处,包括加强社区研究人员关系、增强可持续性和丰富当地背景,同时解决权力不平衡问题,以提高医疗保健结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Promotion International
Health Promotion International Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: Health Promotion International contains refereed original articles, reviews, and debate articles on major themes and innovations in the health promotion field. In line with the remits of the series of global conferences on health promotion the journal expressly invites contributions from sectors beyond health. These may include education, employment, government, the media, industry, environmental agencies, and community networks. As the thought journal of the international health promotion movement we seek in particular theoretical, methodological and activist advances to the field. Thus, the journal provides a unique focal point for articles of high quality that describe not only theories and concepts, research projects and policy formulation, but also planned and spontaneous activities, organizational change, as well as social and environmental development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信