Scalability and scaling-up strategy of a physical activity policy intervention in Australian childcare centres.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Hayley Christian, Matthew Mclaughlin, Andrea Nathan, Emma Adams, Adrian Bauman, Patti-Jean Naylor, Trevor Shilton, Carol Maher, Stewart G Trost, Jasper Schipperijn
{"title":"Scalability and scaling-up strategy of a physical activity policy intervention in Australian childcare centres.","authors":"Hayley Christian, Matthew Mclaughlin, Andrea Nathan, Emma Adams, Adrian Bauman, Patti-Jean Naylor, Trevor Shilton, Carol Maher, Stewart G Trost, Jasper Schipperijn","doi":"10.1093/heapro/daaf145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is an urgent need for scalable interventions to promote physical activity in early childhood. An early childhood education and care (ECEC) physical activity policy intervention with implementation support strategies (Play Active) has been proposed for scale-up in Australia. This study sought to assess the scalability of Play Active and describe the Play Active scaling-up strategy. The Intervention Scalability Assessment Tool was used to assess scalability. The PRACTical planning for Implementation and Scale-up (PRACTIS) guided the scaling-up strategy and involved: (i) characterizing the implementation setting; (ii) identifying existing/new partnerships; (iii) identifying barriers and facilitators to implementation; (iv) addressing barriers through adaptations. The Play Active scalability assessment domains with the highest scores (>2.5/3) were for the problem, intervention, reach and acceptability. Four additional domains scored highly (>2/3): fidelity and adaptation, delivery settings and workforce, implementation infrastructure, and strategic/political context. The lowest scores (<2/3) were the evidence of effectiveness, intervention costs and benefits, and sustainability domains. The PRACTIS guide showed that the implementation setting and existing and new partnerships were appropriate for scaling-up Play Active. The PRACTIS guide also identified key barriers (e.g. staff time) and enablers (e.g. staff professional development) to implementation at scale. Adaptations were identified to address these barriers (e.g. intervention delivery via a customised website). Overall, the scalability assessment revealed gaps in some scalability domains to be addressed through further research and adaptation of Play Active. The proposed scale-up trial evaluation is crucial to support decision-makers to fund, scale and institutionalize Play Active in the real world.</p>","PeriodicalId":54256,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion International","volume":"40 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12404913/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaf145","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is an urgent need for scalable interventions to promote physical activity in early childhood. An early childhood education and care (ECEC) physical activity policy intervention with implementation support strategies (Play Active) has been proposed for scale-up in Australia. This study sought to assess the scalability of Play Active and describe the Play Active scaling-up strategy. The Intervention Scalability Assessment Tool was used to assess scalability. The PRACTical planning for Implementation and Scale-up (PRACTIS) guided the scaling-up strategy and involved: (i) characterizing the implementation setting; (ii) identifying existing/new partnerships; (iii) identifying barriers and facilitators to implementation; (iv) addressing barriers through adaptations. The Play Active scalability assessment domains with the highest scores (>2.5/3) were for the problem, intervention, reach and acceptability. Four additional domains scored highly (>2/3): fidelity and adaptation, delivery settings and workforce, implementation infrastructure, and strategic/political context. The lowest scores (<2/3) were the evidence of effectiveness, intervention costs and benefits, and sustainability domains. The PRACTIS guide showed that the implementation setting and existing and new partnerships were appropriate for scaling-up Play Active. The PRACTIS guide also identified key barriers (e.g. staff time) and enablers (e.g. staff professional development) to implementation at scale. Adaptations were identified to address these barriers (e.g. intervention delivery via a customised website). Overall, the scalability assessment revealed gaps in some scalability domains to be addressed through further research and adaptation of Play Active. The proposed scale-up trial evaluation is crucial to support decision-makers to fund, scale and institutionalize Play Active in the real world.

Abstract Image

澳大利亚托儿中心体育活动政策干预的可扩展性和扩大战略。
迫切需要可扩展的干预措施来促进幼儿期的身体活动。澳大利亚提出了一项具有实施支持策略(Play Active)的幼儿教育和护理(ECEC)体育活动政策干预措施,以扩大规模。本研究旨在评估Play Active的可扩展性,并描述Play Active的扩展策略。采用干预可扩展性评估工具评估可扩展性。实施和扩大规模的实际规划(practics)指导扩大战略,涉及:(i)确定实施环境的特征;(ii)确定现有/新的伙伴关系;(iii)确定实施的障碍和促进因素;(四)通过适应解决障碍。得分最高的Play Active可扩展性评估领域(>2.5/3)分别是问题、干预、可达性和可接受性。另外四个领域得分很高(bbbb2 /3):保真度和适应性、交付环境和劳动力、实施基础设施和战略/政治环境。最低分数(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Promotion International
Health Promotion International Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: Health Promotion International contains refereed original articles, reviews, and debate articles on major themes and innovations in the health promotion field. In line with the remits of the series of global conferences on health promotion the journal expressly invites contributions from sectors beyond health. These may include education, employment, government, the media, industry, environmental agencies, and community networks. As the thought journal of the international health promotion movement we seek in particular theoretical, methodological and activist advances to the field. Thus, the journal provides a unique focal point for articles of high quality that describe not only theories and concepts, research projects and policy formulation, but also planned and spontaneous activities, organizational change, as well as social and environmental development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信