Drug-coated balloon with bailout stenting versus drug-eluting stent plus drug-coated balloon in TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus C and D femoropopliteal lesions: a propensity score-matched analysis.

IF 2.3 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-14 DOI:10.21037/qims-2025-367
Caibo Chen, Haitao Guan, Siyuan Shen, Pengyu Li, Kang She, Gong Cheng, Guochen Niu, Ziguang Yan, Ziping Yao, Yinghua Zou, Min Yang, Bihui Zhang
{"title":"Drug-coated balloon with bailout stenting versus drug-eluting stent plus drug-coated balloon in TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus C and D femoropopliteal lesions: a propensity score-matched analysis.","authors":"Caibo Chen, Haitao Guan, Siyuan Shen, Pengyu Li, Kang She, Gong Cheng, Guochen Niu, Ziguang Yan, Ziping Yao, Yinghua Zou, Min Yang, Bihui Zhang","doi":"10.21037/qims-2025-367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drug-delivering devices have shown efficacy in clinical trials and are widely used for femoropopliteal artery disease. However, the optimal strategy for complex lesions, such as TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) C and D lesions, remains debated in real-world practice. This propensity score-matched study aimed to compare the mid-term outcomes between a double-drug strategy [drug-coated balloon (DCB) combined with systemic drug-eluting stents (DES)] and a DCB bailout strategy (DCB with bailout bare-metal stents) in patients with TASC C and D femoropopliteal lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center study included TASC C and D femoropopliteal patients treated with DCB from October 2016 to July 2024. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed in a 1:3 ratio, with one patient in the double-drug strategy group for every three in the DCB bailout group. The primary endpoint was 24-month primary patency. Secondary endpoints included freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), mortality, complications, symptom improvement, and risk factors for restenosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After PSM, 32 pairs of patients were analyzed. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced [standardized mean difference (SMD) <0.2 for all covariates]. Primary patency rates at 24 months were comparable (double-drug <i>vs.</i> DCB bailout: 64.5% <i>vs.</i> 76.4%, P=0.76). Freedom from CD-TLR showed no significant difference at 24 months (double-drug <i>vs.</i> DCB bailout: 95.8% <i>vs.</i> 79.1%, P=0.20). The double drug group demonstrated superior Rutherford category improvement (P=0.042). Mortality and complication rates were similar between groups. Dyslipidemia was identified as an independent predictor of loss of primary patency [hazard ratio (HR) =3.03, P=0.024].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The double-drug strategy and DCB bailout strategy yielded comparable 24-month patency and freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) in TASC C and D lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54267,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","volume":"15 9","pages":"7727-7737"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12397624/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-2025-367","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Drug-delivering devices have shown efficacy in clinical trials and are widely used for femoropopliteal artery disease. However, the optimal strategy for complex lesions, such as TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) C and D lesions, remains debated in real-world practice. This propensity score-matched study aimed to compare the mid-term outcomes between a double-drug strategy [drug-coated balloon (DCB) combined with systemic drug-eluting stents (DES)] and a DCB bailout strategy (DCB with bailout bare-metal stents) in patients with TASC C and D femoropopliteal lesions.

Methods: This retrospective single-center study included TASC C and D femoropopliteal patients treated with DCB from October 2016 to July 2024. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed in a 1:3 ratio, with one patient in the double-drug strategy group for every three in the DCB bailout group. The primary endpoint was 24-month primary patency. Secondary endpoints included freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), mortality, complications, symptom improvement, and risk factors for restenosis.

Results: After PSM, 32 pairs of patients were analyzed. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced [standardized mean difference (SMD) <0.2 for all covariates]. Primary patency rates at 24 months were comparable (double-drug vs. DCB bailout: 64.5% vs. 76.4%, P=0.76). Freedom from CD-TLR showed no significant difference at 24 months (double-drug vs. DCB bailout: 95.8% vs. 79.1%, P=0.20). The double drug group demonstrated superior Rutherford category improvement (P=0.042). Mortality and complication rates were similar between groups. Dyslipidemia was identified as an independent predictor of loss of primary patency [hazard ratio (HR) =3.03, P=0.024].

Conclusions: The double-drug strategy and DCB bailout strategy yielded comparable 24-month patency and freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) in TASC C and D lesions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

药物包被球囊与救助支架与药物洗脱支架加药物包被球囊在跨大西洋国际学会共识C和D股腘动脉病变中的对比:倾向评分匹配分析。
背景:药物传递装置已在临床试验中显示出疗效,并被广泛用于股腘动脉疾病。然而,对于复杂病变的最佳策略,如跨大西洋社会共识(TASC) C和D病变,在现实世界的实践中仍存在争议。本倾向评分匹配研究旨在比较双药策略[药物包被球囊(DCB)联合全身药物洗脱支架(DES)]和DCB救助策略(DCB +救助裸金属支架)对TASC和D股动脉病变患者的中期结果。方法:本研究为回顾性单中心研究,纳入2016年10月至2024年7月接受DCB治疗的TASC、C和D股腘静脉患者。倾向评分匹配(PSM)按1:3的比例进行,双药策略组1例患者对应DCB救助组3例患者。主要终点为24个月原发性通畅。次要终点包括无临床驱动的靶病变血运重建(CD-TLR)、死亡率、并发症、症状改善和再狭窄的危险因素。结果:经PSM后,对32对患者进行分析。基线特征平衡良好[标准化平均差(SMD)与DCB救助:64.5%对76.4%,P=0.76]。在24个月时,CD-TLR的自由度无显著差异(双药与DCB救助:95.8%对79.1%,P=0.20)。双药组卢瑟福分类改善显著(P=0.042)。两组间死亡率和并发症发生率相似。血脂异常被确定为原发性通畅丧失的独立预测因子[危险比(HR) =3.03, P=0.024]。结论:双药策略和DCB救助策略在TASC C和D病变中获得了24个月的通畅和无靶病变血运重建(TLR)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
17.90%
发文量
252
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信