Drug-coated balloon with bailout stenting versus drug-eluting stent plus drug-coated balloon in TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus C and D femoropopliteal lesions: a propensity score-matched analysis.
IF 2.3 2区 医学Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Caibo Chen, Haitao Guan, Siyuan Shen, Pengyu Li, Kang She, Gong Cheng, Guochen Niu, Ziguang Yan, Ziping Yao, Yinghua Zou, Min Yang, Bihui Zhang
{"title":"Drug-coated balloon with bailout stenting versus drug-eluting stent plus drug-coated balloon in TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus C and D femoropopliteal lesions: a propensity score-matched analysis.","authors":"Caibo Chen, Haitao Guan, Siyuan Shen, Pengyu Li, Kang She, Gong Cheng, Guochen Niu, Ziguang Yan, Ziping Yao, Yinghua Zou, Min Yang, Bihui Zhang","doi":"10.21037/qims-2025-367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drug-delivering devices have shown efficacy in clinical trials and are widely used for femoropopliteal artery disease. However, the optimal strategy for complex lesions, such as TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) C and D lesions, remains debated in real-world practice. This propensity score-matched study aimed to compare the mid-term outcomes between a double-drug strategy [drug-coated balloon (DCB) combined with systemic drug-eluting stents (DES)] and a DCB bailout strategy (DCB with bailout bare-metal stents) in patients with TASC C and D femoropopliteal lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center study included TASC C and D femoropopliteal patients treated with DCB from October 2016 to July 2024. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed in a 1:3 ratio, with one patient in the double-drug strategy group for every three in the DCB bailout group. The primary endpoint was 24-month primary patency. Secondary endpoints included freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), mortality, complications, symptom improvement, and risk factors for restenosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After PSM, 32 pairs of patients were analyzed. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced [standardized mean difference (SMD) <0.2 for all covariates]. Primary patency rates at 24 months were comparable (double-drug <i>vs.</i> DCB bailout: 64.5% <i>vs.</i> 76.4%, P=0.76). Freedom from CD-TLR showed no significant difference at 24 months (double-drug <i>vs.</i> DCB bailout: 95.8% <i>vs.</i> 79.1%, P=0.20). The double drug group demonstrated superior Rutherford category improvement (P=0.042). Mortality and complication rates were similar between groups. Dyslipidemia was identified as an independent predictor of loss of primary patency [hazard ratio (HR) =3.03, P=0.024].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The double-drug strategy and DCB bailout strategy yielded comparable 24-month patency and freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) in TASC C and D lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54267,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","volume":"15 9","pages":"7727-7737"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12397624/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-2025-367","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Drug-delivering devices have shown efficacy in clinical trials and are widely used for femoropopliteal artery disease. However, the optimal strategy for complex lesions, such as TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) C and D lesions, remains debated in real-world practice. This propensity score-matched study aimed to compare the mid-term outcomes between a double-drug strategy [drug-coated balloon (DCB) combined with systemic drug-eluting stents (DES)] and a DCB bailout strategy (DCB with bailout bare-metal stents) in patients with TASC C and D femoropopliteal lesions.
Methods: This retrospective single-center study included TASC C and D femoropopliteal patients treated with DCB from October 2016 to July 2024. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed in a 1:3 ratio, with one patient in the double-drug strategy group for every three in the DCB bailout group. The primary endpoint was 24-month primary patency. Secondary endpoints included freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), mortality, complications, symptom improvement, and risk factors for restenosis.
Results: After PSM, 32 pairs of patients were analyzed. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced [standardized mean difference (SMD) <0.2 for all covariates]. Primary patency rates at 24 months were comparable (double-drug vs. DCB bailout: 64.5% vs. 76.4%, P=0.76). Freedom from CD-TLR showed no significant difference at 24 months (double-drug vs. DCB bailout: 95.8% vs. 79.1%, P=0.20). The double drug group demonstrated superior Rutherford category improvement (P=0.042). Mortality and complication rates were similar between groups. Dyslipidemia was identified as an independent predictor of loss of primary patency [hazard ratio (HR) =3.03, P=0.024].
Conclusions: The double-drug strategy and DCB bailout strategy yielded comparable 24-month patency and freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) in TASC C and D lesions.