Robotic ureteroplasty with lingual mucosa graft: a multi-institutional experience.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Shuaishuai Chai, Yuancheng Zhou, Manshun Dong, Gong Cheng, Wei Xiang, Yongqiang You, Qiuxuan Yu, Ruoyu Li, Chaoqi Liang, Jingdong Yuan, Xingyuan Xiao, Bing Li
{"title":"Robotic ureteroplasty with lingual mucosa graft: a multi-institutional experience.","authors":"Shuaishuai Chai, Yuancheng Zhou, Manshun Dong, Gong Cheng, Wei Xiang, Yongqiang You, Qiuxuan Yu, Ruoyu Li, Chaoqi Liang, Jingdong Yuan, Xingyuan Xiao, Bing Li","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06433-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of long proximal ureteral strictures poses a significant challenge, with traditional options such as renal autotransplantation or bowel interposition associated with substantial morbidity. This study explores the use of robotic ureteroplasty with lingual mucosal graft (RU-LMG) as a minimally invasive approach for treating complex ureteral strictures. We present a multi-institutional cohort to evaluate its effectiveness in managing proximal and mid-ureteral strictures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multi-center, retrospective study analyzed perioperative data from 76 patients who underwent RU-LMG at three institutions between January 2021 and December 2023. Patients were selected based on the presence of proximal or mid-ureteral strictures not amenable to primary ureteroureterostomy due to periureteral fibrosis or excessive stricture length. Success was defined as the absence of hydronephrosis, flank pain, or imaging-confirmed obstruction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 76 patients, 48 (63.2%) underwent onlay ureteroplasty, while 28 (36.8%) received augmented anastomotic RU-LMG. Omental wrapping or coverage of the reconstructed ureter was performed in 73 patients (96.1%). The average length of the stricture and graft were 4.0 cm (range: 2.0-11.5 cm) and 4.1 cm (range: 2.0-12.0 cm), respectively. The mean operative time was 205.5 minutes (range: 95-380 minutes), with a mean blood loss of 70.9 mL (range: 10-400 mL). There were no open conversions or intraoperative complications. The follow-up period ranged from 13 to 48 months (mean: 27 months), with a 100% success rate (76/76 patients).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RU-LMG is a safe, effective, and feasible technique for managing complex proximal or mid-ureteral strictures, with excellent medium-term outcomes and minimal morbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"77 4","pages":"500-507"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06433-X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The management of long proximal ureteral strictures poses a significant challenge, with traditional options such as renal autotransplantation or bowel interposition associated with substantial morbidity. This study explores the use of robotic ureteroplasty with lingual mucosal graft (RU-LMG) as a minimally invasive approach for treating complex ureteral strictures. We present a multi-institutional cohort to evaluate its effectiveness in managing proximal and mid-ureteral strictures.

Methods: This multi-center, retrospective study analyzed perioperative data from 76 patients who underwent RU-LMG at three institutions between January 2021 and December 2023. Patients were selected based on the presence of proximal or mid-ureteral strictures not amenable to primary ureteroureterostomy due to periureteral fibrosis or excessive stricture length. Success was defined as the absence of hydronephrosis, flank pain, or imaging-confirmed obstruction.

Results: Of the 76 patients, 48 (63.2%) underwent onlay ureteroplasty, while 28 (36.8%) received augmented anastomotic RU-LMG. Omental wrapping or coverage of the reconstructed ureter was performed in 73 patients (96.1%). The average length of the stricture and graft were 4.0 cm (range: 2.0-11.5 cm) and 4.1 cm (range: 2.0-12.0 cm), respectively. The mean operative time was 205.5 minutes (range: 95-380 minutes), with a mean blood loss of 70.9 mL (range: 10-400 mL). There were no open conversions or intraoperative complications. The follow-up period ranged from 13 to 48 months (mean: 27 months), with a 100% success rate (76/76 patients).

Conclusions: RU-LMG is a safe, effective, and feasible technique for managing complex proximal or mid-ureteral strictures, with excellent medium-term outcomes and minimal morbidity.

机器人输尿管成形术与舌粘膜移植:一个多机构的经验。
背景:输尿管长近端狭窄的治疗面临着巨大的挑战,传统的选择,如肾脏自体移植或肠介入,与大量的发病率相关。本研究探讨了机器人输尿管成形术联合舌粘膜移植(RU-LMG)作为一种微创治疗复杂输尿管狭窄的方法。我们提出了一个多机构队列来评估其在治疗输尿管近端和中端狭窄中的有效性。方法:这项多中心回顾性研究分析了2021年1月至2023年12月在三家机构接受RU-LMG手术的76例患者的围手术期数据。患者的选择是基于输尿管近端或中端狭窄的存在,由于输尿管周围纤维化或狭窄长度过长而不能进行原发性输尿管输尿管输尿管造口术。成功的定义是没有肾积水、侧腹疼痛或影像学证实的梗阻。结果:76例患者中48例(63.2%)行单纯输尿管成形术,28例(36.8%)行吻合口RU-LMG增强术。73例(96.1%)患者行大网膜包裹或覆盖重建输尿管。狭窄和移植物的平均长度分别为4.0 cm(范围2.0 ~ 11.5 cm)和4.1 cm(范围2.0 ~ 12.0 cm)。平均手术时间205.5分钟(范围:95 ~ 380分钟),平均出血量70.9 mL(范围:10 ~ 400 mL)。无开放性转换或术中并发症。随访时间13 ~ 48个月(平均27个月),成功率100%(76/76)。结论:RU-LMG是一种安全、有效、可行的治疗复杂输尿管近端或中端狭窄的技术,具有良好的中期预后和最低的发病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva Urology and Nephrology
Minerva Urology and Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
32.70%
发文量
237
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信