Financial Incentives to Increase Diversity of Older Participants in a Memory Concerns Registry: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 11.3 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Mireille Jacobson, Doris Molina-Henry, Tom Y Chang, Gustavo A Jimenez-Maggiora, Rajiv Pramanik, Samir B Shah, Paul S Aisen
{"title":"Financial Incentives to Increase Diversity of Older Participants in a Memory Concerns Registry: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Mireille Jacobson, Doris Molina-Henry, Tom Y Chang, Gustavo A Jimenez-Maggiora, Rajiv Pramanik, Samir B Shah, Paul S Aisen","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.2273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Persons from marginalized racial and ethnic groups and of low socioeconomic status are at high risk of dementia but are underrepresented in clinical trials. Financial incentives may improve representation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effect of financial incentives on enrollment of county health system patients into a memory concerns registry.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Between March 1, 2024, and April 24, 2024, patients 50 years and older without a dementia diagnosis within a single integrated county health system that includes a hospital and 9 outpatient health centers were invited to enroll in the Alzheimer Prevention Trials (APT) Webstudy, an online observational study aimed at accelerating enrollment into Alzheimer disease clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to an invitation message (arm 1), a message with a small ($25) enrollment incentive (arm 2), or a message with an enrollment incentive of entry into a $2500 lottery with 1 in 100 odds of award (arm 3).</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was enrollment, defined as APT Webstudy registration and completion of at least 1 of 2 remote cognitive assessments. Outcomes were measured through April 30, 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 44 844 patients invited to the APT Webstudy, the mean (SD) age was 64.7 (10.1) years, 25 447 (56.8%) were women, 25 044 (55.8%) had Medicaid insurance, 11 347 (25.3%) were Hispanic/Latino, 9526 (21.2%) were non-Hispanic Asian, 6044 (13.5%) were non-Hispanic Black, and 12 109 (27%) were non-Hispanic White. A total of 401 participants (0.9%) enrolled in the APT Webstudy. Relative to the message-only arm, participants randomized to the small incentive arm were more likely to enroll (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.39; 95% CI, 1.09-1.76; P = .008) in the APT Webstudy while those in the prize incentive arm were not more likely to enroll (adjusted OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.84-1.39; P > .99). Enrollment in the prize incentive arm was lower relative to the small incentive arm (adjusted OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61-0.98; P = .04). Secondary heterogeneity analyses indicated that patients of White race (adjusted OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.15-2.25; P = .006) and male sex (adjusted OR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.55-3.75; P < .001) were most responsive to the small $25 incentive relative to the message-only arm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this randomized clinical trial, relative to message invitations, invitations with guaranteed, small financial incentives but not lottery incentives increased enrollment of economically but not necessarily racially or ethnically diverse participants to a study that aimed to increase enrollment in clinical studies.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06033066.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"6 8","pages":"e252273"},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12374222/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.2273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Persons from marginalized racial and ethnic groups and of low socioeconomic status are at high risk of dementia but are underrepresented in clinical trials. Financial incentives may improve representation.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of financial incentives on enrollment of county health system patients into a memory concerns registry.

Design, setting, and participants: Between March 1, 2024, and April 24, 2024, patients 50 years and older without a dementia diagnosis within a single integrated county health system that includes a hospital and 9 outpatient health centers were invited to enroll in the Alzheimer Prevention Trials (APT) Webstudy, an online observational study aimed at accelerating enrollment into Alzheimer disease clinical trials.

Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to an invitation message (arm 1), a message with a small ($25) enrollment incentive (arm 2), or a message with an enrollment incentive of entry into a $2500 lottery with 1 in 100 odds of award (arm 3).

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was enrollment, defined as APT Webstudy registration and completion of at least 1 of 2 remote cognitive assessments. Outcomes were measured through April 30, 2024.

Results: Of 44 844 patients invited to the APT Webstudy, the mean (SD) age was 64.7 (10.1) years, 25 447 (56.8%) were women, 25 044 (55.8%) had Medicaid insurance, 11 347 (25.3%) were Hispanic/Latino, 9526 (21.2%) were non-Hispanic Asian, 6044 (13.5%) were non-Hispanic Black, and 12 109 (27%) were non-Hispanic White. A total of 401 participants (0.9%) enrolled in the APT Webstudy. Relative to the message-only arm, participants randomized to the small incentive arm were more likely to enroll (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.39; 95% CI, 1.09-1.76; P = .008) in the APT Webstudy while those in the prize incentive arm were not more likely to enroll (adjusted OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.84-1.39; P > .99). Enrollment in the prize incentive arm was lower relative to the small incentive arm (adjusted OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61-0.98; P = .04). Secondary heterogeneity analyses indicated that patients of White race (adjusted OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.15-2.25; P = .006) and male sex (adjusted OR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.55-3.75; P < .001) were most responsive to the small $25 incentive relative to the message-only arm.

Conclusions and relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, relative to message invitations, invitations with guaranteed, small financial incentives but not lottery incentives increased enrollment of economically but not necessarily racially or ethnically diverse participants to a study that aimed to increase enrollment in clinical studies.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06033066.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一项随机临床试验:增加记忆问题登记处老年参与者多样性的经济激励。
重要性:来自边缘种族和民族群体以及低社会经济地位的人患痴呆症的风险很高,但在临床试验中的代表性不足。财政激励可能会提高代表性。目的:评价财政激励对县卫生系统患者入组记忆问题登记处的影响。设计、设置和参与者:在2024年3月1日至2024年4月24日期间,在一个综合县卫生系统(包括一家医院和9个门诊卫生中心)中,50岁及以上没有痴呆症诊断的患者被邀请参加阿尔茨海默病预防试验(APT)网络研究,这是一项旨在加速阿尔茨海默病临床试验招募的在线观察性研究。干预措施:患者以1:1:1的比例随机分配到邀请信息(第1组)、小额(25美元)入组激励信息(第2组)或入组激励信息(2500美元彩票,中奖几率为1 / 100)(第3组)。主要结局和测量:主要结局是入组,定义为APT Webstudy注册和至少完成2个远程认知评估中的1个。结果测量到2024年4月30日。结果:在受邀参加APT网络研究的44 844例患者中,平均(SD)年龄为64.7(10.1)岁,25 447例(56.8%)为女性,25 044例(55.8%)有医疗补助保险,11 347例(25.3%)为西班牙裔/拉丁裔,9526例(21.2%)为非西班牙裔亚洲人,6044例(13.5%)为非西班牙裔黑人,12 109例(27%)为非西班牙裔白人。共有401名参与者(0.9%)参加了APT网络研究。相对于信息组,随机分配到小激励组的参与者更有可能入组(调整优势比[OR], 1.39; 95% CI, 1.09-1.76; P =。008)在APT网络研究中,而奖励激励组的参与者不太可能入组(调整后的OR为1.08;95% CI为0.84-1.39;P为0.99)。大奖励组的入组人数低于小奖励组(调整后OR为0.78;95% CI为0.61-0.98;P = 0.04)。二级异质性分析显示,白种人患者(调整后OR为1.61;95% CI为1.15-2.25;P =。结论和相关性:在这项随机临床试验中,相对于信息邀请,有保证的、小额财政激励而不是彩票激励的邀请增加了经济上的、但不一定是种族或民族不同的参与者参加一项旨在增加临床研究入组的研究。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT06033066。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信