Review and Commentary on Digital Pathology and Artificial Intelligence in Pathology.

IF 2.8 Q2 ONCOLOGY
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-27 DOI:10.1200/CCI-25-00017
Sahussapont Joseph Sirintrapun
{"title":"Review and Commentary on Digital Pathology and Artificial Intelligence in Pathology.","authors":"Sahussapont Joseph Sirintrapun","doi":"10.1200/CCI-25-00017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This Special Article provides a comprehensive review and expert commentary on the prospective clinical implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in the detection of prostate cancer from digital prostate biopsies, as presented in the original research by Flach et al. It contextualizes the study within broader developments in digital pathology and AI, addressing barriers to adoption and the implications for diagnostic workflows and pathology practice.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Drawing on insights from the CONFIDENT-P trial and the author's own experience with digital pathology and AI-assisted workflows, this article critically examines the clinical, regulatory, economic, and operational dimensions of implementing AI in diagnostic pathology. The focus centers on real-world deployment, particularly the integration of Paige Prostate Detect AI (PPD-AI) and its influence on immunohistochemistry (IHC) utilization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The commentary highlights the trial's prospective design as a significant advancement in AI validation. Key findings include a reduction in IHC use, high diagnostic performance of PPD-AI, and improved diagnostic confidence among AI-assisted pathologists. However, variability in IHC practices across institutions, limitations in AI generalizability, and the need for system integration remain major challenges. The article also addresses practical issues such as automation bias, model drift, and lack of interoperability between viewers and laboratory information systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The adoption of AI in digital pathology is accelerating but requires thoughtful integration into clinical workflows. Although prostate biopsies represent an ideal entry point, broader success will depend on regulatory alignment, workforce training, infrastructure readiness, and data governance. This commentary underscores the importance of clinician-AI synergy and provides practical guidance for laboratories navigating the transition from pilot implementations to scalable clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":51626,"journal":{"name":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","volume":"9 ","pages":"e2500017"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI-25-00017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This Special Article provides a comprehensive review and expert commentary on the prospective clinical implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in the detection of prostate cancer from digital prostate biopsies, as presented in the original research by Flach et al. It contextualizes the study within broader developments in digital pathology and AI, addressing barriers to adoption and the implications for diagnostic workflows and pathology practice.

Design: Drawing on insights from the CONFIDENT-P trial and the author's own experience with digital pathology and AI-assisted workflows, this article critically examines the clinical, regulatory, economic, and operational dimensions of implementing AI in diagnostic pathology. The focus centers on real-world deployment, particularly the integration of Paige Prostate Detect AI (PPD-AI) and its influence on immunohistochemistry (IHC) utilization.

Results: The commentary highlights the trial's prospective design as a significant advancement in AI validation. Key findings include a reduction in IHC use, high diagnostic performance of PPD-AI, and improved diagnostic confidence among AI-assisted pathologists. However, variability in IHC practices across institutions, limitations in AI generalizability, and the need for system integration remain major challenges. The article also addresses practical issues such as automation bias, model drift, and lack of interoperability between viewers and laboratory information systems.

Conclusion: The adoption of AI in digital pathology is accelerating but requires thoughtful integration into clinical workflows. Although prostate biopsies represent an ideal entry point, broader success will depend on regulatory alignment, workforce training, infrastructure readiness, and data governance. This commentary underscores the importance of clinician-AI synergy and provides practical guidance for laboratories navigating the transition from pilot implementations to scalable clinical use.

数字病理学与病理学人工智能综述与评述。
目的:这篇专题文章对Flach等人的原始研究中提出的人工智能(AI)在数字前列腺活检中检测前列腺癌的前瞻性临床应用进行了全面的回顾和专家评论。它将研究置于数字病理学和人工智能的更广泛发展背景下,解决了采用的障碍以及对诊断工作流程和病理学实践的影响。设计:根据confidence - p试验的见解以及作者自己在数字病理学和人工智能辅助工作流程方面的经验,本文批判性地考察了在诊断病理学中实施人工智能的临床、监管、经济和操作层面。重点是现实世界的部署,特别是Paige前列腺检测AI (PPD-AI)的集成及其对免疫组织化学(IHC)利用的影响。结果:评论强调了该试验的前瞻性设计是人工智能验证的重大进步。主要发现包括IHC使用的减少,PPD-AI的高诊断性能,以及ai辅助病理学家诊断信心的提高。然而,各机构间免疫健康实践的可变性、人工智能推广的局限性以及对系统集成的需求仍然是主要挑战。本文还讨论了一些实际问题,如自动化偏差、模型漂移,以及观察者和实验室信息系统之间缺乏互操作性。结论:人工智能在数字病理学中的应用正在加速,但需要深思熟虑地融入临床工作流程。尽管前列腺活检是一个理想的切入点,但更广泛的成功将取决于监管一致性、劳动力培训、基础设施准备和数据治理。本评论强调了临床医生与人工智能协同作用的重要性,并为实验室从试点实施过渡到可扩展的临床应用提供了实用指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
190
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信