{"title":"Strengthening the role of third sector intermediary bodies in democratic governance: developing strategies with state and non-state actors.","authors":"Jane Cullingworth","doi":"10.1332/17442648Y2025D000000062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Third sector intermediary bodies play an important role in representing third sector and community perspectives in democratic governance. A key challenge they face is in navigating relationships between the third sector and the state.</p><p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>This article presents the outcomes and learnings from a knowledge exchange (KE) project, co-designed with a third sector intermediary body, that engaged stakeholders in the development of policy recommendations to address the challenges intermediary bodies face in managing their complex role. It also reflects on the process and challenges of engaging different stakeholders in a process designed to develop collective recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>KE events were held to present previous research findings about the role of intermediary bodies in democratic governance. Interested intermediary bodies, third sector organisations and public bodies participated in interviews or focus groups to develop recommendations.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Developing collective policy ideas with diverse stakeholders is a complex process for researchers, particularly when the approach is co-designed with only one stakeholder organisation. Different perspectives can be difficult to bridge and there is a risk that resulting recommendations will be diluted.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>This project highlighted the challenges associated with putting evidence into action and in co-designing projects. A key learning is the need for clear and upfront communication with collaborating organisations. Despite the challenges that exist in working across diverse stakeholder groups, third sector intermediary bodies are uniquely placed to act as knowledge brokers, representing experience at the community level and bringing this understanding into democratic governance spaces and networks.</p>","PeriodicalId":51652,"journal":{"name":"Evidence & Policy","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/17442648Y2025D000000062","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Third sector intermediary bodies play an important role in representing third sector and community perspectives in democratic governance. A key challenge they face is in navigating relationships between the third sector and the state.
Aims and objectives: This article presents the outcomes and learnings from a knowledge exchange (KE) project, co-designed with a third sector intermediary body, that engaged stakeholders in the development of policy recommendations to address the challenges intermediary bodies face in managing their complex role. It also reflects on the process and challenges of engaging different stakeholders in a process designed to develop collective recommendations.
Methods: KE events were held to present previous research findings about the role of intermediary bodies in democratic governance. Interested intermediary bodies, third sector organisations and public bodies participated in interviews or focus groups to develop recommendations.
Findings: Developing collective policy ideas with diverse stakeholders is a complex process for researchers, particularly when the approach is co-designed with only one stakeholder organisation. Different perspectives can be difficult to bridge and there is a risk that resulting recommendations will be diluted.
Discussion and conclusions: This project highlighted the challenges associated with putting evidence into action and in co-designing projects. A key learning is the need for clear and upfront communication with collaborating organisations. Despite the challenges that exist in working across diverse stakeholder groups, third sector intermediary bodies are uniquely placed to act as knowledge brokers, representing experience at the community level and bringing this understanding into democratic governance spaces and networks.