Strengthening the role of third sector intermediary bodies in democratic governance: developing strategies with state and non-state actors.

IF 2.5 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Jane Cullingworth
{"title":"Strengthening the role of third sector intermediary bodies in democratic governance: developing strategies with state and non-state actors.","authors":"Jane Cullingworth","doi":"10.1332/17442648Y2025D000000062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Third sector intermediary bodies play an important role in representing third sector and community perspectives in democratic governance. A key challenge they face is in navigating relationships between the third sector and the state.</p><p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>This article presents the outcomes and learnings from a knowledge exchange (KE) project, co-designed with a third sector intermediary body, that engaged stakeholders in the development of policy recommendations to address the challenges intermediary bodies face in managing their complex role. It also reflects on the process and challenges of engaging different stakeholders in a process designed to develop collective recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>KE events were held to present previous research findings about the role of intermediary bodies in democratic governance. Interested intermediary bodies, third sector organisations and public bodies participated in interviews or focus groups to develop recommendations.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Developing collective policy ideas with diverse stakeholders is a complex process for researchers, particularly when the approach is co-designed with only one stakeholder organisation. Different perspectives can be difficult to bridge and there is a risk that resulting recommendations will be diluted.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>This project highlighted the challenges associated with putting evidence into action and in co-designing projects. A key learning is the need for clear and upfront communication with collaborating organisations. Despite the challenges that exist in working across diverse stakeholder groups, third sector intermediary bodies are uniquely placed to act as knowledge brokers, representing experience at the community level and bringing this understanding into democratic governance spaces and networks.</p>","PeriodicalId":51652,"journal":{"name":"Evidence & Policy","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/17442648Y2025D000000062","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Third sector intermediary bodies play an important role in representing third sector and community perspectives in democratic governance. A key challenge they face is in navigating relationships between the third sector and the state.

Aims and objectives: This article presents the outcomes and learnings from a knowledge exchange (KE) project, co-designed with a third sector intermediary body, that engaged stakeholders in the development of policy recommendations to address the challenges intermediary bodies face in managing their complex role. It also reflects on the process and challenges of engaging different stakeholders in a process designed to develop collective recommendations.

Methods: KE events were held to present previous research findings about the role of intermediary bodies in democratic governance. Interested intermediary bodies, third sector organisations and public bodies participated in interviews or focus groups to develop recommendations.

Findings: Developing collective policy ideas with diverse stakeholders is a complex process for researchers, particularly when the approach is co-designed with only one stakeholder organisation. Different perspectives can be difficult to bridge and there is a risk that resulting recommendations will be diluted.

Discussion and conclusions: This project highlighted the challenges associated with putting evidence into action and in co-designing projects. A key learning is the need for clear and upfront communication with collaborating organisations. Despite the challenges that exist in working across diverse stakeholder groups, third sector intermediary bodies are uniquely placed to act as knowledge brokers, representing experience at the community level and bringing this understanding into democratic governance spaces and networks.

加强第三部门中介机构在民主治理中的作用:与国家和非国家行为体一起制定战略。
背景:第三部门中介机构在民主治理中代表第三部门和社区观点方面发挥着重要作用。他们面临的一个关键挑战是如何处理第三部门与政府之间的关系。目的和目标:本文介绍了与第三部门中介机构共同设计的知识交流(KE)项目的成果和经验教训,该项目让利益相关者参与制定政策建议,以解决中介机构在管理其复杂角色时面临的挑战。它还反映了让不同利益攸关方参与旨在制定集体建议的过程的过程和挑战。方法:举办KE活动,介绍以往关于中介机构在民主治理中的作用的研究成果。有兴趣的中介机构、第三界别机构和公共机构参与访谈或焦点小组,以提出建议。研究结果:对于研究人员来说,与不同的利益相关者一起发展集体政策思想是一个复杂的过程,特别是当方法仅与一个利益相关者组织共同设计时。不同的观点可能难以沟通,而且产生的建议可能会被稀释。讨论和结论:本项目强调了将证据付诸行动和共同设计项目所面临的挑战。一个关键的学习是需要与合作组织进行清晰和预先的沟通。尽管在与不同利益相关者群体的合作中存在挑战,但第三部门中介机构具有独特的地位,可以充当知识经纪人,代表社区层面的经验,并将这种理解带入民主治理空间和网络。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Evidence & Policy
Evidence & Policy SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
53
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信