Psychological Safety of Radiologic Science Students.

IF 0.5 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Radiologic Technology Pub Date : 2025-05-01
Laura Aaron, Mary Grace Renfro, Cindy McGuire
{"title":"Psychological Safety of Radiologic Science Students.","authors":"Laura Aaron, Mary Grace Renfro, Cindy McGuire","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the psychological safety of students in radiologic science programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A revised version of the Psychological Safety in High Fidelity Simulation scale was sent to program directors of accredited radiography, sonography, radiation therapy, magnetic resonance imaging, and nuclear medicine technology programs to share with their students. Descriptive statistics, a 1-way analysis of variance, and paired t tests were conducted to determine differences in psychological safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant difference in psychological safety scores was identified between the classroom and clinical learning environments (P , .001) with students having higher levels of psychological safety in the classroom. The psychological safety scores of senior students were significantly higher than those of junior students in the classroom setting (P 5 .03) and the clinical setting (P 5 .02), and the seniors' average overall psychological safety score was significantly higher than the juniors' score (P 5 .02).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Psychological safety differs between the classroom and clinical settings and is generally higher in the classroom. In most instances, senior students had higher psychological safety scores than did junior students.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Understanding the effects of student level (junior vs senior) and learning environment (classroom vs clinic) can help educators incorporate strategies to improve the psychological safety of students in radiologic science programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51772,"journal":{"name":"Radiologic Technology","volume":"96 5","pages":"343-350"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologic Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the psychological safety of students in radiologic science programs.

Methods: A revised version of the Psychological Safety in High Fidelity Simulation scale was sent to program directors of accredited radiography, sonography, radiation therapy, magnetic resonance imaging, and nuclear medicine technology programs to share with their students. Descriptive statistics, a 1-way analysis of variance, and paired t tests were conducted to determine differences in psychological safety.

Results: A significant difference in psychological safety scores was identified between the classroom and clinical learning environments (P , .001) with students having higher levels of psychological safety in the classroom. The psychological safety scores of senior students were significantly higher than those of junior students in the classroom setting (P 5 .03) and the clinical setting (P 5 .02), and the seniors' average overall psychological safety score was significantly higher than the juniors' score (P 5 .02).

Discussion: Psychological safety differs between the classroom and clinical settings and is generally higher in the classroom. In most instances, senior students had higher psychological safety scores than did junior students.

Conclusion: Understanding the effects of student level (junior vs senior) and learning environment (classroom vs clinic) can help educators incorporate strategies to improve the psychological safety of students in radiologic science programs.

放射学专业学生的心理安全
目的:探讨放射学专业学生的心理安全问题。方法:将修订后的高保真度模拟心理安全量表发送给经认证的放射学、超声、放射治疗、磁共振成像和核医学技术专业的项目主任,与他们的学生分享。采用描述性统计、单因素方差分析和配对t检验来确定心理安全的差异。结果:心理安全得分在课堂学习环境与临床学习环境之间存在显著差异(P, P。001)学生在课堂上有更高的心理安全感。高年级学生的心理安全得分显著高于初中生(P < 0.05)。03)和临床环境(P < 0.05)。老年人的平均心理安全总分显著高于低年级学生(P < 0.05)。讨论:心理安全在课堂和临床环境中有所不同,通常在课堂中更高。在大多数情况下,高年级学生的心理安全得分高于低年级学生。结论:了解学生水平(低年级与高年级)和学习环境(课堂与诊所)的影响可以帮助教育工作者制定策略,提高放射科学专业学生的心理安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiologic Technology
Radiologic Technology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: Radiologic Technology is an official scholarly journal of the American Society of Radiologic Technologists. Published continuously since 1929, it circulates to more than 145,000 readers worldwide. This award-winning bimonthly Journal covers all disciplines and specialties within medical imaging, including radiography, mammography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, nuclear medicine imaging, sonography and cardiovascular-interventional radiography. In addition to peer-reviewed research articles, Radi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信