Healthcare costs associated with gender dysphoria in children, adolescents and young adults in germany: A prevalence-based analysis using statutory health insurance data.
Sophie Gottschalk, Claudia Konnopka, Katja Nettermann, Alicia Başoğlu, Ursula Marschall, Dirk Horenkamp-Sonntag, Angela Rölver, André Karch, Georg Romer, Hans-Helmut König
{"title":"Healthcare costs associated with gender dysphoria in children, adolescents and young adults in germany: A prevalence-based analysis using statutory health insurance data.","authors":"Sophie Gottschalk, Claudia Konnopka, Katja Nettermann, Alicia Başoğlu, Ursula Marschall, Dirk Horenkamp-Sonntag, Angela Rölver, André Karch, Georg Romer, Hans-Helmut König","doi":"10.1007/s10198-025-01832-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the past decade, there has been an increase in individuals presenting to healthcare services with gender dysphoria (GD), the psychological distress that may arise when an individual's birth-assigned sex does not align with his/her experienced gender. The current study aimed to analyze resource use and costs associated with prevalent GD in individuals aged 4 to 30 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The analysis was a prevalence-based cost study using data of the two largest German health insurance funds (BARMER and TK) from 2018, 2019, and 2020. Individuals with prevalent GD were identified based on ICD-10 diagnosis codes related to gender dysphoria. These were compared to a control group balanced for (1) age, birth-assigned sex, degree of urbanization, and (2) additionally for psychiatric diagnoses using entropy balancing. Outcomes of interest were total and sector-specific annual costs (outpatient, inpatient, medications) and health-related resource use (hospital days, defined daily doses of medications). Groups were compared stratified by age groups, birth-assigned sex, and for a subgroup of individuals with GD receiving hormonal therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals with prevalent GD aged 4-30 years had higher average resource use and costs compared to controls, with little variation between years (e.g. difference in 2019 +€4,843 [95% confidence interval €4,306; €5,380], balanced for age, birth-assigned sex, degree of urbanization). The group difference was observed across age groups and healthcare sectors, with the largest differences found in somatic and psychiatric inpatient hospitalizations, and with psychiatric costs accounting for 50% of the total cost difference. Comparing individuals with GD receiving hormonal therapy with controls, the difference in total costs was similar, but the contribution of psychiatric costs was less pronounced (29%). The cost difference decreased considerably in all subgroups and sectors when psychiatric diagnoses were additionally balanced for.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individuals with GD aged 4-30 years had higher annual resource use and costs than controls. Future studies analyzing resource use and costs over multiple years and examining the temporal association between GD and psychiatric disorders would allow a more accurate estimate of the costs directly attributable to GD.</p>","PeriodicalId":51416,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Health Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-025-01832-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: In the past decade, there has been an increase in individuals presenting to healthcare services with gender dysphoria (GD), the psychological distress that may arise when an individual's birth-assigned sex does not align with his/her experienced gender. The current study aimed to analyze resource use and costs associated with prevalent GD in individuals aged 4 to 30 years.
Methods: The analysis was a prevalence-based cost study using data of the two largest German health insurance funds (BARMER and TK) from 2018, 2019, and 2020. Individuals with prevalent GD were identified based on ICD-10 diagnosis codes related to gender dysphoria. These were compared to a control group balanced for (1) age, birth-assigned sex, degree of urbanization, and (2) additionally for psychiatric diagnoses using entropy balancing. Outcomes of interest were total and sector-specific annual costs (outpatient, inpatient, medications) and health-related resource use (hospital days, defined daily doses of medications). Groups were compared stratified by age groups, birth-assigned sex, and for a subgroup of individuals with GD receiving hormonal therapy.
Results: Individuals with prevalent GD aged 4-30 years had higher average resource use and costs compared to controls, with little variation between years (e.g. difference in 2019 +€4,843 [95% confidence interval €4,306; €5,380], balanced for age, birth-assigned sex, degree of urbanization). The group difference was observed across age groups and healthcare sectors, with the largest differences found in somatic and psychiatric inpatient hospitalizations, and with psychiatric costs accounting for 50% of the total cost difference. Comparing individuals with GD receiving hormonal therapy with controls, the difference in total costs was similar, but the contribution of psychiatric costs was less pronounced (29%). The cost difference decreased considerably in all subgroups and sectors when psychiatric diagnoses were additionally balanced for.
Conclusions: Individuals with GD aged 4-30 years had higher annual resource use and costs than controls. Future studies analyzing resource use and costs over multiple years and examining the temporal association between GD and psychiatric disorders would allow a more accurate estimate of the costs directly attributable to GD.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Health Economics is a journal of Health Economics and associated disciplines. The growing demand for health economics and the introduction of new guidelines in various European countries were the motivation to generate a highly scientific and at the same time practice oriented journal considering the requirements of various health care systems in Europe. The international scientific board of opinion leaders guarantees high-quality, peer-reviewed publications as well as articles for pragmatic approaches in the field of health economics. We intend to cover all aspects of health economics:
• Basics of health economic approaches and methods
• Pharmacoeconomics
• Health Care Systems
• Pricing and Reimbursement Systems
• Quality-of-Life-Studies The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements.
Officially cited as: Eur J Health Econ