Reliability and validity of The Assessment of Readiness for Mobility Transition short form.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY
Kellia J Hansmann, Mary Bachman DeSilva, Thomas M Meuser
{"title":"Reliability and validity of The Assessment of Readiness for Mobility Transition short form.","authors":"Kellia J Hansmann, Mary Bachman DeSilva, Thomas M Meuser","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Some adults outlive their driving life expectancy and face retirement from driving. The Assessment of Readiness for Mobility Transition (ARMT) is a 24-item tool designed to measure emotional and attitudinal readiness for such a transition. The objective of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of an eight-item Short Form (ARMT-SF) to increase the feasibility of using this tool in time-constrained clinical contexts.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We conducted factor analysis of ARMT-SF items in a sample of community-dwelling older adults (n = 304; age = 55-96 years) from New England who completed annual wellness surveys in 2019-2021. We used principal component analyses to compare (1) factor structure of the ARMT-SF to the original ARMT and (2) correlations between the ARMT-SF and other gerontological assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants were White (98%), female (74%), married/partnered (67%), and retired (71%). We identified three factors (Eigenvalues > 1) which accounted for 61% of variance. Seven of the items loaded distinctly on these factors. Validity correlations showed the ARMT-SF is not associated with age, but is associated with depression, anxiety, and perceived cognitive decline.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>The ARMT-SF is a valid instrument to assess attitudinal and emotional readiness for a mobility transition. This readiness construct is embedded in broader aging-related adjustment and so relevant to geriatric assessment. By using this brief screening tool to identify patients' readiness for change and tailor communication and care planning accordingly, clinicians may be able to reduce time barriers to important mobility transition counseling.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12450281/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf185","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Some adults outlive their driving life expectancy and face retirement from driving. The Assessment of Readiness for Mobility Transition (ARMT) is a 24-item tool designed to measure emotional and attitudinal readiness for such a transition. The objective of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of an eight-item Short Form (ARMT-SF) to increase the feasibility of using this tool in time-constrained clinical contexts.

Research design and methods: We conducted factor analysis of ARMT-SF items in a sample of community-dwelling older adults (n = 304; age = 55-96 years) from New England who completed annual wellness surveys in 2019-2021. We used principal component analyses to compare (1) factor structure of the ARMT-SF to the original ARMT and (2) correlations between the ARMT-SF and other gerontological assessments.

Results: Participants were White (98%), female (74%), married/partnered (67%), and retired (71%). We identified three factors (Eigenvalues > 1) which accounted for 61% of variance. Seven of the items loaded distinctly on these factors. Validity correlations showed the ARMT-SF is not associated with age, but is associated with depression, anxiety, and perceived cognitive decline.

Discussion and implications: The ARMT-SF is a valid instrument to assess attitudinal and emotional readiness for a mobility transition. This readiness construct is embedded in broader aging-related adjustment and so relevant to geriatric assessment. By using this brief screening tool to identify patients' readiness for change and tailor communication and care planning accordingly, clinicians may be able to reduce time barriers to important mobility transition counseling.

机动过渡短形式(arm - sf)准备评估的信度和效度。
背景和目的:一些成年人超过了他们的驾驶寿命,面临退休驾驶。移动过渡准备评估(ARMT)是一个包含24个项目的工具,旨在衡量这种过渡的情感和态度准备。本研究的目的是确定8项简短表格(arms - sf)的可靠性和有效性,以增加在时间有限的临床环境中使用该工具的可行性。研究设计和方法:我们对来自新英格兰的社区居住老年人(n = 304,年龄= 55-96岁)进行了因子分析,这些老年人在2019-2021年完成了年度健康调查。我们使用主成分分析来比较(1)ARMT- sf与原始ARMT的因子结构;(2)ARMT- sf与其他老年学评估之间的相关性。结果:参与者为白人(98%)、女性(74%)、已婚/有伴侣(67%)和退休(71%)。我们确定了三个因素(特征值> 1),它们占方差的61%。其中七个项目明显与这些因素有关。效度相关性显示,arm - sf与年龄无关,但与抑郁、焦虑和认知能力下降有关。讨论和启示:ARMT-SF是评估移动性转变的态度和情感准备的有效工具。这种准备状态结构嵌入到更广泛的与老龄化相关的调整中,因此与老年评估相关。通过使用这个简短的筛选工具来确定患者对改变的准备,并相应地调整沟通和护理计划,临床医生可能能够减少重要的流动性过渡咨询的时间障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信