Originalbeiträge (Originals). The ICD-11 Model of Personality Disorders and its Diagnostic Measures: A Systematic Review / Das ICD-11-Modell der Persönlichkeitsstörungen und seine diagnostischen Instrumente: Ein systematisches Review.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Doris Hoffmann-Lamplmair, Simon Schober, Victor Blüml
{"title":"Originalbeiträge (Originals). The ICD-11 Model of Personality Disorders and its Diagnostic Measures: A Systematic Review / Das ICD-11-Modell der Persönlichkeitsstörungen und seine diagnostischen Instrumente: Ein systematisches Review.","authors":"Doris Hoffmann-Lamplmair, Simon Schober, Victor Blüml","doi":"10.13109/zptm.2025.71.3.272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The introduction of a new dimensional approach for the diagnosis of personality disorders in ICD-11 entails the need for valid instruments to operationalize the new model. The present study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the existing research on the available instruments for the new model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was carried out with PubMed. Only empirical data on the ICD-11 personality model in adults were considered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 93 publications, 79 studies applied at least one relevant diagnostic instrument. The majority showed satisfactory reliability, construct validity and criterion-related validity. The most investigated measures are the Standardized Assessment of Severity of Personality Disorder (SASPD), Personality Disorder Severity ICD-11 scale (PDS-ICD-11), Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (PiCD) and Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief-Version-Modified+ (PID-5-BF+M).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The available diagnostic instruments for the new ICD-11 PD model show promising results. The development of a sound structured clinical interview is desirable.</p>","PeriodicalId":51217,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Psychosomatische Medizin Und Psychotherapie","volume":"71 3","pages":"272-292"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Psychosomatische Medizin Und Psychotherapie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13109/zptm.2025.71.3.272","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The introduction of a new dimensional approach for the diagnosis of personality disorders in ICD-11 entails the need for valid instruments to operationalize the new model. The present study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the existing research on the available instruments for the new model.

Methods: A systematic literature search was carried out with PubMed. Only empirical data on the ICD-11 personality model in adults were considered.

Results: Of 93 publications, 79 studies applied at least one relevant diagnostic instrument. The majority showed satisfactory reliability, construct validity and criterion-related validity. The most investigated measures are the Standardized Assessment of Severity of Personality Disorder (SASPD), Personality Disorder Severity ICD-11 scale (PDS-ICD-11), Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (PiCD) and Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief-Version-Modified+ (PID-5-BF+M).

Conclusion: The available diagnostic instruments for the new ICD-11 PD model show promising results. The development of a sound structured clinical interview is desirable.

Originalbeiträge(原版).ICD-11人格障碍模型及其诊断措施:系统综述。
目的:在ICD-11中引入一种新的维度方法来诊断人格障碍,需要有效的工具来操作新模型。本研究的目的是提供一个全面的概述现有研究的可用工具的新模式。方法:利用PubMed进行系统文献检索。仅考虑成人ICD-11人格模型的经验数据。结果:在93篇出版物中,79篇研究至少应用了一种相关的诊断仪器。大多数量表的信度、结构效度和效标相关效度都令人满意。研究最多的测量方法是人格障碍严重程度标准化评估(SASPD)、人格障碍严重程度ICD-11量表(PDS-ICD-11)、ICD-11人格量表(PiCD)和DSM-5简要版本修改+人格量表(PID-5-BF+M)。结论:现有的诊断工具对新的ICD-11 PD模型显示出良好的效果。发展一种结构完善的临床面谈是可取的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
30
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal provides a systematic overview of the entire field of psychosomatic medicine. It is also the official organ of the German Society for Psychosomatic Medicine and Medical Psychotherapy (DGPM). It serves as a forum for discussions of the interdisciplinary experiences in the field of psychosomatics, the goal being the furtherance of scientific insights into the interactions between mental and physical factors in the development of disease. It also provides a way to deepen one´s knowledge of psychoanalysis and to explore new therapeutic directions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信