Penicillin Allergy Delabeling in Pediatric Primary Care: A Multisite Qualitative Study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Eileen J Carter, Elizabeth Monsees, Sharon Hwang, Tara Schmidt, Mary Lou Manning, Cliff O'Callahan, Rana E El Feghaly, Monika Pogorzelska-Maziarz
{"title":"Penicillin Allergy Delabeling in Pediatric Primary Care: A Multisite Qualitative Study.","authors":"Eileen J Carter, Elizabeth Monsees, Sharon Hwang, Tara Schmidt, Mary Lou Manning, Cliff O'Callahan, Rana E El Feghaly, Monika Pogorzelska-Maziarz","doi":"10.1016/j.acap.2025.103139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Allergy societies recommend penicillin allergy (PA) delabeling via history alone or following direct challenge (DC) in children at low risk for true PA. Recent studies demonstrate the safety of PA delabeling in pediatric primary care. We aimed to identify primary care practitioners' attitudes towards PA delabeling, and perceived barriers and enablers to PA delabeling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi structured interviews (n=11) and focus groups (n=3) with 29 primary care practitioners of two health systems in the northeast United States. We coded transcripts using content analysis and mapped barriers and enablers to the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation COM-B model of behavior.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants perceived PA delabeling to benefit children and shared prior attempts to delabel PAs in primary care. Barriers to PA delabeling included a lack of skills and training to delabel (capability), perceived caregiver resistance to delabel, inadequate time, staff, and space to delabel (opportunity), which led to mixed desires among practitioners to delabel (motivation). To enable PA delabeling in primary care, participants recommended partnership with allergists to implement a delabeling protocol, tools to engage caregivers in delabeling, innovative workflows and infrastructures to facilitate delabeling, and an amplification of reasons for delabeling to occur in pediatric primary care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Primary care practitioners perceived PA delabeling as beneficial to children's health, and specified intervention targets (enablers) to facilitate delabeling. To propel PA delabeling in pediatric primary care, interventions are needed to optimize practitioner skills, secure caregiver interest, and ensure the necessary resources, time, and space for practitioners to delabel.</p>","PeriodicalId":50930,"journal":{"name":"Academic Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"103139"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2025.103139","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Allergy societies recommend penicillin allergy (PA) delabeling via history alone or following direct challenge (DC) in children at low risk for true PA. Recent studies demonstrate the safety of PA delabeling in pediatric primary care. We aimed to identify primary care practitioners' attitudes towards PA delabeling, and perceived barriers and enablers to PA delabeling.

Methods: We conducted semi structured interviews (n=11) and focus groups (n=3) with 29 primary care practitioners of two health systems in the northeast United States. We coded transcripts using content analysis and mapped barriers and enablers to the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation COM-B model of behavior.

Results: Participants perceived PA delabeling to benefit children and shared prior attempts to delabel PAs in primary care. Barriers to PA delabeling included a lack of skills and training to delabel (capability), perceived caregiver resistance to delabel, inadequate time, staff, and space to delabel (opportunity), which led to mixed desires among practitioners to delabel (motivation). To enable PA delabeling in primary care, participants recommended partnership with allergists to implement a delabeling protocol, tools to engage caregivers in delabeling, innovative workflows and infrastructures to facilitate delabeling, and an amplification of reasons for delabeling to occur in pediatric primary care.

Conclusion: Primary care practitioners perceived PA delabeling as beneficial to children's health, and specified intervention targets (enablers) to facilitate delabeling. To propel PA delabeling in pediatric primary care, interventions are needed to optimize practitioner skills, secure caregiver interest, and ensure the necessary resources, time, and space for practitioners to delabel.

青霉素过敏标签在儿科初级保健:一项多地点定性研究。
目的:过敏学会推荐青霉素过敏(PA)通过单独病史或直接挑战(DC)对真实PA低风险儿童进行标签去除。最近的研究表明在儿科初级保健中PA去标签是安全的。我们的目的是确定初级保健从业者对个人助理去标签的态度,以及感知到的障碍和促进个人助理去标签的因素。方法:我们对美国东北部两个卫生系统的29名初级保健从业人员进行了半结构化访谈(n=11)和焦点小组访谈(n=3)。我们使用内容分析对转录本进行编码,并将障碍和促成因素映射到行为的能力、机会和动机COM-B模型。结果:参与者认为PA去标签有利于儿童,并分享了在初级保健中PA去标签的先前尝试。PA去标签的障碍包括缺乏去标签的技能和培训(能力),感知到护理人员对去标签的抵制,时间、人员和空间不足(机会),这导致从业者对去标签的混合愿望(动机)。为了在初级保健中实现PA去标签,参与者建议与过敏症专家合作实施去标签协议,使用工具使护理人员参与去标签,创新工作流程和基础设施以促进去标签,并扩大在儿科初级保健中发生去标签的原因。结论:初级保健医生认为PA去标签对儿童健康有益,并规定了干预目标(使能者)以促进去标签。为了推动儿科初级保健中的PA去标签,需要采取干预措施来优化从业人员技能,确保护理人员的兴趣,并确保从业人员去标签所需的资源、时间和空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Pediatrics
Academic Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.90%
发文量
300
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Academic Pediatrics, the official journal of the Academic Pediatric Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to strengthen the research and educational base of academic general pediatrics. The journal provides leadership in pediatric education, research, patient care and advocacy. Content areas include pediatric education, emergency medicine, injury, abuse, behavioral pediatrics, holistic medicine, child health services and health policy,and the environment. The journal provides an active forum for the presentation of pediatric educational research in diverse settings, involving medical students, residents, fellows, and practicing professionals. The journal also emphasizes important research relating to the quality of child health care, health care policy, and the organization of child health services. It also includes systematic reviews of primary care interventions and important methodologic papers to aid research in child health and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信