EPA to Milestones Advisor for Pediatric Subspecialties: Developing a Comprehensive Approach to Competency-Based Assessment.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Laura C Page, Debra Boyer, YoungNa Lee-Kim, Mary E Moffatt, Brenda Nuncio Lujano, Darcy Weidemann, Alan Schwartz, David A Turner, Deborah Hsu
{"title":"EPA to Milestones Advisor for Pediatric Subspecialties: Developing a Comprehensive Approach to Competency-Based Assessment.","authors":"Laura C Page, Debra Boyer, YoungNa Lee-Kim, Mary E Moffatt, Brenda Nuncio Lujano, Darcy Weidemann, Alan Schwartz, David A Turner, Deborah Hsu","doi":"10.1016/j.acap.2025.103122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This project sought to define the relationship between the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Milestones 2.0 and Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for each of 15 pediatric subspecialties and create a novel tool that could automate the generation of expected milestone behaviors for a given EPA level of supervision.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Workgroups for each of the pediatric subspecialties selected Milestone 2.0 subcompetencies that were essential to performing each EPA through a modified Delphi approach. Additionally, the groups assigned predicted Milestone levels expected for each EPA Level of Supervision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty percent (6/15) of subspecialties mapped all Milestone subcompetencies to their EPAs. Although variations existed among subspecialties, trainees were generally not expected to have achieved 'expertise' or (Milestone level 5) to be ready for practice without supervision (EPA Level of Supervision 5). Group assignments of anticipated Milestones levels for each EPA Level of Supervision were used to create an online tool intended to suggest milestone levels for a subspecialty fellow based on EPA Level of Supervision ratings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Strengthening pediatric subspecialty educators' understanding of the roles of Milestones 2.0 and EPAs in fellow education is critical to achieve goals of competency-based medical education. This work, which includes a novel tool that predicts milestone levels based on EPA Level of Supervision ratings, represents an important step in delineating the relationship between Milestones 2.0 and EPAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50930,"journal":{"name":"Academic Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"103122"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2025.103122","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This project sought to define the relationship between the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Milestones 2.0 and Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for each of 15 pediatric subspecialties and create a novel tool that could automate the generation of expected milestone behaviors for a given EPA level of supervision.

Methods: Workgroups for each of the pediatric subspecialties selected Milestone 2.0 subcompetencies that were essential to performing each EPA through a modified Delphi approach. Additionally, the groups assigned predicted Milestone levels expected for each EPA Level of Supervision.

Results: Forty percent (6/15) of subspecialties mapped all Milestone subcompetencies to their EPAs. Although variations existed among subspecialties, trainees were generally not expected to have achieved 'expertise' or (Milestone level 5) to be ready for practice without supervision (EPA Level of Supervision 5). Group assignments of anticipated Milestones levels for each EPA Level of Supervision were used to create an online tool intended to suggest milestone levels for a subspecialty fellow based on EPA Level of Supervision ratings.

Conclusions: Strengthening pediatric subspecialty educators' understanding of the roles of Milestones 2.0 and EPAs in fellow education is critical to achieve goals of competency-based medical education. This work, which includes a novel tool that predicts milestone levels based on EPA Level of Supervision ratings, represents an important step in delineating the relationship between Milestones 2.0 and EPAs.

EPA致儿科专科里程碑顾问:开发基于能力评估的综合方法。
目的:本项目旨在定义研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)里程碑2.0与15个儿科亚专科的可信赖专业活动(EPAs)之间的关系,并创建一个新的工具,可以自动生成给定EPA监督级别的预期里程碑行为。方法:每个儿科亚专科的工作组通过改进的德尔菲方法选择对执行每个EPA至关重要的Milestone 2.0子能力。此外,小组分配了每个EPA监管级别预期的里程碑水平。结果:40%(6/15)的子专业将所有Milestone的子能力映射到他们的EPAs。尽管各子专业之间存在差异,受训者通常不期望达到“专业知识”或(里程碑级别5)在没有监督的情况下准备好实践(EPA监督级别5)。每个EPA监督级别的预期里程碑级别的小组分配用于创建一个在线工具,旨在根据EPA监督级别评级为亚专业研究员建议里程碑级别。结论:加强儿科亚专科教育者对里程碑2.0和EPAs在同伴教育中的作用的理解是实现能力本位医学教育目标的关键。这项工作,包括一个基于EPA监管等级预测里程碑水平的新工具,代表了描绘里程碑2.0和EPA之间关系的重要一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Pediatrics
Academic Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.90%
发文量
300
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Academic Pediatrics, the official journal of the Academic Pediatric Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to strengthen the research and educational base of academic general pediatrics. The journal provides leadership in pediatric education, research, patient care and advocacy. Content areas include pediatric education, emergency medicine, injury, abuse, behavioral pediatrics, holistic medicine, child health services and health policy,and the environment. The journal provides an active forum for the presentation of pediatric educational research in diverse settings, involving medical students, residents, fellows, and practicing professionals. The journal also emphasizes important research relating to the quality of child health care, health care policy, and the organization of child health services. It also includes systematic reviews of primary care interventions and important methodologic papers to aid research in child health and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信