Care quality metrics in Medicare during COVID-19 pandemic.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jeanette Thornton, Mark Hamelburg, Lynn Nonnemaker, Sherzod Abdukadirov, German Veselovskiy, Sari Siegel
{"title":"Care quality metrics in Medicare during COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Jeanette Thornton, Mark Hamelburg, Lynn Nonnemaker, Sherzod Abdukadirov, German Veselovskiy, Sari Siegel","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2025.89781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the impact on quality of care for individuals enrolled in Medicare Advantage (MA) plans or traditional Medicare (TM) during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study examined beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare from 2017 through 2021. Beneficiaries were divided into 4 cohorts based on their enrollment in TM or MA and the year of enrollment in 2019, the year before the COVID-19 pandemic, or 2021, during the COVID-19 pandemic. For each cohort, 12 clinical quality measures were constructed, including 4 screening measures requiring in-person visits and 8 medication management and adherence measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3,190,208 Medicare beneficiaries were included (58.4% female; mean age, 73.0 years). In both 2019 and 2021, the MA program performed significantly better than TM across the 12 clinical quality measures. Compared with the year before the pandemic, both programs experienced a decrease in screening measures that required in-person visits during the pandemic, with a slightly higher decrease for the MA plans. In contrast, measures of medication management and adherence improved for both programs, but especially for MA plans.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MA plans continued to outperform TM on clinical quality measures during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2025.89781","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine the impact on quality of care for individuals enrolled in Medicare Advantage (MA) plans or traditional Medicare (TM) during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Methods: The study examined beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare from 2017 through 2021. Beneficiaries were divided into 4 cohorts based on their enrollment in TM or MA and the year of enrollment in 2019, the year before the COVID-19 pandemic, or 2021, during the COVID-19 pandemic. For each cohort, 12 clinical quality measures were constructed, including 4 screening measures requiring in-person visits and 8 medication management and adherence measures.

Results: A total of 3,190,208 Medicare beneficiaries were included (58.4% female; mean age, 73.0 years). In both 2019 and 2021, the MA program performed significantly better than TM across the 12 clinical quality measures. Compared with the year before the pandemic, both programs experienced a decrease in screening measures that required in-person visits during the pandemic, with a slightly higher decrease for the MA plans. In contrast, measures of medication management and adherence improved for both programs, but especially for MA plans.

Conclusions: MA plans continued to outperform TM on clinical quality measures during the COVID-19 pandemic.

COVID-19大流行期间医疗保险的护理质量指标。
目的:探讨COVID-19大流行期间参加医疗保险优势计划(MA)或传统医疗保险(TM)的个人的护理质量的影响。研究设计:回顾性队列研究。方法:该研究调查了2017年至2021年参加医疗保险的受益人。根据受益人在TM或MA的注册情况以及2019年(COVID-19大流行前一年)或2021年(COVID-19大流行期间)的注册年份,将受益人分为4个队列。每个队列共构建了12项临床质量指标,其中4项需要亲自访视的筛查指标和8项药物管理及依从性指标。结果:共纳入3190,208名医疗保险受益人(58.4%为女性,平均年龄73.0岁)。在2019年和2021年,硕士项目在12项临床质量指标上的表现明显优于TM。与大流行前一年相比,这两个规划在大流行期间都减少了需要亲自访问的筛查措施,MA计划的减少幅度略高。相比之下,两种方案的药物管理措施和依从性都有所改善,但特别是MA计划。结论:在COVID-19大流行期间,MA计划在临床质量指标上继续优于TM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Managed Care
American Journal of Managed Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信