Identification of child-maltreatment-related emergency department visits from electronic health records.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Margaret L Holland, Amy A Hunter, Nina Livingston, Kirsten Bechtel
{"title":"Identification of child-maltreatment-related emergency department visits from electronic health records.","authors":"Margaret L Holland, Amy A Hunter, Nina Livingston, Kirsten Bechtel","doi":"10.1016/j.acap.2025.103135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Since the implementation of ICD-10-CM in 2015, emergency department (ED) records using expanded child maltreatment codes have been used to estimate the prevalence of child maltreatment in the US. This study compares the efficacy of ICD-10-CM codes with other search strategies in identifying child maltreatment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study was conducted at Yale-New Haven Children's Hospital (YNHCH) and Connecticut Children's Medical Center (CCMC). We examined ED visits for confirmed or suspected child maltreatment concerns from 1/1/2019 to 8/31/2020 among children under 18 years old. Cases were identified using three search strategies: (1) ICD-10-CM codes, (2) keywords in provider notes, and (3) chief complaints. After cases were identified, ED provider notes were reviewed by clinicians to determine if a concern for maltreatment was indicated. Sensitivity and positive predictive values were calculated for each search strategy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 3841 ED records identified by search strategies, 1248 were suspected to involve maltreatment. Using ICD-10-CM codes alone had a sensitivity of 47%; the sensitivity of keywords in provider notes and chief complaints were 65% and 58%, respectively. When ICD-10-CM codes were combined with keywords in provider notes and chief complaints, the sensitivity increased to 82% and 77%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>The use of any single method could miss 35 to 53% of cases, although time-consuming chart review was required to remove identified cases that were not associated with maltreatment. Future research should refine the search strategies and consider utilizing multiple approaches to identify cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":50930,"journal":{"name":"Academic Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"103135"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2025.103135","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Since the implementation of ICD-10-CM in 2015, emergency department (ED) records using expanded child maltreatment codes have been used to estimate the prevalence of child maltreatment in the US. This study compares the efficacy of ICD-10-CM codes with other search strategies in identifying child maltreatment.

Materials and methods: This study was conducted at Yale-New Haven Children's Hospital (YNHCH) and Connecticut Children's Medical Center (CCMC). We examined ED visits for confirmed or suspected child maltreatment concerns from 1/1/2019 to 8/31/2020 among children under 18 years old. Cases were identified using three search strategies: (1) ICD-10-CM codes, (2) keywords in provider notes, and (3) chief complaints. After cases were identified, ED provider notes were reviewed by clinicians to determine if a concern for maltreatment was indicated. Sensitivity and positive predictive values were calculated for each search strategy.

Results: Of 3841 ED records identified by search strategies, 1248 were suspected to involve maltreatment. Using ICD-10-CM codes alone had a sensitivity of 47%; the sensitivity of keywords in provider notes and chief complaints were 65% and 58%, respectively. When ICD-10-CM codes were combined with keywords in provider notes and chief complaints, the sensitivity increased to 82% and 77%, respectively.

Practice implications: The use of any single method could miss 35 to 53% of cases, although time-consuming chart review was required to remove identified cases that were not associated with maltreatment. Future research should refine the search strategies and consider utilizing multiple approaches to identify cases.

从电子健康记录中识别与儿童虐待有关的急诊就诊情况。
目的:自2015年实施ICD-10-CM以来,使用扩展的儿童虐待代码的急诊科(ED)记录已被用于估计美国儿童虐待的发生率。本研究比较了ICD-10-CM代码与其他搜索策略在识别儿童虐待方面的功效。材料和方法:本研究在耶鲁-纽黑文儿童医院(YNHCH)和康涅狄格儿童医学中心(CCMC)进行。我们检查了2019年1月1日至2020年8月31日期间18岁以下儿童中确认或疑似虐待儿童的急诊科就诊情况。使用三种搜索策略确定病例:(1)ICD-10-CM代码,(2)提供者注释中的关键词,(3)主诉。在确定病例后,临床医生会审查急诊科医生的记录,以确定是否有虐待的迹象。计算了每种搜索策略的灵敏度和正预测值。结果:在通过搜索策略确定的3841例ED记录中,1248例疑似涉及虐待。单独使用ICD-10-CM编码的敏感性为47%;供应商说明和主诉中关键词的敏感性分别为65%和58%。当ICD-10-CM代码与供应商说明和主诉中的关键词结合使用时,灵敏度分别提高到82%和77%。实践意义:使用任何单一方法都可能遗漏35%至53%的病例,尽管需要耗时的图表审查以删除与虐待无关的已确定病例。未来的研究应该完善搜索策略,并考虑使用多种方法来识别案例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Pediatrics
Academic Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.90%
发文量
300
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Academic Pediatrics, the official journal of the Academic Pediatric Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to strengthen the research and educational base of academic general pediatrics. The journal provides leadership in pediatric education, research, patient care and advocacy. Content areas include pediatric education, emergency medicine, injury, abuse, behavioral pediatrics, holistic medicine, child health services and health policy,and the environment. The journal provides an active forum for the presentation of pediatric educational research in diverse settings, involving medical students, residents, fellows, and practicing professionals. The journal also emphasizes important research relating to the quality of child health care, health care policy, and the organization of child health services. It also includes systematic reviews of primary care interventions and important methodologic papers to aid research in child health and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信