Margaret L Holland, Amy A Hunter, Nina Livingston, Kirsten Bechtel
{"title":"Identification of child-maltreatment-related emergency department visits from electronic health records.","authors":"Margaret L Holland, Amy A Hunter, Nina Livingston, Kirsten Bechtel","doi":"10.1016/j.acap.2025.103135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Since the implementation of ICD-10-CM in 2015, emergency department (ED) records using expanded child maltreatment codes have been used to estimate the prevalence of child maltreatment in the US. This study compares the efficacy of ICD-10-CM codes with other search strategies in identifying child maltreatment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study was conducted at Yale-New Haven Children's Hospital (YNHCH) and Connecticut Children's Medical Center (CCMC). We examined ED visits for confirmed or suspected child maltreatment concerns from 1/1/2019 to 8/31/2020 among children under 18 years old. Cases were identified using three search strategies: (1) ICD-10-CM codes, (2) keywords in provider notes, and (3) chief complaints. After cases were identified, ED provider notes were reviewed by clinicians to determine if a concern for maltreatment was indicated. Sensitivity and positive predictive values were calculated for each search strategy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 3841 ED records identified by search strategies, 1248 were suspected to involve maltreatment. Using ICD-10-CM codes alone had a sensitivity of 47%; the sensitivity of keywords in provider notes and chief complaints were 65% and 58%, respectively. When ICD-10-CM codes were combined with keywords in provider notes and chief complaints, the sensitivity increased to 82% and 77%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>The use of any single method could miss 35 to 53% of cases, although time-consuming chart review was required to remove identified cases that were not associated with maltreatment. Future research should refine the search strategies and consider utilizing multiple approaches to identify cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":50930,"journal":{"name":"Academic Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"103135"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2025.103135","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Since the implementation of ICD-10-CM in 2015, emergency department (ED) records using expanded child maltreatment codes have been used to estimate the prevalence of child maltreatment in the US. This study compares the efficacy of ICD-10-CM codes with other search strategies in identifying child maltreatment.
Materials and methods: This study was conducted at Yale-New Haven Children's Hospital (YNHCH) and Connecticut Children's Medical Center (CCMC). We examined ED visits for confirmed or suspected child maltreatment concerns from 1/1/2019 to 8/31/2020 among children under 18 years old. Cases were identified using three search strategies: (1) ICD-10-CM codes, (2) keywords in provider notes, and (3) chief complaints. After cases were identified, ED provider notes were reviewed by clinicians to determine if a concern for maltreatment was indicated. Sensitivity and positive predictive values were calculated for each search strategy.
Results: Of 3841 ED records identified by search strategies, 1248 were suspected to involve maltreatment. Using ICD-10-CM codes alone had a sensitivity of 47%; the sensitivity of keywords in provider notes and chief complaints were 65% and 58%, respectively. When ICD-10-CM codes were combined with keywords in provider notes and chief complaints, the sensitivity increased to 82% and 77%, respectively.
Practice implications: The use of any single method could miss 35 to 53% of cases, although time-consuming chart review was required to remove identified cases that were not associated with maltreatment. Future research should refine the search strategies and consider utilizing multiple approaches to identify cases.
期刊介绍:
Academic Pediatrics, the official journal of the Academic Pediatric Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to strengthen the research and educational base of academic general pediatrics. The journal provides leadership in pediatric education, research, patient care and advocacy. Content areas include pediatric education, emergency medicine, injury, abuse, behavioral pediatrics, holistic medicine, child health services and health policy,and the environment. The journal provides an active forum for the presentation of pediatric educational research in diverse settings, involving medical students, residents, fellows, and practicing professionals. The journal also emphasizes important research relating to the quality of child health care, health care policy, and the organization of child health services. It also includes systematic reviews of primary care interventions and important methodologic papers to aid research in child health and education.