Jackson Wahman, Rhoda Hijazi, Danyal Tahseen, Adedeji Adeniyi, Julia E McGuinness, Layla Morgan, Kevin Placide, Tyler Roberson, Avonley Nguyen, Nima Sedghi, Sera Picillo, Raysha Farah, Paul Lewis, Toru Yoshino, Austin Manjila
{"title":"Bridging Oncology and Rehabilitation: A High School Curriculum Model for Early Exposure to Interdisciplinary Cancer Care.","authors":"Jackson Wahman, Rhoda Hijazi, Danyal Tahseen, Adedeji Adeniyi, Julia E McGuinness, Layla Morgan, Kevin Placide, Tyler Roberson, Avonley Nguyen, Nima Sedghi, Sera Picillo, Raysha Farah, Paul Lewis, Toru Yoshino, Austin Manjila","doi":"10.1007/s13187-025-02715-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cancer rehabilitation remains underutilized despite its value in addressing survivorship-related impairments. Early exposure to interdisciplinary cancer care, including oncology and physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R), is limited, particularly for students underrepresented in medicine (URiM). This study evaluated the impact of a novel interdisciplinary workshop introducing oncology and cancer rehabilitation, designed specifically to address the persistent educational and workforce disparities faced by URiM students. A half-day, in-person workshop was conducted in April 2025 at a medical school in New York City. The curriculum included lectures, case-based learning, a procedural suturing session, and a mentorship panel. Pre- and post-workshop surveys assessed self-reported knowledge and confidence in oncology, cancer rehabilitation, and clinical skills. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and unpaired t-tests. Of 160 pre-workshop survey respondents, 94 attended, with 73 completing post-workshop surveys (77.6% response rate). Over half of participants identified as URiM (53.3%). Significant improvements (p < 0.001) were observed across key domains, including confidence in cancer diagnosis (5.6 to 58.9%), understanding oncologist responsibilities (18.1 to 68.5%), oncology-PM&R collaboration awareness (8.8 to 71.2%), and procedural confidence in suturing (12.5 to 63.0%). A single-day interdisciplinary workshop significantly improved knowledge and confidence in oncology and cancer rehabilitation among high school students. Such targeted early-exposure initiatives could enhance diversity, address educational disparities, and improve awareness in the cancer care workforce.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02715-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cancer rehabilitation remains underutilized despite its value in addressing survivorship-related impairments. Early exposure to interdisciplinary cancer care, including oncology and physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R), is limited, particularly for students underrepresented in medicine (URiM). This study evaluated the impact of a novel interdisciplinary workshop introducing oncology and cancer rehabilitation, designed specifically to address the persistent educational and workforce disparities faced by URiM students. A half-day, in-person workshop was conducted in April 2025 at a medical school in New York City. The curriculum included lectures, case-based learning, a procedural suturing session, and a mentorship panel. Pre- and post-workshop surveys assessed self-reported knowledge and confidence in oncology, cancer rehabilitation, and clinical skills. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and unpaired t-tests. Of 160 pre-workshop survey respondents, 94 attended, with 73 completing post-workshop surveys (77.6% response rate). Over half of participants identified as URiM (53.3%). Significant improvements (p < 0.001) were observed across key domains, including confidence in cancer diagnosis (5.6 to 58.9%), understanding oncologist responsibilities (18.1 to 68.5%), oncology-PM&R collaboration awareness (8.8 to 71.2%), and procedural confidence in suturing (12.5 to 63.0%). A single-day interdisciplinary workshop significantly improved knowledge and confidence in oncology and cancer rehabilitation among high school students. Such targeted early-exposure initiatives could enhance diversity, address educational disparities, and improve awareness in the cancer care workforce.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cancer Education, the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education (AACE) and the European Association for Cancer Education (EACE), is an international, quarterly journal dedicated to the publication of original contributions dealing with the varied aspects of cancer education for physicians, dentists, nurses, students, social workers and other allied health professionals, patients, the general public, and anyone interested in effective education about cancer related issues.
Articles featured include reports of original results of educational research, as well as discussions of current problems and techniques in cancer education. Manuscripts are welcome on such subjects as educational methods, instruments, and program evaluation. Suitable topics include teaching of basic science aspects of cancer; the assessment of attitudes toward cancer patient management; the teaching of diagnostic skills relevant to cancer; the evaluation of undergraduate, postgraduate, or continuing education programs; and articles about all aspects of cancer education from prevention to palliative care.
We encourage contributions to a special column called Reflections; these articles should relate to the human aspects of dealing with cancer, cancer patients, and their families and finding meaning and support in these efforts.
Letters to the Editor (600 words or less) dealing with published articles or matters of current interest are also invited.
Also featured are commentary; book and media reviews; and announcements of educational programs, fellowships, and grants.
Articles should be limited to no more than ten double-spaced typed pages, and there should be no more than three tables or figures and 25 references. We also encourage brief reports of five typewritten pages or less, with no more than one figure or table and 15 references.