Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Solid-Organ Transplant Recipients: A Comprehensive Analysis of a Transplant Center.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 TRANSPLANTATION
Arzu Nelihan Akgun, Emir Karacaglar, Senem Has Hasirci, Burak Sayin, Atilla Sezgin, Mehmet Haberal
{"title":"Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Solid-Organ Transplant Recipients: A Comprehensive Analysis of a Transplant Center.","authors":"Arzu Nelihan Akgun, Emir Karacaglar, Senem Has Hasirci, Burak Sayin, Atilla Sezgin, Mehmet Haberal","doi":"10.6002/ect.2024.0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Atrial fibrillation is a common arrhythmia in solid-organ transplant recipients. Oral anticoagulant therapy is essential to prevent stroke and systemic embolism in atrial fibrillation. Warfarin is safe and effective, but non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoa-gulants are an emerging alternative. We examined the safety/efficacy of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in solid-organ transplant recipients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated electronic medical records of 52 solid-organ transplant recipients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation and collected information on demographics, electrocardiogram and laboratory data, anticoagulation treatment, and organ transplant. We compared patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who received non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus warfarin and analyzed the incidence of systemic embolic events and major bleeding events. Scores for CHA2DS2-VASc (ie, congestive heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes, previous stroke/transient ischemic attack) and Anticoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation bleeding risk were obtained for risk assessment of thrombosis versus bleeding, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 43 patients, most were kidney transplant recipients (76.4%), followed by liver (13.9%) and heart (9.3%). Mean bleeding score was higher in the warfarin group, and mean thrombosis score was higher in the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants group but not statistically significant. Incidence of major bleeding events was higher in the warfarin group but not statistically significant. Incidence of systemic embolic events was higher in the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant group but not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study to characterize present use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in solid-organ transplant recipients at a single center in Turkey. We observed that these agents are as effective as warfarin to prevent systemic embolic events and bleeding risks, with no significant difference between therapies. At our institution, we prefer non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with appropriate indications according to the benefit-risk profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":50467,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and Clinical Transplantation","volume":"23 7","pages":"473-478"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6002/ect.2024.0041","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Atrial fibrillation is a common arrhythmia in solid-organ transplant recipients. Oral anticoagulant therapy is essential to prevent stroke and systemic embolism in atrial fibrillation. Warfarin is safe and effective, but non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoa-gulants are an emerging alternative. We examined the safety/efficacy of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in solid-organ transplant recipients.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively evaluated electronic medical records of 52 solid-organ transplant recipients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation and collected information on demographics, electrocardiogram and laboratory data, anticoagulation treatment, and organ transplant. We compared patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who received non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus warfarin and analyzed the incidence of systemic embolic events and major bleeding events. Scores for CHA2DS2-VASc (ie, congestive heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes, previous stroke/transient ischemic attack) and Anticoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation bleeding risk were obtained for risk assessment of thrombosis versus bleeding, respectively.

Results: Of the 43 patients, most were kidney transplant recipients (76.4%), followed by liver (13.9%) and heart (9.3%). Mean bleeding score was higher in the warfarin group, and mean thrombosis score was higher in the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants group but not statistically significant. Incidence of major bleeding events was higher in the warfarin group but not statistically significant. Incidence of systemic embolic events was higher in the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant group but not statistically significant.

Conclusions: This is the first study to characterize present use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in solid-organ transplant recipients at a single center in Turkey. We observed that these agents are as effective as warfarin to prevent systemic embolic events and bleeding risks, with no significant difference between therapies. At our institution, we prefer non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with appropriate indications according to the benefit-risk profile.

评估非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂在实体器官移植受者中的安全性和有效性:一个移植中心的综合分析。
目的:心房颤动是实体器官移植受者常见的心律失常。口服抗凝治疗是必不可少的,以防止卒中和系统性栓塞心房颤动。华法林是安全有效的,但非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂是一种新兴的选择。我们检查了非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂在实体器官移植受者中的安全性/有效性。材料和方法:我们回顾性评估了52例诊断为房颤的实体器官移植受者的电子病历,并收集了人口统计学、心电图和实验室数据、抗凝治疗和器官移植的信息。我们比较了接受非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂和华法林治疗的非瓣膜性心房颤动患者,并分析了系统性栓塞事件和大出血事件的发生率。分别获得CHA2DS2-VASc评分(即充血性心力衰竭、高血压、年龄、糖尿病、既往卒中/短暂性脑缺血发作)和房颤出血风险中的抗凝及危险因素评分,用于血栓形成与出血的风险评估。结果:43例患者中以肾移植为主(76.4%),其次为肝移植(13.9%)和心脏移植(9.3%)。华法林组平均出血评分较高,非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂组平均血栓形成评分较高,但无统计学意义。华法林组大出血事件发生率较高,但无统计学意义。非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂组全身性栓塞事件发生率较高,但无统计学意义。结论:这是土耳其单一中心首次对实体器官移植受者目前使用非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝血剂进行研究。我们观察到这些药物在预防系统性栓塞事件和出血风险方面与华法林一样有效,两种治疗之间没有显著差异。在我们的机构,我们更倾向于根据获益-风险概况对有适当适应症的患者使用非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
258
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of the journal includes the following: Surgical techniques, innovations, and novelties; Immunobiology and immunosuppression; Clinical results; Complications; Infection; Malignancies; Organ donation; Organ and tissue procurement and preservation; Sociological and ethical issues; Xenotransplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信