Exploring the Current Use of Educational Technologies in the Oncology Domain Across Europe: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Jana Steinbacher, Taibe Kulaksız, Marco Kalz
{"title":"Exploring the Current Use of Educational Technologies in the Oncology Domain Across Europe: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Jana Steinbacher, Taibe Kulaksız, Marco Kalz","doi":"10.1007/s13187-025-02703-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Considering the increasing relevance of digital education in cancer training, this study explores the current use of educational technologies in oncology across Europe.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted using convenience sampling to gather responses from learners and educators across Europe. Data was collected online via Lime Survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicate that both groups are most familiar with synchronous and blended learning, with less experience in asynchronous and hybrid formats. Live lectures were the most used tool, while virtual reality and simulations were less used. Regional differences reveal that Northern Europe prefers audio-based tools and e-books, while Central Europe demonstrates higher familiarity with asynchronous learning and interactive tools. Southern Europe has less experience with various modalities and tools. Professionally, cancer nurses reported more experience with asynchronous learning and learning management systems, while clinical oncologists demonstrated limited familiarity with various tools, particularly emerging technologies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For multi-disciplinary oncology training to succeed, practitioners need to align learning objectives with participants' prior experiences and balance diverse target groups and implementation needs to address regional and professional disparities. Targeted efforts are needed to bridge gaps in digital infrastructure, accessibility, and institutional support. Explanatory studies are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02703-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Considering the increasing relevance of digital education in cancer training, this study explores the current use of educational technologies in oncology across Europe.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using convenience sampling to gather responses from learners and educators across Europe. Data was collected online via Lime Survey.

Results: Results indicate that both groups are most familiar with synchronous and blended learning, with less experience in asynchronous and hybrid formats. Live lectures were the most used tool, while virtual reality and simulations were less used. Regional differences reveal that Northern Europe prefers audio-based tools and e-books, while Central Europe demonstrates higher familiarity with asynchronous learning and interactive tools. Southern Europe has less experience with various modalities and tools. Professionally, cancer nurses reported more experience with asynchronous learning and learning management systems, while clinical oncologists demonstrated limited familiarity with various tools, particularly emerging technologies.

Conclusions: For multi-disciplinary oncology training to succeed, practitioners need to align learning objectives with participants' prior experiences and balance diverse target groups and implementation needs to address regional and professional disparities. Targeted efforts are needed to bridge gaps in digital infrastructure, accessibility, and institutional support. Explanatory studies are needed to confirm these findings.

探索目前在整个欧洲肿瘤领域使用的教育技术:一项横断面研究。
背景:考虑到数字教育在癌症培训中的重要性日益增加,本研究探讨了欧洲肿瘤学教育技术的当前使用情况。方法:采用方便抽样的横断面研究方法收集欧洲各地学习者和教育工作者的反馈。数据是通过Lime Survey在线收集的。结果:结果表明,两组学生对同步和混合式学习最熟悉,对异步和混合式学习经验较少。现场讲座是最常用的工具,而虚拟现实和模拟的使用较少。地区差异表明,北欧学生更喜欢基于音频的学习工具和电子书,而中欧学生则更熟悉异步学习和互动工具。南欧在各种模式和工具方面的经验较少。在专业方面,癌症护士在异步学习和学习管理系统方面有更多的经验,而临床肿瘤学家对各种工具,特别是新兴技术的熟悉程度有限。结论:为了使多学科肿瘤学培训取得成功,从业者需要将学习目标与参与者先前的经验保持一致,并平衡不同的目标群体和实施需求,以解决地区和专业差异。需要作出有针对性的努力,弥合数字基础设施、可及性和机构支持方面的差距。需要解释性研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Education
Journal of Cancer Education 医学-医学:信息
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
122
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cancer Education, the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education (AACE) and the European Association for Cancer Education (EACE), is an international, quarterly journal dedicated to the publication of original contributions dealing with the varied aspects of cancer education for physicians, dentists, nurses, students, social workers and other allied health professionals, patients, the general public, and anyone interested in effective education about cancer related issues. Articles featured include reports of original results of educational research, as well as discussions of current problems and techniques in cancer education. Manuscripts are welcome on such subjects as educational methods, instruments, and program evaluation. Suitable topics include teaching of basic science aspects of cancer; the assessment of attitudes toward cancer patient management; the teaching of diagnostic skills relevant to cancer; the evaluation of undergraduate, postgraduate, or continuing education programs; and articles about all aspects of cancer education from prevention to palliative care. We encourage contributions to a special column called Reflections; these articles should relate to the human aspects of dealing with cancer, cancer patients, and their families and finding meaning and support in these efforts. Letters to the Editor (600 words or less) dealing with published articles or matters of current interest are also invited. Also featured are commentary; book and media reviews; and announcements of educational programs, fellowships, and grants. Articles should be limited to no more than ten double-spaced typed pages, and there should be no more than three tables or figures and 25 references. We also encourage brief reports of five typewritten pages or less, with no more than one figure or table and 15 references.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信