Trajectories and Co-Occurrence of Perceived Control in Patients With Heart Failure and Self-Efficacy in Their Caregivers: A Three-Month Longitudinal Study of Dual Trajectories.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Yujun Wang, Yaqi Wang, Xia Chen, Qingyun Lv, Xueying Xu, Jingwen Liu, Yuan He, Hairong Chang, Bowen Wan, Sisi Cheng, Qingyi Wang, Mengmeng Tang, Xiaonan Zhang, Xiaoying Zang, Na Wei
{"title":"Trajectories and Co-Occurrence of Perceived Control in Patients With Heart Failure and Self-Efficacy in Their Caregivers: A Three-Month Longitudinal Study of Dual Trajectories.","authors":"Yujun Wang, Yaqi Wang, Xia Chen, Qingyun Lv, Xueying Xu, Jingwen Liu, Yuan He, Hairong Chang, Bowen Wan, Sisi Cheng, Qingyi Wang, Mengmeng Tang, Xiaonan Zhang, Xiaoying Zang, Na Wei","doi":"10.1111/jocn.70072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to explore the trajectories and co-occurrence of perceived control and caregiver self-efficacy among patients with heart failure (HF) and their caregivers within 3 months post-discharge and identify associated risk factors.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective cohort design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study was conducted from March to June 2024 in Tianjin, China. Information on perceived control and caregiver self-efficacy was collected 24 h before discharge, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months after discharge. Group-Based Dual Trajectory Modelling (GBDTM) and logistic regression were used for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 203 dyads of patients with HF and their caregivers (HF dyads). Perceived control identified three trajectories: low curve (15.3%), middle curve (57.1%) and high curve (27.6%). Caregiver self-efficacy demonstrated three trajectories: low curve (17.2%), middle curve (56.7%) and high stable (26.1%). GBDTM revealed nine co-occurrence patterns, with the highest proportion (36.7%) being 'middle-curve group for perceived control and middle-curve group for caregiver self-efficacy', and 16.7% being 'high-curve group for perceived control and high-stable group for caregiver self-efficacy'. Age, gender, household income, NYHA class, symptom burden and psychological resilience were identified as risk factors for perceived control trajectories; marital status, regular exercise and psychological resilience were identified as risk factors for caregiver self-efficacy trajectories.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified distinct trajectories, co-occurrence patterns and risk factors of perceived control and caregiver self-efficacy among HF dyads. These findings help clinical nurses to better design and implement interventions, strengthening the comprehensive management and care outcomes for HF dyads.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>These findings highlighted the interactive relationship between perceived control and caregiver self-efficacy trajectories, suggesting that interventions should boost both to improve personalised treatment plans and outcomes for HF dyads.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>This study adhered to the STROBE checklist.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>Patients and their caregivers contributed by participating in the study and completing the questionnaire.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.70072","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to explore the trajectories and co-occurrence of perceived control and caregiver self-efficacy among patients with heart failure (HF) and their caregivers within 3 months post-discharge and identify associated risk factors.

Design: A prospective cohort design.

Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted from March to June 2024 in Tianjin, China. Information on perceived control and caregiver self-efficacy was collected 24 h before discharge, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months after discharge. Group-Based Dual Trajectory Modelling (GBDTM) and logistic regression were used for analysis.

Results: The study included 203 dyads of patients with HF and their caregivers (HF dyads). Perceived control identified three trajectories: low curve (15.3%), middle curve (57.1%) and high curve (27.6%). Caregiver self-efficacy demonstrated three trajectories: low curve (17.2%), middle curve (56.7%) and high stable (26.1%). GBDTM revealed nine co-occurrence patterns, with the highest proportion (36.7%) being 'middle-curve group for perceived control and middle-curve group for caregiver self-efficacy', and 16.7% being 'high-curve group for perceived control and high-stable group for caregiver self-efficacy'. Age, gender, household income, NYHA class, symptom burden and psychological resilience were identified as risk factors for perceived control trajectories; marital status, regular exercise and psychological resilience were identified as risk factors for caregiver self-efficacy trajectories.

Conclusion: We identified distinct trajectories, co-occurrence patterns and risk factors of perceived control and caregiver self-efficacy among HF dyads. These findings help clinical nurses to better design and implement interventions, strengthening the comprehensive management and care outcomes for HF dyads.

Impact: These findings highlighted the interactive relationship between perceived control and caregiver self-efficacy trajectories, suggesting that interventions should boost both to improve personalised treatment plans and outcomes for HF dyads.

Reporting method: This study adhered to the STROBE checklist.

Patient or public contribution: Patients and their caregivers contributed by participating in the study and completing the questionnaire.

心衰患者和照护者自我效能感的感知控制轨迹和共现:一项为期三个月的双轨迹纵向研究。
目的:本研究旨在探讨心力衰竭(HF)患者及其照顾者出院后3个月内控制感和照顾者自我效能感的变化轨迹和共现情况,并确定相关危险因素。设计:前瞻性队列设计。方法:于2024年3月至6月在中国天津进行前瞻性队列研究。在出院前24小时、出院后2周、1个月和3个月分别收集控制感和照顾者自我效能感的信息。采用基于分组的双轨迹模型(GBDTM)和逻辑回归进行分析。结果:本研究纳入了203对HF患者及其护理人员(HF对)。感知控制确定了三种轨迹:低曲线(15.3%)、中曲线(57.1%)和高曲线(27.6%)。照顾者自我效能表现为低曲线(17.2%)、中曲线(56.7%)和高稳定(26.1%)三个轨迹。GBDTM共有9种共现模式,其中“知觉控制中曲线组和照顾者自我效能中曲线组”所占比例最高(36.7%),“知觉控制高曲线组和照顾者自我效能高稳定组”所占比例最高(16.7%)。年龄、性别、家庭收入、NYHA等级、症状负担和心理弹性是感知控制轨迹的危险因素;婚姻状况、经常运动和心理弹性被确定为护理者自我效能轨迹的危险因素。结论:我们发现了心衰二人组明显的发展轨迹、共现模式和风险因素,以及感知控制和照顾者自我效能感。这些发现有助于临床护士更好地设计和实施干预措施,加强对心衰患者的综合管理和护理效果。影响:这些研究结果强调了感知控制和照顾者自我效能之间的互动关系,表明干预措施应该促进改善心衰二联体的个性化治疗计划和结果。报告方法:本研究遵循STROBE检查表。患者或公众贡献:患者及其护理人员通过参与研究和填写问卷做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice. JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice. We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信