Preferences for Outcome Data Collection and Access in a Pediatric Autism Learning Health Network Registry.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Donna S Murray, Julia S Anixt, Vijay Vasudevan, Lynn L Cole, Angie Fedele, Arun Karpur, Wendy L Cornell, Lisa M Latten, Eric M Butter, Daniel L Coury
{"title":"Preferences for Outcome Data Collection and Access in a Pediatric Autism Learning Health Network Registry.","authors":"Donna S Murray, Julia S Anixt, Vijay Vasudevan, Lynn L Cole, Angie Fedele, Arun Karpur, Wendy L Cornell, Lisa M Latten, Eric M Butter, Daniel L Coury","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000001401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Health professionals participating in learning health networks collect data for informing clinical decision-making, research, and quality improvement (QI). To optimize the collection and use of clinical and Parent Reported Outcome (PRO) data for these purposes, it is important to understand the priorities of patient registry \"end users\" (clinicians, researchers, and patients/families).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The analysis used a sequential mixed-methods approach with parent (n = 93) and clinician (n = 167) surveys followed by targeted interviews (parent n = 9, clinician/researcher n = 7) completed at Autism Care Network (ACNet) sites to better understand current use of registry data and parent/clinician priorities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty percent of parents reported receiving behavioral data regarding their child from their health provider in the past, and 90% felt these data would help them understand their child's behavior. Among data access options parents preferred an online portal (72%) and/or the clinic's electronic medical record (59%). Parents indicated willingness to complete surveys longitudinally if the assessments correlated with their child's specific areas of difficulty. Priorities for clinicians included easy access to the data (84%), meaningful connection to clinical outcomes (81%), and measures that can demonstrate change in symptoms over time (76%) and that are easy for families to complete (80%). Both groups recommend assessing parenting stress and social determinants of health.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Consideration of end-user priorities can improve patient registry data collection, analysis, and utilization. Families may be more willing to participate if they can receive direct benefit by accessing their own data and clinicians use this data to optimize clinical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50215,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000001401","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Health professionals participating in learning health networks collect data for informing clinical decision-making, research, and quality improvement (QI). To optimize the collection and use of clinical and Parent Reported Outcome (PRO) data for these purposes, it is important to understand the priorities of patient registry "end users" (clinicians, researchers, and patients/families).

Methods: The analysis used a sequential mixed-methods approach with parent (n = 93) and clinician (n = 167) surveys followed by targeted interviews (parent n = 9, clinician/researcher n = 7) completed at Autism Care Network (ACNet) sites to better understand current use of registry data and parent/clinician priorities.

Results: Sixty percent of parents reported receiving behavioral data regarding their child from their health provider in the past, and 90% felt these data would help them understand their child's behavior. Among data access options parents preferred an online portal (72%) and/or the clinic's electronic medical record (59%). Parents indicated willingness to complete surveys longitudinally if the assessments correlated with their child's specific areas of difficulty. Priorities for clinicians included easy access to the data (84%), meaningful connection to clinical outcomes (81%), and measures that can demonstrate change in symptoms over time (76%) and that are easy for families to complete (80%). Both groups recommend assessing parenting stress and social determinants of health.

Conclusion: Consideration of end-user priorities can improve patient registry data collection, analysis, and utilization. Families may be more willing to participate if they can receive direct benefit by accessing their own data and clinicians use this data to optimize clinical care.

儿童自闭症学习健康网络注册中结果数据收集和访问的偏好。
目的:参与学习卫生网络的卫生专业人员收集数据,为临床决策、研究和质量改进(QI)提供信息。为了优化临床和家长报告结果(PRO)数据的收集和使用,了解患者登记“最终用户”(临床医生、研究人员和患者/家属)的优先级是很重要的。方法:采用顺序混合方法进行分析,在自闭症护理网络(ACNet)网站进行家长(n = 93)和临床医生(n = 167)调查,然后进行有针对性的访谈(家长n = 9,临床医生/研究人员n = 7),以更好地了解当前注册数据的使用情况和家长/临床医生的优先事项。结果:60%的父母报告过去从他们的医疗服务提供者那里收到了关于他们孩子的行为数据,90%的父母认为这些数据有助于他们了解孩子的行为。在数据访问选项中,家长更喜欢在线门户网站(72%)和/或诊所的电子病历(59%)。如果评估结果与孩子的特定困难领域相关,家长表示愿意完成纵向调查。临床医生的优先事项包括易于获取数据(84%),与临床结果有意义的联系(81%),以及能够证明症状随时间变化的措施(76%)和家庭易于完成的措施(80%)。这两个组织都建议评估养育压力和健康的社会决定因素。结论:考虑最终用户的优先级可以改善患者登记数据的收集、分析和利用。如果家庭可以通过访问他们自己的数据获得直接利益,并且临床医生使用这些数据来优化临床护理,那么他们可能更愿意参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
155
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics (JDBP) is a leading resource for clinicians, teachers, and researchers involved in pediatric healthcare and child development. This important journal covers some of the most challenging issues affecting child development and behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信