Ureteral stent in ureteroneocystostomy for vesicoureteral reflux: Analysis of the data from National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatrics.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Joan Marie Flor, Maryam Noparast, Kourosh Afshar
{"title":"Ureteral stent in ureteroneocystostomy for vesicoureteral reflux: Analysis of the data from National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatrics.","authors":"Joan Marie Flor, Maryam Noparast, Kourosh Afshar","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.9242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We aimed to assess the association between stent placement during ureteral reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and short-term postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatrics (NSQIP-P). Independent variables included stent placement, age, sex, urologic comorbidity, prior VUR procedures, severity of reflux, preoperative urinary tract infections (UTIs), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, and operative approach. Outcomes of interest were emergency department (ED) visits, operative time, readmissions, unplanned operations, length of hospital stay (LOHS), and postoperative UTIs. Descriptive statistics were performed, and Chi-squared and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for univariate analysis. For multivariate analyses, logistic regression, linear regression, and negative binomial models were applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4550 patients were identified (median age 47.36 months, 68.7% female, 48.8% stented). In multivariate analyses, ureteral stenting was significantly associated with higher rates of ED visits (p=0.0019), related readmissions (p<0.0001), and postoperative UTIs (p<0.0001). The expected length of hospitalization for the stent group was 37% longer than for the non-stent group (p<0.0001), and the operative time was, on average, 31 minutes longer (p<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study reveals an association between ureteral stenting and short-term adverse postoperative outcomes following ureteral reimplantation for VUR. Consideration should be given to the selective use of stents at the time of ureteral reimplantation for VUR. There are limitations to the study due to absence of some surgical data in the database, such as type of reimplant, long-term success rate, and type of stent used.</p>","PeriodicalId":50613,"journal":{"name":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9242","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We aimed to assess the association between stent placement during ureteral reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and short-term postoperative outcomes.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatrics (NSQIP-P). Independent variables included stent placement, age, sex, urologic comorbidity, prior VUR procedures, severity of reflux, preoperative urinary tract infections (UTIs), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, and operative approach. Outcomes of interest were emergency department (ED) visits, operative time, readmissions, unplanned operations, length of hospital stay (LOHS), and postoperative UTIs. Descriptive statistics were performed, and Chi-squared and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for univariate analysis. For multivariate analyses, logistic regression, linear regression, and negative binomial models were applied.

Results: A total of 4550 patients were identified (median age 47.36 months, 68.7% female, 48.8% stented). In multivariate analyses, ureteral stenting was significantly associated with higher rates of ED visits (p=0.0019), related readmissions (p<0.0001), and postoperative UTIs (p<0.0001). The expected length of hospitalization for the stent group was 37% longer than for the non-stent group (p<0.0001), and the operative time was, on average, 31 minutes longer (p<0.0001).

Conclusions: This study reveals an association between ureteral stenting and short-term adverse postoperative outcomes following ureteral reimplantation for VUR. Consideration should be given to the selective use of stents at the time of ureteral reimplantation for VUR. There are limitations to the study due to absence of some surgical data in the database, such as type of reimplant, long-term success rate, and type of stent used.

输尿管支架在膀胱输尿管反流输尿管膀胱造瘘术中的应用:国家外科质量改进计划-儿科学数据分析。
简介:我们旨在评估膀胱输尿管反流(VUR)输尿管再植术中支架放置与短期术后结果的关系。方法:我们对国家外科质量改进计划-儿科(NSQIP-P)进行回顾性分析。独立变量包括支架放置、年龄、性别、泌尿系统合并症、既往VUR手术、反流严重程度、术前尿路感染(uti)、美国麻醉医师学会(ASA)分类和手术入路。我们关注的结果是急诊科(ED)访问量、手术时间、再入院、计划外手术、住院时间(LOHS)和术后尿路感染。采用描述性统计,单因素分析采用卡方检验和Mann-Whitney U检验。多变量分析采用logistic回归、线性回归和负二项模型。结果:共发现4550例患者(中位年龄47.36个月,68.7%为女性,48.8%为支架)。在多变量分析中,输尿管支架置入与更高的ED就诊率(p=0.0019)和相关的再入院率显著相关(结论:本研究揭示了输尿管支架置入与VUR输尿管再植术后短期不良术后结果之间的关联。VUR输尿管再植时应考虑选择性支架的使用。由于数据库中缺乏一些手术数据,例如再植入类型、长期成功率和使用的支架类型,因此本研究存在局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
167
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CUAJ is a a peer-reviewed, open-access journal devoted to promoting the highest standard of urological patient care through the publication of timely, relevant, evidence-based research and advocacy information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信