The Endovascular Therapy Using Excimer Laser Atherectomy for Complex Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis Lesions.

IF 1.5 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Kazunori Horie, Mitsuyoshi Takahara, Shin Takiuchi, Shin Okamoto, Naoki Yoshioka, Nobuhito Kaneko, Kenji Ogata, Yoshiaki Shintani, Takuya Haraguchi, Kuniyasu Ikeoka, Tomoko Kobayashi, Kenji Suzuki, Kuniyoshi Fukai, Yuki Shima, Masahiro Iiya, Norio Tada, Osamu Iida
{"title":"The Endovascular Therapy Using Excimer Laser Atherectomy for Complex Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis Lesions.","authors":"Kazunori Horie, Mitsuyoshi Takahara, Shin Takiuchi, Shin Okamoto, Naoki Yoshioka, Nobuhito Kaneko, Kenji Ogata, Yoshiaki Shintani, Takuya Haraguchi, Kuniyasu Ikeoka, Tomoko Kobayashi, Kenji Suzuki, Kuniyoshi Fukai, Yuki Shima, Masahiro Iiya, Norio Tada, Osamu Iida","doi":"10.1177/15266028251363466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The guidelines recommend excimer laser atherectomy (ELA) for in-stent restenosis (ISR) lesions in femoropopliteal arteries. However, its efficacy is still unknown in ISR related to scaffolds other than bare-metal stent (BMS). This study aimed to evaluate the 1-year clinical outcomes in patients with femoropopliteal ISR lesions treated with endovascular therapy (EVT) using ELA.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective multicenter registry analyzed patients who presented with peripheral artery disease caused by femoropopliteal ISR lesions undergoing EVT with ELA between 2020 and 2024. The primary outcome was re-restenosis 1-year following EVT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, consecutive 166 patients with femoropopliteal ISR lesions were enrolled. The rates of in-stent occlusion and ISR related to scaffolds other than BMS were found in 88.6% and 52.4% of the lesions, respectively. Technical success was achieved in 83.7%. The 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from re-restenosis was 67.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 60.0-75.5). The primary-assisted patency and secondary patency rate was 72.7% (95% CI 65.8-80.3) and 81.5% (95% CI 76.6-88.0), respectively. In the multivariate analysis, slow flow observed in the completion angiography of EVT (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.32; <i>P</i> = .024) and chronic renal failure requiring dialysis (1.72; <i>P</i> = .036) were independently associated with re-restenosis risk. The accumulation of these factors was associated with a lower rate of freedom from re-restenosis; Kaplan-Meier estimates of the rates were 46.6% in subgroups with 1 or 2 risk factors, whereas it was 77.8% in the absence of risk factors. The Kaplan-Meier estimate shows a comparable primary patency rate between ISR related to BMS and drug-eluting stent at 1 year.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ELA provided acceptable technical success in current femoropopliteal ISR lesions; however, the long-term result was clinically suboptimal.Clinical ImpactThis retrospective multicenter registry enrolled 166 patients with in-stent restenosis/in-stent occlusion lesions in femoropopliteal arteries treated with endovascular therapy using excimer laser atherectomy. The technical success rate was acceptable at 83.7%; however, 1-year estimate of freedom from restenosis was clinically suboptimal at 67.6%. The multivariate analysis showed incomplete antegrade blood flow and dialysis-dependent chronic renal failure were independently associated with re-restenosis risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028251363466"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251363466","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The guidelines recommend excimer laser atherectomy (ELA) for in-stent restenosis (ISR) lesions in femoropopliteal arteries. However, its efficacy is still unknown in ISR related to scaffolds other than bare-metal stent (BMS). This study aimed to evaluate the 1-year clinical outcomes in patients with femoropopliteal ISR lesions treated with endovascular therapy (EVT) using ELA.

Materials and methods: This retrospective multicenter registry analyzed patients who presented with peripheral artery disease caused by femoropopliteal ISR lesions undergoing EVT with ELA between 2020 and 2024. The primary outcome was re-restenosis 1-year following EVT.

Results: Overall, consecutive 166 patients with femoropopliteal ISR lesions were enrolled. The rates of in-stent occlusion and ISR related to scaffolds other than BMS were found in 88.6% and 52.4% of the lesions, respectively. Technical success was achieved in 83.7%. The 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from re-restenosis was 67.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 60.0-75.5). The primary-assisted patency and secondary patency rate was 72.7% (95% CI 65.8-80.3) and 81.5% (95% CI 76.6-88.0), respectively. In the multivariate analysis, slow flow observed in the completion angiography of EVT (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.32; P = .024) and chronic renal failure requiring dialysis (1.72; P = .036) were independently associated with re-restenosis risk. The accumulation of these factors was associated with a lower rate of freedom from re-restenosis; Kaplan-Meier estimates of the rates were 46.6% in subgroups with 1 or 2 risk factors, whereas it was 77.8% in the absence of risk factors. The Kaplan-Meier estimate shows a comparable primary patency rate between ISR related to BMS and drug-eluting stent at 1 year.

Conclusion: ELA provided acceptable technical success in current femoropopliteal ISR lesions; however, the long-term result was clinically suboptimal.Clinical ImpactThis retrospective multicenter registry enrolled 166 patients with in-stent restenosis/in-stent occlusion lesions in femoropopliteal arteries treated with endovascular therapy using excimer laser atherectomy. The technical success rate was acceptable at 83.7%; however, 1-year estimate of freedom from restenosis was clinically suboptimal at 67.6%. The multivariate analysis showed incomplete antegrade blood flow and dialysis-dependent chronic renal failure were independently associated with re-restenosis risk.

准分子激光动脉粥样硬化切除术治疗复杂股腘支架内再狭窄病变。
目的:本指南推荐准分子激光动脉粥样硬化切除术(ELA)治疗股腘动脉支架内再狭窄(ISR)病变。然而,其在裸金属支架(bare metal stent, BMS)以外支架相关ISR中的疗效尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估ELA血管内治疗(EVT)治疗股腘动脉ISR病变患者1年的临床结果。材料和方法:这项回顾性多中心登记研究分析了2020年至2024年期间因股腘动脉ISR病变引起的外周动脉疾病接受ELA EVT的患者。主要终点是EVT后1年的再狭窄。结果:总体而言,连续纳入166例股腘动脉ISR病变患者。支架内闭塞率和与BMS以外支架相关的ISR分别占病变的88.6%和52.4%。技术合格率为83.7%。Kaplan-Meier估计的1年再狭窄自由度为67.6%(95%可信区间[CI] 60.0-75.5)。原发性辅助通畅率和继发性通畅率分别为72.7% (95% CI 65.8-80.3)和81.5% (95% CI 76.6-88.0)。在多因素分析中,EVT完成造影观察到血流缓慢(校正风险比,2.32;P =。024)和需要透析的慢性肾衰竭(1.72;P =。036)与再狭窄风险独立相关。这些因素的积累与较低的再狭窄自由率有关;Kaplan-Meier估计,在有1或2个危险因素的亚组中,发生率为46.6%,而在没有危险因素的亚组中,发生率为77.8%。Kaplan-Meier估计显示,与BMS相关的ISR和药物洗脱支架在1年内的原发性通畅率相当。结论:ELA在目前的股腘ISR病变中提供了可接受的技术成功;然而,长期的临床结果并不理想。临床影响:本回顾性多中心研究纳入166例经准分子激光动脉粥样硬化切除术血管内治疗的股腘动脉支架内再狭窄/支架内闭塞病变患者。技术成功率为83.7%,可接受;然而,1年无再狭窄的估计在临床上为67.6%,不理想。多因素分析显示,不完全顺行血流和透析依赖性慢性肾功能衰竭与再狭窄风险独立相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endovascular Therapy (formerly the Journal of Endovascular Surgery) was established in 1994 as a forum for all physicians, scientists, and allied healthcare professionals who are engaged or interested in peripheral endovascular techniques and technology. An official publication of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (ISEVS), the Journal of Endovascular Therapy publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of peripheral endovascular interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信